Beyond the Black Box Approach to Ethics!; Comment on “Expanded HTA: Enhancing Fairness and Legitimacy”
عنوان مقاله: Beyond the Black Box Approach to Ethics!; Comment on “Expanded HTA: Enhancing Fairness and Legitimacy”
شناسه ملی مقاله: JR_HPM-5-6_009
منتشر شده در در سال 1395
شناسه ملی مقاله: JR_HPM-5-6_009
منتشر شده در در سال 1395
مشخصات نویسندگان مقاله:
Lars Sandman - National Centre for Priority Setting in Health-Care, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
Erik Gustavsson - Division of Arts and Humanities, Department of Culture and Communication, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
خلاصه مقاله:
Lars Sandman - National Centre for Priority Setting in Health-Care, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
Erik Gustavsson - Division of Arts and Humanities, Department of Culture and Communication, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
In the editorial published in this journal, Daniels and colleagues argue that his and Sabin’s accountability for reasonableness (A۴R) framework should be used to handle ethical issues in the health technology assessment (HTA)-process, especially concerning fairness. In contrast to this suggestion, it is argued that such an approach risks suffering from the irrrelevance or insufficiency they warn against. This is for a number of reasons: lack of comprehensiveness, lack of guidance for how to assess ethical issues within the “black box” of A۴R as to issues covered, competence and legitimate arguments and finally seemingly accepting consensus as the final verdict on ethical issues. We argue that the HTA community is already in a position to move beyond this black box approach.
کلمات کلیدی: Health Technology Assessment (HTA), Accountability for Reasonableness (A۴R), Ethics, Ethical, Competence, Ethical Analysis
صفحه اختصاصی مقاله و دریافت فایل کامل: https://civilica.com/doc/2046011/