Publisher of Iranian Journals and Conference Proceedings

Please waite ..
CIVILICAWe Respect the Science
Publisher of Iranian Journals and Conference Proceedings
عنوان
Paper

Probabilistic holistic seismic risk evaluation methodology for port structures

تعداد صفحات: 10 | تعداد نمایش خلاصه: 643 | نظرات: 0
سال انتشار: 1391
کد COI Paper: ICOPMAS09_162
زبان Paper: Englishglish
(فایل این Paper در 10 صفحه با فرمت PDF قابل دریافت می باشد)

راهنمای دانلود فایل کامل این Paper

اگر در مجموعه سیویلیکا عضو نیستید، به راحتی می توانید از طریق فرم روبرو اصل این Paper را خریداری نمایید.

با عضویت در سیویلیکا می توانید اصل مقالات را با حداقل ۳۳ درصد تخفیف (دو سوم قیمت خرید تک Paper) دریافت نمایید. برای عضویت در سیویلیکا به صفحه ثبت نام مراجعه نمایید.در صورتی که دارای نام کاربری در مجموعه سیویلیکا هستید، ابتدا از قسمت بالای صفحه با نام کاربری خود وارد شده و سپس به این صفحه مراجعه نمایید.

لطفا قبل از اقدام به خرید اینترنتی این Paper، ابتدا تعداد صفحات Paper را در بالای این صفحه کنترل نمایید.

برای راهنمایی کاملتر راهنمای سایت را مطالعه کنید.

خرید و دانلود فایل Paper

با استفاده از پرداخت اینترنتی بسیار سریع و ساده می توانید اصل این مقاله را که دارای 10 صفحه است در اختیار داشته باشید.

قیمت این مقاله : 3,000 تومان

آدرس ایمیل خود را در کادر زیر وارد نمایید:

مشخصات نویسندگان Paper Probabilistic holistic seismic risk evaluation methodology for port structures

Rouhollah Amirabadi - PhD student of Marine Structures University of Tehran
Khosrow Bargi - professor University of Tehran
Moharam Dolatshahi Piroz - Assistant Professor University of Tehran
Payam Amirian - MSc student of Earthquake Engineering University of Tehran

چکیده Paper:

Seaports are the cornerstone of international trade and have become increasingly important as the trend for globalized production and distribution of goods has grown stronger.Seaports are also an important part of transportation networks because they function both as sources and sinks for the freight traffic that flows through the transportation infrastructure of acountry. In the past, ports have suffered serious damages from earthquakes because their locationnear estuaries and river deltas and their construction on landfills has made them particularly susceptible to liquefaction and ground failure. Damage to port structures that reduces theirfunctionality will limit the port’s operational capacity and result not only in monetary lossesattributed to the repair and replacement cost of the structures, but will also result in revenue losses due to reduced throughput. The operational capacity of a maritime port after an earthquakeis of great concern to the port authority and tenants because port revenues and market shareretention depend largely on the continuing operation of the berthing facilities. Moreover, freight movement through the port is important for the local industries and factories. For many regions,a capacity reduction in the port system results in severe economic consequences. Two recent events demonstrate that an earthquake can severely affect port operations. After the1989 Loma Prieta, California, earthquake, one of the 8 container terminals of the Port ofOakland sustained heavy damage and had to cease shipping operations completely. It took almost six months to fully restore operations while the repairs continued. Eventually, the portestimates it spent $14 million (in 1989 dollars) and it took 23 months to inspect, analyze, design,bid, and reconstruct 922m of damaged wharf in that terminal [7]. Fortunately, the ship traffic could be diverted to other operating terminals, so no loss of operating revenues was reported.After the Great Hanshin earthquake in Kobe, Japan in 1995, the direct repair cost incurred by theport of Kobe was estimated to be (in 1995 dollars) $5.5 billion and the economic impacts on port dependent industries due to the loss of operations at the port were estimated to be about $6billion [28]. During the earthquake, the port lost about 80% of its operating capacity due toextensive wharf damage. It was reported [9] that the Port of Kobe had only recovered 80.4% of its monthly amount of exports and imports as compared to before the earthquake. Thispermanent loss of business occurred even though the port had recovered 75% of its cargohandlingcapacity one year later. What is more astonishing in the case of Kobe Port is that, although Japan is a country of earthquakes and during the last 100 years had 185 earthquakeswith Richter magnitude bigger than seven, Kobe had not experienced an earthquake of magnitude bigger than seven in the last thousand years. Thus, the potential for losses to a port2 subjected to an earthquake cannot be ignored but should be evaluated based on the seismicity ofthe region, and mitigation actions should be pursued. Consequently, when authorities plan and design new ports or evaluate and expand existing ones, it is necessary to examine the possiblerepercussion of potential failures due to such extreme events and account for them in their capitalallocation program. In this paper, a probabilistic methodology for evaluation of holistic seismic risk in port structuresis introduced. The results of the model contain the probability of unsafe situations and economic impacts of damages in all levels. The effect of secondary hazards on damages and losses is estimated through probabilistic framework as well.

