The Role of Explicit Correction versus Metalinguistic Corrective Feedback in Increasing Iranian EFL Learners’ Oral Proficiency

Publish Year: 1395
نوع سند: مقاله کنفرانسی
زبان: English
View: 425

This Paper With 10 Page And PDF and WORD Format Ready To Download

  • Certificate
  • من نویسنده این مقاله هستم

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این Paper:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

ELSCONF04_157

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 19 خرداد 1396

Abstract:

Speaking is an interactive skill and requires the ability to co-operate in the management of speaking turns. It also typically takes place in real time with little time for detailed planning. Speaking is one of the four macro skills tobe developed as a means of effective communication in both first and second language learning contexts. In theEnglish as a Foreign Language (EFL) pedagogy environment, how to increase speaking competence andconfidence for undergraduate students tends to be a crucial question among instructors (Thornbury, 2005). Optimal learning of English, however, requires a balanced mastery of the four skills (Listening, Speaking,Reading, and Writing). Nonetheless, this paper concerns itself with probing students’ development of the speakingskill. Throughout the current paper, we made it our point to address three main questions: (1) Does explicitcorrective feedback have any significant effect on increasing Iranian EFL learners’ oral proficiency (2)Does metalinguistic corrective feedback have any significant effect on increasing Iranian EFL learners’ oralproficiency And (3) is there any significant difference between explicit and metalinguistic feedback types inincreasing Iranian EFL learners’ oral proficiency For the purpose of the study, 60 lower- intermediate Iranian EFL learners taking speaking course for English as a Foreign Language (EFL) at Science and Art University in Yazd, Iran, participated in this experimental study. The participants were divided into two groups and each groupreceived different feedback types. The first group received explicit correction by the teacher in their speakingtask, while the second group received the metalinguistic type of feedback. So, two paired-sample t-tests were conducted to measure the significant difference between the two groups of learners. The results of the analysisrevealed that both explicit and metalinguistic corrective feedback have significant roles in increasing EFL learners’ oral proficiency.

Keywords:

Authors

Najmeh Dehghani

Yazd University

مراجع و منابع این Paper:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این Paper را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود Paper لینک شده اند :
  • Brown, H. D. (2007). Principles of Language Learning and Teaching ...
  • Carroll, S. & Swain, M. (1993). Explicit and implicit negative ...
  • Carroll, S. (2001). Input and evidence: The raw material of ...
  • Ellis, R., Loewen, S., & Erlam, R. (2006). Implicit and ...
  • Ellis, R. (2009). A typology of written corrective feedback types. ...
  • Havranek, G. & Cesnik, H. (2003). Factors affecting the Success ...
  • Long, M. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment i ...
  • Long, _ Robinson, P. (1998). "Focus on form: Theory, research ...
  • Lyster, R. (2004). Differential effects of prompts and recasts in ...
  • Lyster, L., & Ranta, L. (1997). Corrective feedback and learner ...
  • doi: 10. 1) 17/S0272263 197001034 ...
  • Mackey, A., & Gass, S. M. (2005). Second language research: ...
  • Muranoi, H. 2000). Focus-on-form through interaction enhancemen: Integrating formal instruction ...
  • Nagata, N. (1993). Intelligent computer feedback for second language instruction. ...
  • Panova, I., & Lyster, R. (2002). Patters of corrective feedback ...
  • Thornbury, S. (2005). How to Teach Speaking. Harlow, Essex, England: ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع