T R Verma - PhD, Department of Radiotherapy, King George’s Medical University, UP, Lucknow, India
N K Painuly - PhD, Department of Radiotherapy, King George’s Medical University, UP, Lucknow, India
M Tyagi - MSc, Department of Radiology & Radiotherapy, UCMS, Delhi, India
D Johny - MSc, Department of Radiotherapy, King George’s Medical University, UP, Lucknow, India
R Gupta - MD, Department of Radiotherapy, King George’s Medical University, UP, Lucknow, India
M L B Bhatt - MD, Department of Radiotherapy, King George’s Medical University, UP, Lucknow, India

Background: In general, radiotherapy treatment planning is performed using the virtual bolus. It is necessary to investigate physical bolus in comparison to virtual one. Objectives: In the present study, first, radiological properties of superflab Gel bolus and Paraffin wax bolus was investigated in terms of their relative electron density. Then, dosimetric performance of both the bolus (i.e. Gel and Parafin wax) was compared with Virtual bolus.Material and Methods: In This experimental study, the radiological property of Wax and Gel boluses was investigated using two methods. In one, the relative electron density of both the Gel and Wax boluses was calculated by measuring their linear attenuation coefficient where in another method relative electron density was calculated by recording their CT No directly from their CT scan. Later CT scan of solid water slab phantom (dimension ۳۰x۳۰x۱۵ cm۳), with physical boluses (i.e. Gel and Wax bolus) of appropriate thicknesses required to deliver a dose of ۲۰۰ cGy at Dmax using ۴ MV, ۶ MV and ۱۵ MV photon beams, was taken. These CT data sets were retrieved to TPS. A plan was done to deliver a dose of ۲۰۰ cGy at Dmax using Single ۴ MV, ۶ MV and ۱۵ MV photon beams. Dose at depths Dmax, ۱ cm, ۲ cm, ۳ cm, ۴ cm and ۵ cm was recorded. Using this similar method, doses at depths viz Dmax, ۱ cm, ۲ cm, ۳ cm, ۴ cm and ۵ cm was recorded for the Gel and Wax boluses. The differences in dose of gel and wax bolus from virtual bolus were recorded for comparison of their dosimetric performance. Results: The measured (calculated) relative electron density of wax and Gel bolus was found to be ۰.۹۵۸ (۰.۹۲۶) and ۰.۹۲۳ (۰.۹۰۷), respectively. Variation in dosimetric performance of Gel and Wax with reference to Virtual bolus was studied. However, on average, Gel bolus was more consistent with virtual bolus. Conclusion: To avoid any dose difference between, delivered (using physical bolus) and planned (using virtual bolus), the physical boluses should be investigated for their dosimetric performance in comparison to virtual bolus. The results obtained and methodology used in this study can be applied in routine radiotherapy practices.

Paraffin, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Imaging, Waxes