An Investigation of the Application of Different Methods of Student evaluation by clinical education groups of Birjand University of Medical Sciences

Publish Year: 1397
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: English
View: 307

This Paper With 5 Page And PDF Format Ready To Download

  • Certificate
  • من نویسنده این مقاله هستم

این Paper در بخشهای موضوعی زیر دسته بندی شده است:

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این Paper:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_FMEJ-8-1_004

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 10 تیر 1398

Abstract:

Introduction: Evaluation is an effective factor to assure the quality of education. Evaluation of clinical education assessment methods, as the most important step in educating certified physicians, is essential in order to determine the strengths and eliminate the defects. Therefore, this study was conducted to assess the evaluation methods of students by clinical education groups of Birjand University of Medical Sciences.  Method: This is a descriptive-cross sectional study conducted in the academic year of 2016-2017. The statistical population consisted of interns in clinical departments of Birjand University of Medical Sciences who were selected by purposeful sampling. The tool for evaluating the researcher-made checklist was based on the ACGME model, whose content and formal validity were confirmed by experts. After collecting data, data were recorded and analyzed in Excel software.  Results: The results of this study showed that most of the tests conducted in internship courses were in the fields of written method, key points and history (76.66% of the clinical groups); in the evaluation by the supervisor, oral exam (40 percent), and in the multi-source evaluation or 360-degree area, only from the work folder (0.33 percent), and in the field of clinical simulation, none of the tests have been used for evaluation.  Conclusion: Considering that the tests evaluated only the knowledge and also evaluated the skills in limited cases, it is suggested that, while creating the ground for increasing the awareness of the professors about other tests, an instruction to necessitate the evaluation of all areas of learning in all clinical sections should be developed.

Keywords:

Key Words: Clinical Evaluation Methods , Medical education , Clinical Groups

Authors

Farshid Abedi

Infectious Diseases Research Center, Birjand University of Medical Sciences, Birjand, Iran| Family Medicine Department, Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, IRAN

Atefeh Sahebkari

Department of Medical Education, School of Medicine, Birjand University of Medical Sciences, Birjand, Iran

Khaironnesa Ramazanzade

Medical of Education Research Center, Birjand University of Medical Sciences, Birjand, Iran| PhD. Student of Curriculum Planning ,Birjand University, Biriand, Iran

مراجع و منابع این Paper:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این Paper را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود Paper لینک شده اند :
  • Malakooti N, Bahadoran P, Ehsanpoor S. Assessment of the midwifery ...
  • Owston R. Models and Methods for Evaluation. Handbook of Research ...
  • Alizadeh M, Mazouchian H. Letter to editor. Iranian Journal of ...
  • Al Kadri HM, Al-Moamary MS, van der Vleuten C. Students ...
  • Norton* L. Using assessment criteria as learning criteria: a case ...
  • Khademi Zare H, Fakhrzad MB. Integration of collaborative management and ...
  • Javadinia SA. Training and Evaluation in Medicine Effective or Ineffective: ...
  • Cushing A. Developments in attitude and professional behaviour assessment, oral ...
  • Shumway JM, Harden RM. AMEE Guide No. 25: The assessment ...
  • Mesrabady J. Introduce and accreditation of concept map evaluation in ...
  • Mousavi M, Maghami H. Comparison of new and old educational ...
  • Komeili G, Rezaei G. Study of student evaluation by basic ...
  • Kojury J, Rivaz S, Amini M, Rivaz M. Assessment of ...
  • Khodayarian M, Vanaki Z, Navipour H, Vaezi A. The impact ...
  • O’Neill G. Choice of assessment methods within a module: students’ ...
  • Francis RA. An investigation into the receptivity of undergraduate students ...
  • O Shaughnessy SM, Joyce P. Summative and formative assessment in ...
  • Emery C, Kramer K, Tian R. Return to academic standards: ...
  • Sproule P. Student evaluation of teaching: a methodological critique of ...
  • Rose SH, Long TR. Accreditation council for graduate medical education ...
  • Mirzaei A, Kawarizadeh F, Lohrabian V, Yegane Z. Evaluation Methods ...
  • Rasolinejad SA, Vakihi Z, Fakharion E, Mosayebi Z, Moniri R. ...
  • Haghshenas M, Vahidshahi K, Mahmudi M, Shahbaznejad L, Parvinnejad N, ...
  • McCoubrie P. Improving the fairness of multiple-choice questions: a literature ...
  • Shakoornia A, Khosravi A, Shariati A, Zarei A. Survey on ...
  • Du Y, Yu K, Li X, Wang F, Wang T. ...
  • Howley LD. Performance assessment in medical education: where we’ve been ...
  • Newble DI, Jaeger K. The effect of assessments and examinations ...
  • Jarahi L, Shojaghalehdokhtar L , Mousavibazaz M, Erfanian M. Educational ...
  • Hekmatpou D. Effect of Portfolio Based Evaluation on Accuracy of ...
  • Bahreini M, Shahamat S, Moattari M, Akaberian S, Sharifi S, ...
  • Ahmadi A, Alian negad MR. The effect of e-portfolio on ...
  • kamali f, shakour m, Yousefy A. Peer Assessment in evaluation ...
  • Kokeyo CA, Oluoch J. Self Evaluation: A Case Study of ...
  • Sahebalzamani M, Farahani H, Mehrabani E, Shahbazi M. Validity and ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع