The Relationship between Ownership Concentration, Financial Information Transparency and Broad / Limited Communications with the Government

Publish Year: 1394
نوع سند: مقاله کنفرانسی
زبان: English
View: 804

This Paper With 17 Page And PDF Format Ready To Download

  • Certificate
  • من نویسنده این مقاله هستم

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این Paper:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

ICEMSS01_061

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 22 مهر 1394

Abstract:

This study examines the relationship between ownership concentration, financial information transparency and broad communications (limited) ofcompanies with the government. The companies which have broad political communications with the government are measured by multi-criteria decisionmakingmodel of TOPSIS and entropy weight method. The research hypotheses are based on a sample consisting of 95 companies over a period of eleven year from 2001 until 2011 and are tested using univariate tests and multivariate regression models and panel data. The results indicate that the mean disclosure score and the combined score of financial reporting quality in the companies which have broad and limited political communications with the government are significantly different from each other. Furthermore, the combined score of financial reporting quality of companies with broad political communications with the government which have concentrated ownership structure is significantly higher. In addition, the results suggest that the quality of disclosure and that of the combined score of financial reporting are higher in the companies with concentrated ownership structure,

Keywords:

Authors

Farzin Rezaei

Assistant Professor of Accounting, Islamic Azad University of Qazvin ,Faculty of Accounting and Management , Qazvin , Iran.

Seyed khosroo Amiri

Department of Accounting, Tehran central Branch, Islamic Azad University,central Tehran, Iran.

مراجع و منابع این Paper:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این Paper را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود Paper لینک شده اند :
  • Azar, A , Rajabzade , A , 2002. Applied D ...
  • Asgharpour , M. 2004. Multi-criteria Decision- making. Third edition. Tehran: ...
  • Bani Mahd, B and Mohseni Sharif, M .2010.The Factors affecting ...
  • Khaleghi Moghadam, H , amd Khalegh, A.200 8 _ Corporate ...
  • Ajinkya, B., Bhojraj, S., Sengupta, P., 2005. The association between ...
  • Barnea, A., Haugen, R. Q., and Senbet, L.W., 1985. Agency ...
  • Bliss, M.A., Gul, F.A., Majid, A., 201 1. Do political ...
  • Boubakri, N., Guedhami, O., Mishra, D., Saffar, W., 2012. Politica ...
  • Bushman, R. Pitotroski, J and Smith, A., 2004. What determines ...
  • Chaney, P.K., Faccio, M., Parsley, 201 1. The quality of ...
  • Cheung, Yan., Leung, Ping Jiang, B. Weiqiang Tan, 2010. A ...
  • Chiang H. 2005. An empirical study of corporate governance and ...
  • Chiu, Chi, Li. 2009. Do transparency and disclosure predict firm ...
  • Ezat, A and EL-Masry, A. 2008. The impact of corporate ...
  • Gelb, D. S. Paul Zarowi. 2002. Corporate disclosure policy and ...
  • Gillan, S.G. and Starks, L.T. 1998. A survey of shareholder ...
  • Healy, P.M., and Palepu, K.G., 2001. Information asymmetry, corporate disclosure, ...
  • Lin, Y..S. Huang, Y .F. Chang and Tseng, C.H. 2007. ...
  • North, D., 1990. Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge ...
  • Olson, M., 1993. Dictatorship, democracy, and development. American Economic Review ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع