Recasts or Prompts? Which One is More Effective on Pronunciation of Iranian Third Grade EFL High School Learners?

Publish Year: 1395
نوع سند: مقاله کنفرانسی
زبان: English
View: 652

This Paper With 7 Page And PDF and WORD Format Ready To Download

  • Certificate
  • من نویسنده این مقاله هستم

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این Paper:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

CONFBZRA01_050

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 9 مرداد 1395

Abstract:

This study focused on the effectiveness of two CF techniques –recasts and prompts – on L2 learners’ pronunciation learning. Forty-five female third grade EFL Iranian learners were corrected on their pronunciation errors using recasts or prompts. The learners were divided into 3 groups randomly labeled as prompt, recast, and control. Each group included 15 learners. A pre-test, an immediate post-test, and a delayed post-test were administered. The 6th version of Narcis Dictionary Software was used to administer the mentioned tests and 30 new words from the learners’ own textbook was used in testing the pronunciation of learners and the entire study took 11 weeks. The scores the learners received on these tests were statistically analyzed. Results of repeated measures ANOVAs revealed that explicit feedback (prompt) is, overall, more effective than implicit feedback (recast).

Authors

Aram Afifi

Payame Noor University, Ardabil, Namin; homework

Masud Shahbazi

Mohagheg Ardabili University, Ardabil; homework

مراجع و منابع این Paper:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این Paper را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود Paper لینک شده اند :
  • Neri, A., Cucchiarini, C., & Strik, H. (2001). Effective feedback ...
  • Engwall, O., Bilter, O., Oster, A., & Kjellstroim, H. (2006). ...
  • Lyster, R., & Ranta, L. (1997). Corrective feedback and learner ...
  • Panova, I., & Lyster, R. (2002). Patterns of feedback and ...
  • Doughty, C. (2001). Cognitive underpinning of focus on form. In ...
  • Nicholas, H., Lightbown, P., & Spada, N. (2001). Recasts _ ...
  • Varnosfadrani, A. D., & Basturkmen, H. (2009). The effectiveness of ...
  • Ammar, A., & Spada, N. (2006). One size fits all? ...
  • Ellis, R., Loewen, S., & Erlam, R. (2006). Implicit and ...
  • Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. ...
  • Havranek, G. (2002). When is corrective feedback most likely to ...
  • Lyster, R. (2004). Differential effects of prompts and recasts in ...
  • Ashwell, T. (2000). Patterns of teacher response to student writing ...
  • These findings also echo those of Nassaji (2007), [44] [45] ...
  • Otlowski, M. (1998). Pronunciatio. What are the expectations? The Internet ...
  • Mackey, A., Gass, S., & McDonough, K. (2000). How do ...
  • Surakka, K. (2007). Corrective feedback and learner uptake in an ...
  • Elliott, A. (1997). On the teaching and acquisition of pronunciation ...
  • Macdonald, D., Yule, G., & Powers, M. (1994). Attempts to ...
  • Ammar, A. (2008). Prompts and recasts second language ...
  • Fawbush, B. (2010). Implicit and explicit corrective feedback for middle ...
  • Havranek, G. and Cesnik, H. (2001) Factors ...
  • Affecting the Success of Corrective Feedback (Vol. 1). Amsterdam: John ...
  • Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (1998). Interaction and second language ...
  • Hyland, K. (1990). Providing productive feedback. ELT Journal, 44, 279-285. ...
  • Pica, T. (1994). Research on negotiation: What does it reveal ...
  • Richards, J. C., & Lockhart, C. (1994). Reflective teaching in ...
  • Lyster, R. (1998). Negotiation of form, recasts, and explicit correction ...
  • Nassaji, H. (2007). Elicitation and reformulation and their relationship with ...
  • Chaudron, C. (1988). Second language classrooms. New York: Cambridge University ...
  • Sheen, Y. (2006). Exploring the relationship haracteristic S of recasts ...
  • Zhu, W. (2001). Interaction and feedback in mixed peer response. ...
  • Braidi, S. M. (2002). Reexamining the role of ...
  • Bitchener, J. (2008). Evidence in support of written corrective feedback. ...
  • Bitchener, J., Young, S., &. Cameron, D. (2005). The effect ...
  • Cohen, A., & Cavalacanti, M. C. (1990). Feedback On compositions: ...
  • insights for the classroom (pp. 155-177). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ...
  • Ferris, D. R. (1999). The case for grammar correction in ...
  • Ferris, D. R. (2004). The "grammar correction debate in L2 ...
  • Gaskell, D., & Cobb, T. (2004). Can learners use concordance ...
  • Hong, Y. (2004). The effect of teachers error international students; ...
  • Hu, G. (2002). Potential cultural resistance to pedagogical imports: The ...
  • Hyland, K., & Hyland, F. (2006). Feedback in second language ...
  • Jacobs, G. M., Curtis, A., Braine, G., & Huang, S. ...
  • Mango, C., & Amarles, A. M. (2011). Teachers' feedback practices ...
  • Rollinson, P. (2005). Using peer feedback in the ESL writing ...
  • Sheen, Y. (2008). Recasts, language anxiety, modified output, and L2 ...
  • Tuzi, F. (2004). The impact of e-feedback _ the revisions ...
  • Zacharias, N. T. (2007). Teacher and student attitudes toward teacher ...
  • Zhu, W. (2001). Interaction and feedback in mixed peer response ...
  • Hismanoglu, M. (2006). Current perspectives on ...
  • Han, Z. (2002). A study of the impact of recasts ...
  • Leeman, J. (2003). Recasts and second language development: Beyond negative ...
  • Hawkes, L. (2007). Recasts revisited: The role of recasts in ...
  • Long, M. H., Inagaki, S., & Ortega, L. (1998). The ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع