Designing an Accreditation Model for North Khorasan University of Medical Sciences with a Futuristic Approach

Publish Year: 1398
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: English
View: 349

This Paper With 7 Page And PDF Format Ready To Download

  • Certificate
  • من نویسنده این مقاله هستم

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این Paper:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_FMEJ-9-2_007

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 10 تیر 1398

Abstract:

Background: Accreditation process has notable effects on quality assurance in medical education and faculty development. This process determine if an institution meets or exceeds minimum standards of quality. At present, there is a lack of a standardized model of accreditation for medical University in Iran. Therefore, this study aimed to design an accreditation model for North Khorasan University of Medical Sciences with a futuristic approach. Methods: This was an exploratory sequential Mixed- methods study. The sample consisted of all vice chancellors, departments managers, administrators and executive bodies of North Khorasan University of Medical Sciences. In the qualitative phase, based on the purposeful sampling method, 10 in-depth semi-structured interviews were performed. After data saturation and identifying key concepts, the literature review was performed to elucidate the theoretical foundations of University Accreditation. In the second phase, based on purposeful sampling method, 259 participants were selected to complete the 75 questions using a researcher made questionnaire. 10 professors evaluated the face and content validity of the questionnaire. An exploratory analysis of content undertaken to identify the 12 main factors of accreditation model and a confirmatory factor analysis was employed to verify the construct validity. A Cronbach alpha coefficient of 0.825 indicated the excellent reliability of the questionnaire. SPSS software and AMOS version 24 were used to analyze the data. Results: Based on the results of exploratory factor analysis, 12 factors were identified as model s main factors, including 1) organizational management (5.21), 2) strategy formulation (4.90), 3) research (4.39), 4) mission and goals (4.13), 5) students (3.84), 6) Informatics Technology (3.74), 7) Human Resources (3.57), 8) Planning (3.36), 9) Faculty Services (3.11), 10) educational facilities (2.86), 11) financial factors (2.48), and 12) education (2.26). The sum of factors variance percentages showed that the predictive power of the model is equal to 58.47%. Conclusion: The model has been fitted to measure the accreditation of North Khorasan University of Medical Sciences with a futuristic approach. Therefore, it is suggested that this model can be evaluated for accreditation of similar medical University. 

Keywords:

Accreditation , Future Studies , University of medical sciences , Model

Authors

Jamileh Ramazani

Nursing and Midwifery College, Bojnourd Branch, Islamic Azad University, Bojnourd, Iran

Taraneh Enayati

Department of Educational Management, Sari Branch, Islamic Azad University, Sari, Iran

Kioumars Niazazari

Department of Educational Management, Sari Branch, Islamic Azad University, Sari, Iran

مراجع و منابع این Paper:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این Paper را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود Paper لینک شده اند :
  • Fugedi G, Lam J, Belicza E. Accreditation in health care. ...
  • Lubinescu ES, Ratcliff JL, Gaffney MA. Two continuums collide: Accreditation ...
  • Cleveland EC, Dahn BT, Lincoln TM, Safer M, Podesta M, ...
  • Hoda reda HEA, F SW. Factors affecting implementation of accreditation ...
  • Correa JE, Turrioni JB, de Paiva AP, Paes VC, Balestrassi ...
  • Santos RS, Abreu ACJRPeD. Implementation of an EFQM model in ...
  • Accrediting Commission for Senior Colleges and Universities: Handbook of Accreditation ...
  • Lane J, Barnhart S, Luboga S, Arudo J, Urassa D, ...
  • Tabrizi JS, Gharibi F, Wilson AJ. Advantages and disadvantages of ...
  • Hamm MS. Quality Improvement Initiatives in Accreditation: Private Sector Examples and ...
  • Blouin D, Tekian A, Kamin C, Harris IB. The impact ...
  • Sethi A, Javaid A. Accreditation system and standards for medical ...
  • Mirzazadeh A, Tavakoli S, Naseripoor M. Comparison of graduate medical ...
  • Rezaeian M, Jalili Z, Nakhaee N, Shirazi JJ, Jafari AJIjoph. ...
  • Tabatabaei S. The necessity of futures studies in medical education ...
  • Naseri N, Salehi Sh, Khalifezadeh A, A Y. Developing clinical ...
  • Pazargadi M, Peyravi H A, Pourkhoshbakht Y, Alavi Mojed H, ...
  • Handbook of Accreditation: 2017 Edition 2017 [Internet] 2017 Jan 12 ...
  • Basic Medical Education WFME global standards for quality improvement the ...
  • Ruben B. Higher education assessment: Linking accreditation standards and the ...
  • EFQM Model 2013 [Internet] 2013 Jan 10 [updated 2013 May ...
  • National Institute of Standards and Technology. Baldrige Excellence Builder: Key ...
  • Laurett R, Mendes L. EFQM model’s application in the context ...
  • ŠImunović VJ, Sonntag HG, Hren D, Dørup J, Krivokuća Z, ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع