Testing Soccer League Competition Algorithm in Comparison with Ten PopularMeta-heuristic Algorithms for Sizing Optimization of Truss Structures

Publish Year: 1396
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: English
View: 356

This Paper With 11 Page And PDF Format Ready To Download

  • Certificate
  • من نویسنده این مقاله هستم

این Paper در بخشهای موضوعی زیر دسته بندی شده است:

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این Paper:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_IJE-30-7_001

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 23 دی 1396

Abstract:

Recently, many meta-heuristic algorithms are proposed for optimization of various problems. Some ofthem originally are presented for continuous optimization problems and some others are just applicablefor discrete ones. In the literature, sizing optimization of truss structures is one of the discreteoptimization problems which is solved by many meta-heuristic algorithms. In this paper, in order todiscover an efficient and reliable algorithm for optimization of truss structures, a discrete optimizer,entitled Soccer League Competition (SLC) algorithm and ten popular and powerful solvers areexamined and statistical analysis is carried out for them. The fundamental idea of SLC algorithm isinspired from a professional soccer league and based on the competitions among teams to achievebetter ranking and players to be the best. For optimization purpose and convergence of the initialpopulation to the global optimum, different teams compete to take the possession of the best ratingpositions in the league table and the internal competitions are taken place between players in each teamfor personal improvements. Recently, SLC as a multi-population algorithm with developed operatorshas been applied for optimization of various problems. In this paper, for demonstrating theperformance of the different solvers for optimal design of truss structures, five numerical exampleswill be optimized and the results show that proposed SLC algorithm is able to find better solutionsamong other algorithms. In other words, SLC can discover new local optimal solutions for someexamples where other algorithms fail to find that one.

Authors

N Moosavian

Department of Civil Engineering, University of British Columbia, Applied Science Lane, Vancouver, BC, Canada

H Moosavian

Department of Civil Engineering (Structural Engineering), Sharif University of Technology, Tehran, Iran