SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS OF JACKET TYPE OFFSHORE PLATFORMS AGAINST WAVE LOADING HAZARD

Publish Year: 1391
نوع سند: مقاله کنفرانسی
زبان: English
View: 1,057

This Paper With 10 Page And PDF Format Ready To Download

  • Certificate
  • من نویسنده این مقاله هستم

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این Paper:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

ICOPMAS09_063

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 24 خرداد 1393

Abstract:

As offshore structures require more critical and complex designs, the need for accurate approaches to evaluate uncertainty and variability in computer models, loads, geometry, materialproperties, and etc has increased significantly. For problems in which randomness is relatively small, it is clear that a deterministic model is adequate. However, when the level of uncertainty and importance of structure is high, stochastic approaches should be employed for systemanalysis and design. One of the fundamental steps in the structural reliability analysis of structures is to determine the significance of random variables, and how they influence the structural response which can be acquired by sensitivity analyses.The topic of sensitivity analysis for jacket type offshore platforms against wave loading has beenwidely considered by different researchers. Sunder and Connor [1] investigated the sensitivity ofsteel jacket offshore platforms to environmental wave loading utilizing two simplified numerical models under rigid foundation conditions. They studied the effects of wave height, wave period, drag and inertia coefficients, mass and hysteretic structural damping. G. D. Hahn [2] used asimplified model in order to examine the effects of inertia and drag force components, current velocity, fluid-structure interaction, random phase angles and wave cancellation. Haver et al. [3] investigated the sensitivity of the annual failure probability to the selected airgap and currentdesign profile. They demonstrated that the airgap parameter is a crucial parameter regarding the annual probability of structural failure. With regard to sensitivity analyses of jacket type platforms, the effects of foundation modeling have been neglected in majority of researches on the response of jacket platforms against wave loading hazard. As nonlinear response of the pile foundation is the most important source ofpotential nonlinearity in the response of offshore platforms, it is cleat that a more powerful model, which is able to consider soil–pile–structure interaction (SPSI), should be employed.Kenji Kawano and Katta Venkatammana [4] conducted dynamic analysis of large offshorestructures utilizing the impedance function model for the soil–pile foundation system. Moreover, several studies by Makris et al. [5], Mylonakis and Gazetas [6], Guin and Banerjee [7] havefocused on SPSI analyses. Bea performed a series of static pushover analyses on a fixed offshore platform and found that the first nine nonlinear events were concentrated in the foundation piles [8]. Moan et al. demonstrated that the choice of pile/soil modeling method can affect the load distribution and failure mode in the structural model [9].

Authors

Mona Hezarjaribi

collegian , university of Tehran

mohammad reza bahaari

professor , university of Tehran

vahid bagheri bayki

collegian , university of sharif

Hossein Ebrahimian

collegian , university of sharif

مراجع و منابع این Paper:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این Paper را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود Paper لینک شده اند :
  • Sunder, S. S., and Connor, J. J. (1981), Sensitivity analyses ...
  • Hahn, G. D. (1992), Sensitivity of the Dynamic Response of ...
  • Haver, S., Eik, K. J., Nygaard. E. (2002), Reliability Assessment ...
  • Kawano, K., and V enkatammana, K. (1999), Dynamic response and ...
  • Makris, N. Badoni, D., Delis, E., Gazetas, G. (1994), Prediction ...
  • Mylonakis, G., Gazetas, G. (1997), S oil-pile-bridge seismic interaction: kinematic ...
  • Guin, J., Banerjee, P. K. (1998), Coupled soil-p ile-structure interaction ...
  • Bea, R. G. (1991), Earthquake geotechnology in offshore structures, Proceedings ...
  • Moan, T., Hellan, _ and Emami Azadi, M. R. (1997), ...
  • Golafshani A A., Bagheri, V., Ebrahimian, H. and Holmas, T, ...
  • Kicikarslan, S., Banerjee, P.K., Bildik, N. (2003), Inelastic analysis of ...
  • Coyle, H. M., Reese, L.C. (1966), Load transfer for axially ...
  • Matlock, H. (1970), Correlations for design of laterally loaded piles ...
  • Reece, L. C., Cox, W.R., Koop, F. D. (1974), Analysis ...
  • EI Naggar, M. H., Bentley, K, (2000), Dynamic Analysis for ...
  • American Petroleum Institute, (1997), Section 17: Assessment of existing platforms." ...
  • Skallerud, B., and Amdahl, J, (2002), Nonlinear analysis of offshore ...
  • JCSS, (2001), Probabilistic Model Code-Part 1: Basis of Design. (12th ...
  • Haselton, C. B., (2007), Assessing seismic collapse safety of modern ...
  • Hansen, P. F, (1995), Reliability Analysis of a Pile Design, ...
  • Porter, K. A. (2003), An Overview of PEER's P erformance-Bs ...
  • Vorechovsky, M, (2004), Stochastic fracture mechanics and size effect, Ph.D. ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع