Advertisement Mesmerisation: A CDA of Metadiscourse Markers in Iranian Language Institutes Advertisements

Publish Year: 1395
نوع سند: مقاله کنفرانسی
زبان: English
View: 441

This Paper With 8 Page And PDF Format Ready To Download

  • Certificate
  • من نویسنده این مقاله هستم

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این Paper:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

ICRSIE02_292

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 11 مرداد 1396

Abstract:

Metadiscourse markers among rhetorical shibboleths can play significant roles in maximizing or minimizing commitments and solidarity. Nevertheless, studies pertinent to the effects of metadiscourse markers in language institutes advertisements seem to be remarkably meager. To this goal, the present study investigated the metadiscourse strategies utilized by the Iranian language institutes and those in other EFL/ESL countries. In fact, this analysis was grounded in Fairclough s assumptions in critical discourse analysis (CDA), claiming that ideologies reside in texts or talks which are open to diverse interpretation that it is not possible to read off ideologies from texts and talks that texts and talks are open to diverse interpretations (Fairclough, 1995). Accordingly, a bottom–up method of analysis was adopted to analyze how advertisements can mesmerize majority of people in terms of metadiscourse markers. The study indicated that the frequencies were significantly different, and the functions of such devices cross-linguistically differed in such a way that diverse tendencies towards using a variety of metadiscourse markers were highlighted.

Authors

Naghmeh Fathi

Department of English Language , Faculty of Humanities , Dezful Branch Islamic Azad University, Dezful, Iran

مراجع و منابع این Paper:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این Paper را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود Paper لینک شده اند :
  • Batstone, R. (1995). Grammar in discourse: Attitude and deniability. In ...
  • Principle & practice in applied linguistics. Oxford, England: Oxford University ...
  • B lonmert, J. (2005) _ Discourse: Key topics in so ...
  • Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power. London, England: Longman. ...
  • Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical discourse analysis. London, England: Longman. ...
  • Fairclough, N. L., & Wodak, R. (1997). Critical discourse analysis. ...
  • Halliday, M.A.K. (1978). An interpretation of the functional relationship between ...
  • Hinkel, E. (2009). The effects of essay topics on modal ...
  • Hood, S. (2004). Appraising research: taking a stance in academic ...
  • Hyland, K. (1998). Hedging in scientific research articles. Amsterdann, Netherlands: ...
  • Hyland, K. (2000). Disciplinary discourses: Social interactions in academic writing. ...
  • Hyland, K. (2001a) Bringing in the reader: addressee features in ...
  • Ivanic, R. (1998) Writing and identity: The Discoursal construction of ...
  • Johnstone, B. (2008). Discourse analysis. Oxford, England: Blackwell Publishing. ...
  • Kuo, C.-H. (1999) The use of personal pronouns: role relationships ...
  • Myers, G. (1989) The pragmatics of politeness in scientific articles. ...
  • Nivales, M1. L. (2010). Hedging in college research papers: Inplications ...
  • S alager-Meyer, F. (1997). I think that perhaps you should: ...
  • Titscher, S., Meyer, MI., wodak, R. and Vetter, E. (2000). ...
  • Van Dijk, T. (1987). Handbook of discourse analysis, 4 vols. ...
  • Van Dijk, T. (1996). Discourse, power and access. In C.R. ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع