Fatemeh Ezoddini
Soghra Yassaei
Sahar Ghanea

Background: This study was performed to assess the diagnostic accuracy of panoramic radiography in determining the position of impacted permanent maxillary canines. Methods: This was a diagnostic study to define how accurate panoramic radiography is in determining the position of impacted permanent maxillary canines. In panoramic radiographs of ۳۳ patients (with ۴۴ total impacted maxillary canines), α and β angulation, magnification and superimposition were assessed. The long axis of the impacted canine to the occlusal line was named α angle. The long axis of the impacted canine to the vertebral line was named β angle. The real position of the teeth was determined by CBCT. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy of panoramic radiography were calculated. Kappa test was used to assess the agreement between panoramic radiography and CBCT. Roc curves were used to define cut-off point values. Results: α angulation showed ۸۴.۳% of palatal impacted maxillary canines and ۴۱.۶% of buccal teeth in their real position. β angulation showed these positions in ۸۱.۸% and ۸۷.۵% of cases, magnification in ۳۷.۵% and ۵۸.۳% of cases and superimposition in ۵۳.۶% and ۱۰۰% of cases. The degree of agreement between CBCT and α angulation, β angulation, magnification, and superimposition was ۰.۲۷۵, ۰.۵۲۶, ۰.۰۳ and ۰.۲۲۴, respectively. Cut-off point values forαangulation, β angulation and CII were ۶۵ degrees, ۶۳ degrees and ۱.۱۱, respectively. Conclusions: Among different methods, β angulation showed the highest accuracy in the localization of impacted maxillary canines. α angulation and superimposition ranked second and third in terms of accuracy. Magnification had the least accuracy.