ناشر تخصصی کنفرانس های ایران

لطفا کمی صبر نمایید

Publisher of Iranian Journals and Conference Proceedings

Please waite ..
Publisher of Iranian Journals and Conference Proceedings
Login |Register |Help |عضویت کتابخانه ها
Paper
Title

Pharyngeal Packing during Rhinoplasty: Advantages and Disadvantages

Pharyngeal Packing during Rhinoplasty: Advantages and Disadvantages
Year: 1394
COI: JR_IJOTO-27-6_003
Language: EnglishView: 215
This Paper With 6 Page And PDF Format Ready To Download

Buy and Download

با استفاده از پرداخت اینترنتی بسیار سریع و ساده می توانید اصل این Paper را که دارای 6 صفحه است به صورت فایل PDF در اختیار داشته باشید.
آدرس ایمیل خود را در کادر زیر وارد نمایید:

Authors

Majid Razavi - Cardiac Anesthesia Research Center, Imam-Reza Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Science, Mashhad, Iran.
Mehryar Taghavi Gilani - Cardiac Anesthesia Research Center, Imam-Reza Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Science, Mashhad, Iran.
Ali Reza Bameshki - Cardiac Anesthesia Research Center, Imam-Reza Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Science, Mashhad, Iran.
Reza Behdani - General Practitioner, Young Researchers Club and elites, Mashhad Branch, Islamic Azad University, Mashhad, Iran.

Abstract:

Introduction: Controversy remains as to the advantages and disadvantages of pharyngeal packing during septorhinoplasty. Our study investigated the effect of pharyngeal packing on postoperative nausea and vomiting and sore throat following this type of surgery or septorhinoplasty.   Materials and Methods: This clinical trial was performed on 90 American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) I or II patients who were candidates for septorhinoplasty. They were randomly divided into two groups. Patients in the study group had received pharyngeal packing while those in the control group had not. The incidence of nausea and vomiting and sore throat based on the visual analog scale (VAS) was evaluated postoperatively in the recovery room as well as at 2, 6 and 24 hours.   Results: The incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) was 12.3%, with no significant difference between the study and control groups. Sore throat was reported in 50.5% of cases overall (56.8% on pack group and 44.4% on control). Although the severity of pain was higher in the study group at all times, the incidence in the two groups did not differ significantly.   Conclusion: The use of pharyngeal packing has no effect in reducing the incidence of nausea and vomiting and sore throat after surgery. Given that induced hypotension is used as the routine method of anesthesia in septorhinoplasty surgery, with a low incidence of hemorrhage and a high risk of unintended retention of pharyngeal packing, its routine use is not recommended for this procedure. 

Keywords:

Paper COI Code

This Paper COI Code is JR_IJOTO-27-6_003. Also You can use the following address to link to this article. This link is permanent and is used as an article registration confirmation in the Civilica reference:

https://civilica.com/doc/942944/

How to Cite to This Paper:

If you want to refer to this Paper in your research work, you can simply use the following phrase in the resources section:
Razavi, Majid and Taghavi Gilani, Mehryar and Bameshki, Ali Reza and Behdani, Reza,1394,Pharyngeal Packing during Rhinoplasty: Advantages and Disadvantages,https://civilica.com/doc/942944

مراجع و منابع این Paper:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این Paper را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود Paper لینک شده اند :

  • Elyassi H, Mousavinasab M, Rambod M, Hashemian MR, Dabbagh A. ...
  • Karbasforushan A, Hemmatpoor B, Makhsosi  BR, Mahvar T, Golfam P, ...
  • Basha SI, McCoy E,Ullah R, Kinsella JB. The efficacy of ...
  • Fennessy BG, Mannion S, Kinsella JB, O’Sullivan P. The benefits ...
  • Bisase B, Matthews NS, Lan C. Current practice and opinions ...
  • Erkalp K, Korkut YA, Meric A, Kahya V, Gedikli O, ...
  • Sharma PK, Bhakta P, Srinivasan S, Khan RM, Kaul N. ...
  • Jaiswal V, Bedford GC. Review of the use of throat ...
  • Korkut AY, Erkalp K, Erden V, Teker AM, Demirel A, ...
  • Van den Berg AA. The prophylactic antiemetic efficacy of prochlorperazine ...
  • Tay JY, Tan WK, Chen FG, Koh KF, Ho V. ...
  • Piltcher O, Lavinsky M, Lavinsky J, de Oliveira Basso PR. ...
  • Colbert S, Jackson M, Turner M, Brennan PA. Reducing the ...
  • Knepil GJ, Blackburn CW. Retained throat packs: results of a ...
  • Gan TJ. Risk factors for postoperative nausea and vomiting. Anesth ...
  • Elhakim M, Siam A, Rashed I, Hamdy MH. Topical tenoxicam ...
  • Marais J, Prescott RJ. Throat pain and pharyngeal packing: a ...
  • Research Info Management

    Certificate | Report | من نویسنده این مقاله هستم

    اطلاعات استنادی این Paper را به نرم افزارهای مدیریت اطلاعات علمی و استنادی ارسال نمایید و در تحقیقات خود از آن استفاده نمایید.

    Scientometrics

    The specifications of the publisher center of this Paper are as follows:
    Type of center: علوم پزشکی
    Paper count: 8,086
    In the scientometrics section of CIVILICA, you can see the scientific ranking of the Iranian academic and research centers based on the statistics of indexed articles.

    Share this page

    More information about COI

    COI stands for "CIVILICA Object Identifier". COI is the unique code assigned to articles of Iranian conferences and journals when indexing on the CIVILICA citation database.

    The COI is the national code of documents indexed in CIVILICA and is a unique and permanent code. it can always be cited and tracked and assumed as registration confirmation ID.

    Support