Sarah Trainor - Brigham and Women’s Hospital Boston, MA, USA
Jamie Collins - Brigham and Women’s Hospital Boston, MA, USA
Hannah Mulvey - Brigham and Women’s Hospital Boston, MA, USA
Wolfgang Fitz - Brigham and Women’s Hospital Boston, MA, USA

Background: Various sizes of implants need to be available during surgery. The purpose of this paper is to comparebody height and shoe size with implant sizes in patients who underwent total knee replacement surgery to see whichbiomarker is a better predictor for preoperative planning to determine implant size.Methods: A total of 100 knees, belonging to 50 females and 50 males, were observed. Participants’ body height andshoe size were collected and correlated to implant sizes of a current, frequently used, standard total knee replacement(TKR) implant. The femoral anteroposterior and mediolateral width and the tibial anteroposterior and mediolateral widthwere correlated with height and shoe size.Results: The correlation between shoe size and the four knee implant dimensions, femoral AP, ML, and tibial AP andML were higher than the correlations between height and the same four dimensions.Conclusion: The results indicated that shoe size is a better predictor of component dimensions than is body height.

Biomarkers, Implant size, Preoperative planning, Shoe size, Total knee replacement