Visual Preferences of Small Urban Parks Based on Spatial Configuration of Place

Publish Year: 1393
نوع سند: مقاله کنفرانسی
زبان: English
View: 1,058

This Paper With 14 Page And PDF Format Ready To Download

  • Certificate
  • من نویسنده این مقاله هستم

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این Paper:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

EETCC01_043

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 12 دی 1393

Abstract:

Recently, in terms of context oriented researches, physical aspects of cities in different area such as small urban parks, gradually has been turned to human dimentions such as human psychological aspects of space. The importance of small urban parks in mega cities has been accepted as an essential component of urban lung and restorative settings. As urban population in the world increases and the cost of maintaining large parks escalates, urban authorities are shifting their attention to creating, designing and maintaining smaller urban parks. However, consideration of public psychological aspects in every region could lead to determination of context oriented design. Design considerations of a small urban parks could promote psychological restoration for people who live in surrounding area of these specific places. In this regard small urban parks may present a different ambience due to their location, size and visual appearence. This research examined visual preferences of 16 small urban parks located in the city of Tabriz, Iran. It employed descriptive statistical analysis as a quantitative survey method based on Kaplan and Kaplan information-processing and Appleton’s prospect-refuge theories. In fact, there were as preselected studied variables by expert panels. Participants rated their preferences for 48 randomly selected colored photographs of the small urban parks. Results indicated that Mystery, as an indicator of having winding shapes of the paths and expansive body of trees, is the most preferred spatial configuration of spaces in those small urban parks, followed by Coherence, Refuge and Complexity. In the end, Legibility and Prospect as indicators of wide perspective and sky lines were the least preferred constructs. The results provide information on preferred visual configurations for small urban parks that may assist urban designers and landscape architects to improve their design based on context oriented information of these small urban spaces for the public.

Authors

habib shahhosseini

Department of Landscape Architecture, Faculty of design and architecture, Universiti Putra Malaysia,

mustafa kamal bin

Department of Landscape Architecture, Faculty of design and architecture, Universiti Putra Malaysia,

suhardi bin maulan

Department of Landscape Architecture, Faculty of design and architecture, Universiti Putra Malaysia,