کلیدواژه ها:

seismic risk, direct loss, indirect economic impacts, port, probability

کد Paper/لینک ثابت به این Paper

برای لینک دهی به این Paper می توانید از لینک زیر استفاده نمایید. این لینک همیشه ثابت است و به عنوان سند ثبت Paper در مرجع سیویلیکا مورد استفاده قرار میگیرد:

https://civilica.com/doc/257038/

کد COI Paper: ICOPMAS09_162

نحوه استناد به Paper:

در صورتی که می خواهید در اثر پژوهشی خود به این Paper ارجاع دهید، به سادگی می توانید از عبارت زیر در بخش منابع و مراجع استفاده نمایید:
undefined, undefined و undefined, undefined و undefined, undefined و undefined, undefined,1391,Probabilistic holistic seismic risk evaluation methodology for port structures,نهمین همایش بین المللی مهندسی سواحل، بنادر و سازه های دریایی,Tehran,,,https://civilica.com/doc/257038

در داخل متن نیز هر جا که به عبارت و یا دستاوردی از این Paper اشاره شود پس از ذکر مطلب، در داخل پارانتز، مشخصات زیر نوشته می شود.
برای بار اول: (1391, Amirabadi, Rouhollah؛ Khosrow Bargi و Moharam Dolatshahi Piroz و Payam Amirian)
برای بار دوم به بعد: (1391, Amirabadi؛ Bargi و Dolatshahi Piroz و Amirian)
برای آشنایی کامل با نحوه مرجع نویسی لطفا بخش راهنمای سیویلیکا (مرجع دهی) را ملاحظه نمایید.

مراجع و منابع این Paper:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این Paper را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود مPaperقاله لینک شده اند :

  • FEMA. 2000. :NEHRP Guidelines for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings." ...
  • Port Simulation Model for Bulk Cargo Operations." Simulation 4 4Aه ...
  • ris, to port and harbor facilities." Proceedings of the POLA ...
  • Risk Reduction Planning for Ports Seismicه [30] Werner, S., C. ...
  • Bruzzone, A.G., R. Mosca, R. Revertia, and S. Rapallo. 2000. ...
  • De Vries, W., A. 1990, December. "Nautical Risk Analysis in ...
  • Basics of Seismic Risk Analysis." Earthquake Spectra 5 (4): 675-702. ...
  • FEMA 1997. Earthquake loss estimation methodology HAZUS, Federal Emergency Management ...
  • Fotinos, G., G. Serventi, and L. Scheibel. 1992, July. "Earthquake ...
  • Frankel, Ernst G. 1987. Port Plamning and Development. New York: ...
  • Hyogo Prefectural Government. 1999, June. "Damage Caused by the Great ...
  • Jalayer, F. 2003. Direct probabilistic seismic analysis: implementing non-linear dynamic ...
  • Kakimoto, R., and P.N. Seneviratne. 2000a. "Financial Risk of Port ...
  • Kakimoto, R., and P.N. Seneviratne. 2000b. "Investment Risk Analysis in ...
  • Kennedy, R.P., Cornell, C.A. & Campbell, R.D. 1980. Probabilistic seismic ...
  • Kozan, E. 1995, Jul 2-5. "Planning seaport container terminals." Modeling ...
  • Nasserasadi, K. 2006b. Seismic risk assessmet methodology for industrial facilities-case ...
  • Nevins, M. R., C.M. Macal, and J.C. Joines. 1998. _ ...
  • Pachakis, D., and A. Kiremidjian. 2005, June. "Probabilistic Loss Estimation ...
  • PIANC. 2001 Seismic Design Guidelines for Port Structures. The Netherlands: ...
  • Porter, K.A. 2000. Ass embly-based vulnerability of buildings _ it's ...
  • Ramani, K. 1996. _ Interactive Simulation Model for the Logistics ...
  • Shabayek, A.A., and W.W. Yeung. 2001. :Effect of seasonal factors ...
  • Tahar, R.M., and K. Hussain. 200 "Simulation and analysis for ...
  • UNCTAD. 1969. Development of Ports: Improvement of Port Operations and ...
  • U.S. Maritime Administratio. 1985, January. Port Risk Management Guidebook. Washington, ...
  • Van, K.M., and R.J. Wijbrands. 1988. "Decision support system for ...
  • Werner, S., ed. 1998, March. Seismic Guidelines for Ports. Ports ...
  • Wittcop, R., and G. Martin, eds. 1990, March. Proceedings of ...
  • Whitman, R.V. & Cornell, C.A. 1976. Seismic Risk and Engineering ...
  • Yeend, J.S. 1997, Oct. «Coastal natural hazars analysis of risk ...
  • Research Info Management

    Certificate | Report Paper

    Export Citation info of this Paper to research management softwares

    علم سنجی و رتبه بندی Paper

    مشخصات مرکز تولید کننده این Paper به صورت زیر است:
    نوع مرکز: state university
    تعداد مقالات: 55,951
    در بخش علم سنجی پایگاه سیویلیکا می توانید رتبه بندی علمی مراکز دانشگاهی و پژوهشی کشور را بر اساس آمار مقالات نمایه شده مشاهده نمایید.

    New Suggested Papers

    New RelatedPapers

    Share this paper

    WHAT IS COI?

    COI is a national code dedicated to all Iranian Conference and Journal Papers. the COI of each paper can be verified online.

    Support