A comparison of EPM and WEPP models for estimating soil erosion of Marmeh Watershed in the south Iran

Publish Year: 1394
نوع سند: مقاله کنفرانسی
زبان: English
View: 1,118

This Paper With 20 Page And PDF Format Ready To Download

  • Certificate
  • من نویسنده این مقاله هستم

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این Paper:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

ICARA01_164

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 20 دی 1394

Abstract:

Soil erosion and sediment yield is one of the main challenges in Iran, and quantity estimation of them is an important issue. Two models (the empirical Erosion Potential Method (EPM) and the physical Water Erosion Prediction Project (WEPP)) were applied to predict soil loss and sediment yield for the Marmeh Watershed. After watershed modeling, the simulated sediment yield values were compared with the observed sediment yield values.In the calibration and validation periods, the Nash–Sutcliffe model efficiency (ENS) values forthe WEPP and EPM were 0.977 and 0.981, and 0.903 and 0.927 for WEPP and EPM,respectively. Also, deviation (Re) between the mean simulated and observed sediment values for the WEPP and EPM models were -8.5% and -2.4%, and -2.0% and -0.5%, respectively. These results indicate that the WEPP simulations were better than EPM, and could be used for soil loss and sediment yield estimation in the Marmeh Watershed.

Authors

Hassan Amini

Department of Agricultural Engineering , Khorasgan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran.

Naser Honarjoo

Department of Agricultural Engineering , Khorasgan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran.

Ahmad Jalaliyan

Department of Agricultural Engineering , Khorasgan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran.

Mojtaba Khalilizadeh

Department of Civil Engineering , Larestan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Larestan, Iran.

مراجع و منابع این Paper:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این Paper را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود Paper لینک شده اند :
  • OnApplied Reserch in Agriculture خرداد June 2015 - 1394 ...
  • OnApplied Reserch in Agriculture خرداد June 2015 - 1394 ...
  • OnApplied Reserch in Agriculture خرداد June 2015 - 1394 ...
  • OnApplied Reserch in Agriculture خرداد June 2015 - 1394 ...
  • OnApplied Reserch in Agriculture خرداد June 2015 - 1394 ...
  • Ahmadi H (2004) The study of desertification in Iran. J. ...
  • Amore E, Modica C, Nearing MA, Santoro V (2004) Scale ...
  • ASCE Task Committee (1993) Criteria for evaluation of watershed models. ...
  • Baffaut C, Nearing MA, Ascough JC, Liu BY (1997) The ...
  • Bhuyan SJ, Kalita PK, Janssen KA, Barnes PL (2002) Soil ...
  • _ , _ _ Applicability of various erosion risk assessment ...
  • Bouyoucos GJ (1962) Hydrometer method improved for making particle size ...
  • Chapman HD (1965) Cation exchange capacity. In: Black, C.A. (Ed.), ...
  • Chaves HML, Nearing MA (1991) Uncertainty analysis of the WEPP ...
  • Croke J, Nethery M (2006) Modelling Runoff and Soil Erosion ...
  • Ekwue EI, Samaroo K (2011) A New Laboratory Equipment for ...
  • Emadodin I, Narita D, Bork HR (2011) Soil degradation and ...
  • Flanagan DC, Frankenberger JR, Cochrane TA, Renschler CS, Elliot WJ ...
  • Flanagan DC, Livingstone SJ (1995) USDA Water Erosion Prediction Project: ...
  • Flanagan DC, Nearing MA (Eds.) (1995) USDA-Water Erosion Prediction Project: ...
  • Foster GR, Flanagan DC, Nearing MA, Lane LJ, Risse LM, ...
  • Foster GR, Meyer LD (1972) A closed-form soil erosion equation ...
  • Gavrilovic Z (1988) Use of an empirical method (Erosion Potential ...
  • Gavrilovic Z (1972) Inzenjering o bujicnim tokovima i eroziji. Izgradnja. ...
  • Ghidey F, Alberts EE, Kramer LA (1995) Comparison of runoff ...
  • Huang CH, Bradford JM (1993) Analysis of Slope and Runoff ...
  • Kostadinov S, Zlatic M, Dragicevic S, Novkovic I, Kosanin O, ...
  • Kramer LA, Alberts EE (1995) Validation of WEPP 95.1 daily ...
  • Liu BY, Nearing MA, Baffaut C, Ascough II JC (1997) ...
  • Loague KM, Freeze RA (1985) A comparison of rainfall-runof modeling ...
  • Maleki M (2003) Considering Water Erosion and Comparison EPM Model ...
  • McCuen MA, Snyder WM (1986) Hydrologic Modeling: Statistical Methods and ...
  • Molina A, Govers G, Vanacker V, Poesen J, Zeelmaekers E, ...
  • _ _ (2003) disiderig _ Model, EPM in Evaluating Erosion ...
  • Nash JE, Sutcliffe JV (1970) River flow forecasting through conceptual ...
  • Nearing MA (1998) Why soil erosion modes over-predict small soil ...
  • Nearing MA (2000) Evaluating soil erosion models using measured plot ...
  • Nearing MA, Dear-Ascough L, Laflen JM (1990) Sensitivity analysis of ...
  • Nearing MA, Govers G, Norton LD (1999) Variability in soil ...
  • Nearing MA, Nicks AD (1995) Evaluation of WEPP: Hillslope and ...
  • Pandey A, Chowdary VM, Mal BC, Billib M (2008) Runoff ...
  • Qiang Deng Z, De Lima Joao LMP, Shin Jung H ...
  • Raclot D, Albergel J (2006) Runoff and Water Erosion Modelling ...
  • Ristic R, Radic B, Vasiljevic N, Nikic Z (2011) Land ...
  • _ _ _ _ LAA, Fentie B (1997) A New ...
  • Samani AN, Ahmadi H, Jafari M, Boggs G, Ghoddousi J, ...
  • Shen ZY, Gong YW, Li YH, Hong Q, Xu L, ...
  • Spalevic V, Radanovic D, Bbzadfar B, Djekovic V, Andjelkovic A, ...
  • Storm DE, Barfield B, Ormsbee LE (1990) Hydrology and sedimentology ...
  • USDA Agricultural Research Service and USDA Forest Service (2003) CLIGEN ...
  • Willmott CJ (1981) On the validation of models. Phys. Geogr. ...
  • Wu JQ; Xu AC, Elliot WJ (2000) Adapting WEPP (Water ...
  • Yuksel A, Akay AE, Reis M, Gundogan R (2008) Using ...
  • Zhang XC, Nearing MA, Risse LM, McGregor KC (1996) Evaluation ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع