Publisher of Iranian Journals and Conference Proceedings

Please waite ..
Publisher of Iranian Journals and Conference Proceedings
Login |Register |Help |عضویت کتابخانه ها
Paper
Title

The Comparative Effect of Using Visual and Auditory Input Enhancement on the Use of Cohesive Devices in the Writing of Iranian EFL Filed-dependent and independent Learners

Year: 1396
COI: JR_LGHOR-1-2_004
Language: EnglishView: 306
This Paper With 15 Page And PDF Format Ready To Download

Buy and Download

با استفاده از پرداخت اینترنتی بسیار سریع و ساده می توانید اصل این Paper را که دارای 15 صفحه است به صورت فایل PDF در اختیار داشته باشید.
آدرس ایمیل خود را در کادر زیر وارد نمایید:

Authors

Mohadeseh Fani - Department of English Language and Literature, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
Mohammad Hashamdar - Department of English Language and Literature, Karaj Branch, Islamic Azad University

Abstract:

Writing has been a troublesome skill for Iranian EFL learners as it needs accurate planning and acceptable coherence. The current study aimed as investigating the comparative effect of visual and auditory input enhancement on the use of cohesive devices in the writing of Iranian EFL learners. Participants of the study were 60 field dependent and 60 field independent language learners at intermediate level of language proficiency. The study adopted a pretest posttest design and data were analyzed through employing statistical test of ANCOVA. Results of statistical analysis showed that visual input enhancement was significantly more effective than auditory input enhancement in terms of their effects on the use of cohesive devices in both field dependent and field independent language learners. Results were discussed and implications of study were also presented.

Keywords:

Cohesive devices , input enhancement , L2 writing , Visual and auditory input enhancement

Paper COI Code

This Paper COI Code is JR_LGHOR-1-2_004. Also You can use the following address to link to this article. This link is permanent and is used as an article registration confirmation in the Civilica reference:

https://civilica.com/doc/857486/

How to Cite to This Paper:

If you want to refer to this Paper in your research work, you can simply use the following phrase in the resources section:
Fani, Mohadeseh and Hashamdar, Mohammad,1396,The Comparative Effect of Using Visual and Auditory Input Enhancement on the Use of Cohesive Devices in the Writing of Iranian EFL Filed-dependent and independent Learners,https://civilica.com/doc/857486

مراجع و منابع این Paper:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این Paper را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود Paper لینک شده اند :

  • Alanen, R. (1995). Input enhancement and rule presentation in second ...
  • Al-Meni, A. M. O. (2008). An investigation of the effect ...
  • Altenberg, B. & M. Tapper. (1998). The use of adverbial ...
  • Altun, A., & Cakan, M. (2006). Undergraduate students’ academic achievement, ...
  • Barcroft, J. (2003). Distinctiveness and bidirectional effects in input enhancement ...
  • Basturkmen, H. (2002). Learner observation of, and reflection on, spoken ...
  • Brown, H. D. (1994). Principles of language learning and teaching ...
  • Brown, H. D. (2000). Teaching by principles: An interactive approach ...
  • Castro, C. D. (2004). Cohesion and the social construction of ...
  • Clark, R. C. & Lyons, C. (2004). Graphics for Learning: ...
  • Crossley, S., Kyle, K., & McNamara, D. (2016). The development ...
  • Dahl, D. A. (1981). The role of experience in speech ...
  • Dueraman, B. (2007). Cohesion and Coherence in English Essays Written ...
  • Ellis, R. (2008). The study of second language acquisition. Oxford: ...
  • Fei, D. (2006). The Effect of the use of adverbial ...
  • Gascoigne, C. (2006). Explicit Input Enhancement: Effects on Target and ...
  • Ghasemi, M. (2013). An investigation into the use of cohesive ...
  • Håkansson, G. (1986). Quantitative aspects of teacher talk. In G. ...
  • Han, Z-H., Park E., & Combs, C. (2008). Textual enhancement ...
  • Hinkel, E. (2001). Matters of cohesion in L2 academic texts. ...
  • Izumi, S. (2002). Output, input enhancement and the noticing hypothesis: ...
  • Jamieson, J. (1992). The cognitive styles of reflection/impulsivity and field-independence/ ...
  • Jourdenais, R., Ota, M., Stauffer, S., Boyson, B., & Doughty, ...
  • Khodareza, P. & Ashouri, Sh. (2016). Analysis of cohesive devices ...
  • Kim, Y. (2006). Effects of input elaboration on vocabulary acquisition ...
  • Leeman, J., Arteagoitia, I., Fridman, B., & Doughty, C. (1995). ...
  • Leki, I. (2003). A challenge to second language writing professionals: ...
  • Littlemore, J. (2001). An empirical study of the relationship between ...
  • Mohammed, A. S. (2015). Conjunctions as cohesive devices in the ...
  • Moini, M. R., & Kheirkhah. F. (2016). Use of cohesive ...
  • Moriarty, S.E. (1994). Visual communication as a primary system. Journal ...
  • Mukherjee, N. & Roy, D. (2003). A Visual context-aware multimodal ...
  • Narita, M., Sato, C., & Sugiura, M. (2004). Connector usage ...
  • Japanese EFL learners. Proceedings of 4th International Conference on Language ...
  • Norris, J. M., & Ortega, L. (2000). Effectiveness of L2 ...
  • Pallant, J. (2010). SPSS Survival Manual (4th edition). Berkshire: McGrew-Hill. ...
  • Peters, E. (2012). Learning German formulaic sequences: The effect of ...
  • Petterson, R. (2004). Gearing communications to the cognitive needs of ...
  • Pishghadam, R., & Saboori, F. (2011). A Qualitative analysis of ...
  • Robert, D. (1986). From learning to acquisition Foreign language development ...
  • Rostami, Gh., Gholami, H., & Piri, S. (2016). A Contrastive ...
  • Schmidt, R. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language ...
  • Schmidt, R. (1992). Psychological mechanisms underlying second language fluency. Studies ...
  • Shi, C. (2011). A study of the relationship between cognitive ...
  • Smith, M. S. (1993). Consciousness raising and the second language ...
  • Tapper, M. (2005). Connectives in advanced EFL Learners’ written English ...
  • Vahabi, Sh. (2006). The relationship between EFL learners FD/FI cognitive ...
  • Wei-Yu Chen, C. (2006). The mixing of English in magazine ...
  • Witkin, H. A., Ottman, P. K., Raskin, E. & Karp, ...
  • Zainal, Z., & Husin, S. H. B. M. (2011). A ...

Research Info Management

Certificate | Report | من نویسنده این مقاله هستم

اطلاعات استنادی این Paper را به نرم افزارهای مدیریت اطلاعات علمی و استنادی ارسال نمایید و در تحقیقات خود از آن استفاده نمایید.

Scientometrics

The specifications of the publisher center of this Paper are as follows:
Type of center: Azad University
Paper count: 38,286
In the scientometrics section of CIVILICA, you can see the scientific ranking of the Iranian academic and research centers based on the statistics of indexed articles.

Share this page

More information about COI

COI stands for "CIVILICA Object Identifier". COI is the unique code assigned to articles of Iranian conferences and journals when indexing on the CIVILICA citation database.

The COI is the national code of documents indexed in CIVILICA and is a unique and permanent code. it can always be cited and tracked and assumed as registration confirmation ID.

Support