The Effects of the Concurrent Group Dynamic Assessment on Iranian EFL Learners’Acquisition of Requests and Refusals

Publish Year: 1395
نوع سند: مقاله کنفرانسی
زبان: English
View: 557

This Paper With 20 Page And PDF Format Ready To Download

  • Certificate
  • من نویسنده این مقاله هستم

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این Paper:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

TELLSI14_001

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 6 اسفند 1395

Abstract:

This study delved into the effects of the concurrent group dynamic assessment (hereafter G-DA) on Iranian EFL learners’ acquisition of requests and refusals. To this aim, two intact classes were randomly assigned to two groups; the concurrent G-DA group and non-dynamic assessment (hereafter N-DA) group. As the pre-test, a test was consisting of twenty four written discourse completion tasks (WDCTs) were administered. Afterwards, to run treatment sessions, the participants were required to complete twelve WDCTs in twelve treatment sessions. Drawing on Lantolf and Poehner (2011), the concurrent G-DA group was received fine–tuned and calibrated feedback whereas N-DA group was explicitly provided with pertinent assistance without considering their zones of the proximal development (ZPDs). Additionally, for the sake of having a more comprehensive observation, all dialogues between the teacher and pairs of students under investigation were audio-recorded while they were undertaking the concurrent G-DA in the classroom context. Finally, both groups took a parallel WDCTs test as the post-test. The results indicated that implementing concurrent G-DA rather than N-DA significantly facilitated the learners’ interlanguage pragmatic (henceforth ILP) development. Furthermore, the findings obtained from the microgenetic analysis portrayed how the students moved towards self-regulation by being mediated during concurrent G-DA processes.

Keywords:

interlanguage pragmatic , speech acts , refusals , requests , concurrent group dynamic assessment

Authors

Mahmood Reza Moradian

Ph.D. in TEFL, Lorestan University, Khoramabad, Iran

zeinab azadbakht

M.A. in TEFL, Lorestan University, Khoramabad, Iran

مراجع و منابع این Paper:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این Paper را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود Paper لینک شده اند :
  • The _ I _ _ _ _ _ _ November ...
  • Ableeva, R., & Lantolf, J. (2011). Mediated dialogue and the ...
  • Alavi, M., Kaivanpanah, S., & Shabani, K. (2011). Group dynamic ...
  • Aljafreh, A., & Lantolf, J. P. (1994). Negative feedback as ...
  • Amarien, N. (1997). Interlanguage Pragmatics: A Study of Refusal Strategies ...
  • B ardovi-Harlig, K. (2001). Evaluating the empirical evidence. Grounds for. ...
  • B ardovi-Harlig, K., & Hartford, B. (1990). Congruence in native ...
  • B ardovi-Harlig, K., & Mahan-Taylor, R. (2003). Teaching pragmatics. Washington, ...
  • Blum-Kulka, S., House, J., & Kasper, G. (1989). Investigating cross-cultural ...
  • Cutting, J. (2002). Pragmatics and discours, A resource book for ...
  • Donato, R. (1994). Collective scaffolding in second language learning.In J. ...
  • Geranpayeh, A. R. D. E. S. H. I. R. (2003). ...
  • Gibbons, J. (2003). Forensic linguistics: An introduction to language in ...
  • Hashemi Shahraki, S., Ketabi, S., & Barati, H. (2015). Dynamic ...
  • Haywood, H. C., & C. S. Lidz (2007). Dynamic assessmemf ...
  • Jalilifar, A. (2009). Request strategies: Cro ss-sectional study of Iranian ...
  • Kasper, G., & Rose, K. R. (1999). Pragmatics and SLA. ...
  • The _ I _ _ _ _ _ _ November ...
  • Kasper, G., & Rose, K. R. (Eds.). (2001). Pragmatics in ...
  • Kondo, S. (2008). Effects on pragmatic development through awarene s-raising ...
  • Lantolf, J. P. (1996). SLA theory building: "Letting all the ...
  • Lantolf, J. P. (2000). Sociocultural theory and second language learning. ...
  • Lantlof, J.P. (2009). Dynamic assessmemt: The dialectio integration ofinstruction and ...
  • Lantolf, J.P., & Aljafreh, A. (1995). Second language learning in ...
  • Lantolf, J. P., & Poehner, M. E. (2006). Dynamic assessment ...
  • Lantolf J. P., & Poehner M E. (Eds.) (2008). Sociocultural ...
  • Lantolf, J. P., & Poehner, M. (2011). Dynamic assessmemt in ...
  • Lidz, T. H. E. O. D. O. R. E. (1978). ...
  • Lidz, C. S. E. (1987). Dynamic assessment An interactional approach ...
  • Mahani, S. T. (2012). A Cross-Section al Study of Iranian ...
  • Mehri, E., & Amerian, M. (2015). Challenges to dynamic assessmemt ...
  • Myles, F., Hooper, J., & Mitchell, R. (1998). Rote or ...
  • Poehner, M. E. (2005). Dynamic assessmemf of oral proficiency among ...
  • Poehner, M.E. (2007). Beyond the test: L2 dynamic assessmet and ...
  • Poehner, M. E. (2009). Group dynamic assessment: Mediation for the ...
  • Poehner, M. E., & Lantolf, J. P. (2005). Dynamic assessment ...
  • Razavi, A., & Tabatabaei, O. (2014a). The Effect of Dynamic ...
  • The _ I _ _ _ _ _ _ November ...
  • Razavi, A., & Tabatabaei, O. (2014a). The Effect of Dynamic ...
  • Razavi, A., & Tabatabaei, O. (2014b). IRANIAN EFL LEARNERS 'USING ...
  • Roschelle, J., & Teasley, S. D. (1995). The construction of ...
  • Sternberg, R. J., & Grigorenko, E. L. (2002). Dynamic testing.The ...
  • Sahragard, R., & Javanmardi, F. (2011). English Speech Act Realization ...
  • Swain, M. (2000). The output hypothesis and beyond: Mediating acquisition ...
  • Swain, M. (2006). Languaging, agency and collaboration in advanced language ...
  • Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (1995). Problems in output and ...
  • Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (2001). Focus On form through ...
  • Swain, M., & Watanabe, Y. (2013). Languaging: Collaborative dialogue as ...
  • Taguchi, N. (2006). Analysis of appropriatenes S in a speech ...
  • Tajeddin Z., & Tayabipour, F. (2012). The Effect of Dynamic ...
  • Tanck, S. (2002). Speech act sets of refusal and complaint: ...
  • Van Compernolle, R. A., & Kinginger, C. (2013). Promoting metapragmatic ...
  • Van Compernolle, R.A., & Williams, L. (2012). Promoting sociolinguistic competence ...
  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1962). Thought and language. Edited and translated ...
  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of ...
  • The _ I _ _ _ _ _ _ November ...
  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1987). The collected Works of L. S. ...
  • Vygotsky, L.S. (1996). A n to logiagu mannojpsikh ologii [Anthology ...
  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1998). _ Problem of Age.InThe Collected Works ...
  • Wells, G. (1992). _ centrality of talk in education. Thinking ...
  • Wertsch, J. V. (1985). Vygotsky and the Social Formmation of ...
  • Partially adopted from Hutchby and Wooffit (2008) ...
  • The _ I _ _ _ _ _ _ November ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع