Comparison of the Conventional and New Techniques of Laryngeal Mask Airway Insertion in Postoperative Sore Throat

Publish Year: 1398
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: English
View: 271

This Paper With 6 Page And PDF Format Ready To Download

  • Certificate
  • من نویسنده این مقاله هستم

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این Paper:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_RCM-6-2_003

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 16 مهر 1398

Abstract:

Introduction: The present study aimed to compare the conventional and new techniques of laryngeal mask airway (LMA) insertion in terms of the rate and severity of postoperative sore throat.Methods: This clinical trial was conducted on 80 patients referring to Khatam-ol Anbia Hospitalin Mashhad, Iran for phacoemulsification. The patients underwent general anesthesia, and the conventional technique was performed by pushing down the LMA with the dominant hand with the simultaneous support of the index finger of the dominant hand. In addition, the new technique was carried out by conducting the LMA with the dominant hand and simultaneous use of the non-dominant hand to prevent the contact of the cuff with the palate and oropharynx tissues. All the variables were assessed one day after the operation. Results: The rate of postoperative sore throat was 7.5% in the conventional technique and 1.25% in the new technique. Comparison of the rate of postoperative sore throat between the study groups showed a significant difference in this regard (P=0.048). The overall rate of postoperative sore throat one day after the operation was 3.75%, while it was estimated at 3.75% in the conventional technique. However, comparison of the rate of postoperative sore throat between the study groups demonstrated no significant difference in this regard (P=0.077). Conclusion: Considering the higher effectiveness of the new LMA insertion technique compared to the conventional one technique in the prevention of preventing mucosal bleeding and postoperative sore throat, the new this technique is recommended as a can be used as a safe alternative to for the conventional technique. In the new LMA insertion technique, the this method, the rate of postoperative sore throat decreased due to the declined diminished due to reduced pressure on the tissues of the oropharynx tissues.

Authors

Mohammad Gharavi Fard

Department of Anesthesia, Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.

Mohsen Akhondi

Department of Anesthesia, Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.

مراجع و منابع این Paper:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این Paper را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود Paper لینک شده اند :
  • Ghai B, Wig J. Comparison of different techniques of laryngeal ...
  • Eglen M, Kuvaki B, Günenç F, et al. Comparison of ...
  • Choo CY, Koay CK, Yoong CS. A randomised controlled trial ...
  • Kumar P, Kaur B, Basra AK, et al. Comparing the ...
  • Mizutamari E, Yano T, Ushijima K, et al. A comparison ...
  • Bashir I, Masood N. Prophylaxis of postintubation sore throat by ...
  • Tanaka Y, Nakayama T, Nishimori M, et al. Lidocaine for ...
  • Park PG, Choi GJ, Kim WJ, et al. A comparative ...
  • Brimacombe JR, Berry AM. Mallampati grade and laryngeal mask placement. ...
  • Monem A, Khan FA. Laryngeal mask airway insertion anaesthesia and ...
  • Karim Y, Swanson D. Comparison of blind tracheal intubation through ...
  • Orde S, Celenza A, Pinder M. A randomised trial comparing ...
  • Saeedi M, Hajiseyedjavadi H, Seyedhosseini J, et al. Comparison of ...
  • Corda DM, Robards CB, Rice MJ, et al. Clinical application ...
  • Seet E, Rajeev S, Firoz T, et al. Safety and ...
  • Zhu XY, Lin BC, Zhang QS, et al. A prospective ...
  • Davies PR, Tighe SQ, Greenslade GL, et al. Laryngeal mask ...
  • Ruetzler K, Roessler B, Potura L, et al. Performance and ...
  • Mizutamari E, Yano T, Ushijima K, et al. A comparison ...
  • Peirovifar A, Eydi M, Mirinejhad MM, et al. Comparison of ...
  • Seet E, Yousaf F, Gupta S. Use of manometry for ...
  • Choi YM, Cha SM, Kang H, et al. The clinical ...
  • Brimacombe J. Analysis of 1500 laryngeal mask uses by one ...
  • Krishna HM, Kamath S, Shenoy L. Insertion of LMA Classic ...
  • Soh CR, Ng AS. Laryngeal mask airway insertion in paediatric ...
  • Yun MJ, Hwang JW, Park SH, et al. The 90 ...
  • Wakeling HG, Butler PJ, Baxter PJ. The laryngeal mask airway: ...
  • Navaratnam S, Tayler S. The laryngeal mask--another insertion technique. Anaesth ...
  • Dingley J, Baynham P, Swart M, et al. Ease of ...
  • Dingley J, Whitehead MJ, Wareham K. A comparative study of ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع