A Comparative study of the Use of Discourse Markers in Spoken Narratives by Teenager EFL Learners in Persian and English

Publish Year: 1396
نوع سند: مقاله کنفرانسی
زبان: English
View: 361

متن کامل این Paper منتشر نشده است و فقط به صورت چکیده یا چکیده مبسوط در پایگاه موجود می باشد.
توضیح: معمولا کلیه مقالاتی که کمتر از ۵ صفحه باشند در پایگاه سیویلیکا اصل Paper (فول تکست) محسوب نمی شوند و فقط کاربران عضو بدون کسر اعتبار می توانند فایل آنها را دریافت نمایند.

  • Certificate
  • من نویسنده این مقاله هستم

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این Paper:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

ELSCONF05_151

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 26 مرداد 1397

Abstract:

Discourse markers (DMs) constitute one of the several ways of performing the illocutionary act of acknowledging conversational discourse. The study of discourse markers types and functions has been of much interest to several applied linguists. However, the comparison between the use of discourse markers by L2 learners’ narrations in L1and L2 has not been appropriately studied yet. The main purpose of this study was to explore the types and frequency of DMs in Persian and English oral production by Iranian teenager EFL learners and to compare and contrast types and frequency of DMs used by Iranian teenager EFL learners in Persian and English. In so doing, 20 female Iranian teenagers were selected based on their scores on the Oxford placement test. They were met and interviewed and asked to narrate the events in the picture stories in both English and Persian. Their oralproductions were recorded. Finally, the voices were transcribed verbatim and DMs were highlighted. The DMs were coded in terms of their function in line with Fraser’s (1999) model. Types of DMs in English and Persian were identified and the frequencies of each were counted. The data were analyzed through descriptive statistics and inferential statistics (Chi-square). The results indicated that Iranian teenagers used 8 types of discourse markers while producing narrations orally in English: filled pauses, adding, illustrating, contrast, sequencing, comparison,cause and effect, and time. On the other hand, the participants used only four types of DMs in Persian oral productions. Results also showed that the differences between the type and frequency of some of the discourse markers were statistically significant (p<0.05). The findings have theoretical and practical implications for contrastive linguists, language teachers and practitioners, as well as material developers

Authors

Asma Azimi

MA candidate in TEFL Islamic Azad University, Tehran-west Branch, Iran

Tayebeh Fani

Sama Technical and Vocational Training College, Islamic Azad University, Tehran Branch, Tehran, Iran