Publisher of Iranian Journals and Conference Proceedings

Please waite ..
Publisher of Iranian Journals and Conference Proceedings
Login |Register |Help |عضویت کتابخانه ها
Paper
Title

Peer Review Process: The Quality and Duration inIranian Medical Journal

فصلنامه تمرکز بر علوم، دوره: 1، شماره: 1
Year: 1394
COI: JR_FOCS-1-1_005
Language: EnglishView: 405
متن کامل این Paper منتشر نشده است و فقط به صورت چکیده یا چکیده مبسوط در پایگاه موجود می باشد.
توضیح: معمولا کلیه مقالاتی که کمتر از ۵ صفحه باشند در پایگاه سیویلیکا اصل Paper (فول تکست) محسوب نمی شوند و فقط کاربران عضو بدون کسر اعتبار می توانند فایل آنها را دریافت نمایند.

Buy and Download

متن کامل (فول تکست) این مقاله منتشر نشده و یا در سایت موجود نیست و امکان خرید آن فراهم نمی باشد.

Authors

Amir Hasani - Biology MSc, Owjj Publishing Company, Tehran, Iran
Mahdieh Kazemi - Owjj Publishing Company, Tehran, Iran

Abstract:

Introduction: Peer review is a process that will led to a decision for publication amanuscript in a journal or not. Peer review has some states and types. The aim of this studyis going to define the process and clarify the author demands from journals to review theirmanuscripts.Materials and Methods: For having a result in this study I have study and review morethan 200 manuscripts’ peer review result and ask the authors about the satisfaction aboutreviewer’s comments on their manuscript. There are some points that all the journals andeditors should take another look on them and of course there are some points that authorsshould take a look at them. Also peer review always make some serious problems forjournals that some point to resolve these problem will discuss here.Results: According to result of author survey of more than 40 medical journals, 85% ofauthors didn’t satisfied with comments left on their manuscript by editor and reviewers.Also peer review duration are not acceptable for most of authors. On the other hand editorhad some complains about reviewers that do not respond to their invitations.Conclusions: Peer review process with strong and in time comments are a very importantkey for journals to attract the good authors and manuscripts. Peer review should not takea decision foe acceptance or rejection of a manuscript, in fact peer review should increasethe validity and quality of the manuscript even if it would be rejected.

Keywords:

Paper COI Code

This Paper COI Code is JR_FOCS-1-1_005. Also You can use the following address to link to this article. This link is permanent and is used as an article registration confirmation in the Civilica reference:

https://civilica.com/doc/515181/

How to Cite to This Paper:

If you want to refer to this Paper in your research work, you can simply use the following phrase in the resources section:
Hasani, Amir and Kazemi, Mahdieh,1394,Peer Review Process: The Quality and Duration inIranian Medical Journal,https://civilica.com/doc/515181

Research Info Management

Certificate | Report | من نویسنده این مقاله هستم

اطلاعات استنادی این Paper را به نرم افزارهای مدیریت اطلاعات علمی و استنادی ارسال نمایید و در تحقیقات خود از آن استفاده نمایید.

Share this page

More information about COI

COI stands for "CIVILICA Object Identifier". COI is the unique code assigned to articles of Iranian conferences and journals when indexing on the CIVILICA citation database.

The COI is the national code of documents indexed in CIVILICA and is a unique and permanent code. it can always be cited and tracked and assumed as registration confirmation ID.

Support