manohar mariapan

Department of Recreation and Ecotourism, Universiti Putra Malaysia,

مراجع و منابع این Paper:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این Paper را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود Paper لینک شده اند :
  • Abizadeh, S., & Zali, N. (2013). Analyzing Urban Green Space ...
  • Abkar, M., Kamal, M., Maulan, S., & Davoodi, S. R. ...
  • Akalin, A., Yildirim, K., Wilson, C., & Kilicoglu, O. (2009). ...
  • Aminzadeh, B., & Afshar, D. (2004). Urban parks and addiction. ...
  • Ashford, F. C. (1969). The desthetics of engineering design: Business ...
  • Baur, J. W., & Tynon, J. F. (2010). Small-Scale Urban ...
  • Beatley, T. (1999). Green urbdnism: Leorning from Europen cities: _ ...
  • Bishop, I, & Leahy, P. (1989). Assessing the visual impact ...
  • Blobaum, A., & Hunecke, M. (2005). Perceived Danger in Urban ...
  • Bryman, A. (2012). Social research methods: oUP Oxford. ...
  • Chang, C.-Y., Hammitt, W. E., Chen, P.-K., Machnik, L., & ...
  • Chapman, G. A. (1999). Design variables and the success of ...
  • Chen, B., Adimo, O. A., & Bao, Z. (2009). Assessment ...
  • Cheng, C.-K. (2009). U nderstanding visual preferences for landscapes: an ...
  • Chiesura, A. (2004). The role of urban parks for the ...
  • Creswell, . W. (2008). Reseorch design: Qualitotive, quantitative, _ mixed ...
  • Daniel, T. C. (2001). Whither scenic beauty? Visual landscape quality ...
  • Daniel, T. C., & Meitner, M. M. (2001). Re presentationa ...
  • Daumants, L. M. (2003). Foctors affecting visudl preferences for noturalizotion ...
  • Fawcett, W., Ellingham, I., & Platt, S. (2008). Reconciling the ...
  • Fischer, M. A., & Shrout, P. E. (2006). Children's liking ...
  • Gifford, R. (2002). Environmen _ psychology: Principles and practice: Optimal ...
  • Gimblett, H. (1990). Environmentl cognition: The prediction of preference in ...
  • Gimblett, H. R., Itami, R. M., & Fitzgibbon, J. E. ...
  • Hagerhall, C. (2000). Clustering predictors of landscape preference in the ...
  • Hagerhall, C. (2001). Consensus in landscape preference judgements. Journal of ...
  • Herzog, T. R. (1984). A cognitive analysis of preference for ...
  • Herzog, T. R. (1989). A cognitive analysis of preference for ...
  • Herzog, T. R., & Bryce, A. G. (2007). Mystery and ...
  • Herzog, T. R., Kaplan, S., & Kaplan, R. (1976). The ...
  • Herzog, T. R., & Miller, E. J. (1998). The role ...
  • Hildebrand, G. (1999). Origins of drchitecturdl pleasure: Univ of California ...
  • Howley, P. (2011). Landscape aesthetics: Assessing the general publics' preferences ...
  • Hull IV, B., & Revell, G. R. (1989). Issues in ...
  • kemi, M. (2005). The effects of mystery on preference for ...
  • In, R. (2010). Sample size calculator. ...
  • Kaltenborn, B. P., & Bjerke, T. (2002). Associations between environmentl ...
  • Kaplan, R., & Kaplan, S. (1989). The experience of nature: ...
  • Kaplan, S., & Kaplan, R. (1982). Cognition _ environment Praeger ...
  • Kelsch, P. (2006). Forsyth and Musacchio: Designing Small Parks: A ...
  • Krenichyn, K. (2006). 'The only place to go and be ...
  • Lavie, T., & Tractinsky, N. (2004). Assessing dimensions of perceived ...
  • Lee, Y., & Kozar, K. A. (2009). Designing usable online ...
  • Low, N. P., Gleeson, B., Green, R., & Radovi , ...
  • Marcus, C. C., & Francis, C. (1997). People Places: Design ...
  • Maulan, S. (2006). A perceptual study of wetlands: Implications for ...
  • Mealey, L., & Theis, P. (1995). The relationship between mood ...
  • Morancho, A. B. (2003). A hedonic valuation of urban green ...
  • Mumcu, S., Dizenli, T. b., & ozbilen, A. (2010). Prospect ...
  • Nasar, J. L., & Jones, K. M. (1997). Landscapes of ...
  • Nordh, H., Alalouch, C., & Hartig, T. (2011). Assessing restorative ...
  • Nordh, H., Hagerhall, C. M., & Holmqvist, K. (2012). Tracking ...
  • Nordh, H., Hartig, T., Hagerhall, C., & Fry, G. (2009). ...
  • Nordh, H, & Ostby, K. (2013). Pocket parks for people-A ...
  • Norman, D. (2002). Emotion & design: attractive things work better. ...
  • Park, S.-e., Choi, D., & Kim, J. (2004). Critical factors ...
  • Parsons, R. (1991). The potential influences of environmentl perception on ...
  • Peschardt, K. K., Schipperijn, 1., & Stigsdotter, U. K. (2012). ...
  • Pitt, D. G., & Zube, E. H. (1987). Management of ...
  • Ramanujam, P. (2007). P rOS pect-refuge Theory Revisited: A Search ...
  • Rapoport, A. (1977). Humon aspects of urban form: Towards _ ...
  • Real, E., Arce, C., & Manuel Sabucedo, J. (2000). Classification ...
  • Ruddell, E. J., Gramann, J. H., Rudis, V. A., & ...
  • Ryan, R. L. (1998). Local perceptions and values for a ...
  • Smith, B. A. C. (2005). (Re)creating a successful n eighbourhood ...
  • Stamps II, A. E. (2006). Interior Prospect and Refuge 1. ...
  • Steen Jacobsen, J. K. (2007). Use of landscape perception methods ...
  • UIrich, R. S. (1993). Biophilia, biophobia, and natural landscapes. The ...
  • Woodcock, D. M. (1982). _ functionalist approdch to environmentl preference. ...
  • Yoon, S.-J., & Park, J. E. (2011). Do sensory ad ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع