The Relationship between Five-Factor Model and DSM-۵ Personality Traits on Patients with Borderline Personality Disorder

Publish Year: 1392
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: English
View: 106

This Paper With 9 Page And PDF Format Ready To Download

  • Certificate
  • من نویسنده این مقاله هستم

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این Paper:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_JPCP-2-1_008

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 4 دی 1402

Abstract:

Objective: Despite the fact that new criteria for borderline personality disorder (BPD) were resulted from Five-Factor Model (FFM), there are a small number of studies that investigate the relation between proposed personality traits and FFM. Also, cross-cultural study in this field is needed continuously. Though, the aim of the present study was to evaluate the relation between the FFM and DSM-۵ pathological traits. Methods: This study was a cross-sectional study design. The participants consisted of ۱۳۰ individuals with borderline personality disorder that were selected from prisoners (n=۸۰), outpatients (n=۳۵) and inpatients (n=۱۵). They were recruited from Tehran prisons, and clinical psychology and psychiatry clinics of Razi and Taleghani Hospitals, Tehran, Iran. The Sample was selected based on judgmental sampling. The SCID-II-PQ, SCID-II, NEO-PI-R and DSM- ۵ Personality Trait Rating Form were used for the diagnosis and assessment of personality disorders. Pearson correlation has been used for data analysis. All statistical analyses were performed using the SPSS ۱۶. Results: The results indicate that there is a positive significant relationship between neuroticism (N) with emotional lability (r=۰.۳۴, P<۰.۰۱), anxiousness (r=۰.۲۸۶, P<۰.۰۱) and impulsivity (r=۰.۲۲۹, P<۰.۰۵). Also, there is a significant relationship between openness (O) and emotional lability (r=۰.۳۱۶, P<۰.۰۱) and risk taking (r=۰.۱۹۳, P<۰.۰۵), and negative relation with impulsivity (r=-۰.۲۴۴, P<۰.۰۱), separation insecurity(r=۰.۱۹۴, P<۰.۰۵), and depressivity (r=-۰.۱۹, P<۰.۰۵). In addition, results showed that there is positive significant relationship between FFM and DSM-۵ personality traits with DSM-IV-TR BPD symptoms (P< ۰.۰۱). Conclusion: Results were in line with findings from previous studies and were explained in part by considering how facets/traits of the FFM and DSM-۵ personality traits map onto the concept of BPD. Also, the present study helps understand the adequacy of dimensional approach to evaluate personality pathology, specifically on Iranian sample.

Authors

Mehdi Amini

University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Abbas Pourshahbaz

Department of Psychiatry, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Parvaneh Mohammadkhani

University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Mohammad-Reza Khodaie Ardakani

University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Mozhgan Lotfi

, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran