The Effect of Coded Corrective Feedback on Iranian High School Students’ EFL Writing Proficiency

Publish Year: 1393
نوع سند: مقاله کنفرانسی
زبان: English
View: 834

This Paper With 8 Page And PDF Format Ready To Download

  • Certificate
  • من نویسنده این مقاله هستم

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این Paper:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

ELLTE01_096

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 28 شهریور 1394

Abstract:

This study attempted to compare the effect of coded corrective feedback and directcorrective feedback on Iranian EFL students' writing proficiency. To this end, a total of 60Iranian female lower intermediate level EFL learners were randomly selected to receive directversus coded written corrective feedback. The results of data analysis revealed that in generalcoded corrective feedback was more effective in the improvement of the participants writingperformance. They indicated that the participants in experimental group outscored theircounterparts in control group on the posttest. To conclude, it should be noted that the resultsprovided conclusive evidence in favor of coded corrective feedback and the integration of it inEnglish language pedagogy.

Keywords:

Direct written corrective feedback , coded written corrective feedback , writing performance

Authors

Marjan Shahvazian

department of English Yazd Islamic Azad University, Yazd, Iran

Anita Lashkarian

department of English Meybod branch Islamic Azad University, Meybod, Iran

Sima Sayadian

department of English Meybod branch Islamic Azad University, Meybod, Iran

مراجع و منابع این Paper:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این Paper را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود Paper لینک شده اند :
  • Alavinia, P., Javidi, S., & Orujlu, S. (2012). The Impact ...
  • Ashwell, T. (2000). Patterns of teacher response to student writing ...
  • Baleghizadeh, S., & Dadashi, M. (2011). The Effect of Direct ...
  • Bitchener, J. (2008). Evidence in support of written corrective feedback. ...
  • Bitchener, J., & Knoch, U. (2009a). The contribution of written ...
  • Bitchener, J., & Knoch, U. (2009b). The relative effectiveness of ...
  • Bitchener, J., Young, S., & Cameron, D. (2005). The effect ...
  • Chandler, J. (2003). The efficacy of various kinds of error ...
  • Ferris, D., & Roberts, B. (2001). Error feedback in L2 ...
  • Ferris, D. R. (1997). The influence of teacher commentary _ ...
  • Ferris, D. R. (2004). _ i>:Grammar Correction Debate in L2 ...
  • Hartshorn, K. J. (2008). The effects of manageable corrective feedback ...
  • Kepner, C. G. (1991). An experiment in the relationship of ...
  • Lalande, J. F. (1982). Reducing composition _ An experiment. The ...
  • Paltridge, B. (2004a). Academic writing. Language teaching, 3702), 87-105. ...
  • Paltridge, B. (2004b). Approaches to teaching second language writing. Paper ...
  • Raimes, A. (1983). Techniques in Teaching Writing: ERIC. ...
  • Robb, T.. Ross, S., & Shortreed, I. (1986). Salience of ...
  • Selinker, L. (1972). Interlanguage. IRAL, 10, (3), 209-231. ...
  • Sheen, Y. (2007). The effect of focused written corrective feedback ...
  • Truscott, J. (1999). The case for _ case against grammar ...
  • Truscott, J, & Hsu, A. Y.-p. (2008). Error correction, revision, ...
  • Ur, P. (1996). Course. Lan-e Teaching; Practice and ry [. ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع