Analysis of EFL Learners’ Preferences for Error Correction in EFL Academic Context

Publish Year: 1393
نوع سند: مقاله کنفرانسی
زبان: English
View: 705

This Paper With 13 Page And PDF Format Ready To Download

  • Certificate
  • من نویسنده این مقاله هستم

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این Paper:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

ELSCONF02_099

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 25 بهمن 1394

Abstract:

The present study is an attempt to analyze learners’ opinions about error corrections which they receive in the process of language learning. One hundred Iranian EFL students, including both males and females, studying at the departments of foreign languages of Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman and Tehran University took part in this study. In order to obtain the required data, learners’ preferences for error correctionquestionnaire(Fukuda, 2004) was utilized. The findings of this study regarding the necessity, frequency, timing, type of error, method, and delivering agent of error treatment revealed that students insistently wanted to receive error correction. Most of the learners disagreed with immediate error correction and preferred not to be interrupted during their conversations. The students wanted error treatments on their serious, frequent, and individual errors. Implicit error correction, elicitation, and recast were the three most favored types of feedback among the students. Teachers were the most popular source of feedback among students.

Authors

Mina Rastegar

Ph.D TEFL,Foreign Language Department, Shahid Bahonar University, Kerman, Iran

Hajar Homayoon

M.A. TEFL,Foreign Language Department, Shahid Bahonar University, Kerman, Iran

مراجع و منابع این Paper:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این Paper را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود Paper لینک شده اند :
  • Amador, Y. A. (2008). Learner attitude toward error correction in ...
  • Ancker, W. (2000). Errors and corrective feedback: Updated theory and ...
  • Brown, H. D. (2007). Principles of language learning and teaching. ...
  • Diab, R. L. (2005). EFL university students; preferences for error ...
  • Fukuda, Y. (2004). Treatment of spoken errors in Japanese high ...
  • Halimi, S. S. (2008). Indonesian teachers: and students" preferences for ...
  • Hendrickson, J. (1978). Error correction in foreign language teaching: Recent ...
  • Horwitz, E. K. (1988). The beliefs about language learning of ...
  • Katayama, A. (2007). Learners" perceptions toward oral error correction. In ...
  • Lars en-Freeman, D. (2000). Techniques and principles in language teaching. ...
  • Lightbown, P., & Spada, N. (1990). Focus-on-form and corrective feedback ...
  • Lyster, R., & Ranta, L. (1997). Corrective feedback and learner ...
  • Lu, D. (2005). The role of explicit error correction in ...
  • Park, H. S. (2010). Teachers' and learners ' preferences for ...
  • Schulz, R. A. (1996). Focus on form in the foreign ...
  • Schulz, R. A. (2001). Cultural differences in student and teacher ...
  • Truscott, J. (1996). The case against grammar correction in L2 ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع