Publisher of Iranian Journals and Conference Proceedings

Please waite ..
Publisher of Iranian Journals and Conference Proceedings
Login |Register |Help |عضویت کتابخانه ها
Paper
Title

A Comparative Study on Evaluating of Knowledge and clinical Practices of Midwifery Students in the Courses of Physiopathology, Infectious and Internal Diseases and Surgery based on Objective Structured Clinical Examination and Traditional Assessment Methods

فصلنامه آینده آموزش پزشکی، دوره: 2، شماره: 4
Year: 1391
COI: JR_FMEJ-2-4_001
Language: EnglishView: 163
This Paper With 6 Page And PDF Format Ready To Download

Buy and Download

با استفاده از پرداخت اینترنتی بسیار سریع و ساده می توانید اصل این Paper را که دارای 6 صفحه است به صورت فایل PDF در اختیار داشته باشید.
آدرس ایمیل خود را در کادر زیر وارد نمایید:

Authors

Mani Mirfeizi - Department of Midwifery, Karaj Branch, Islamic Azad University, Karaj, Iran
Zahra Mehdizadeh Tourzani - Department of Midwifery, Karaj Branch, Islamic Azad University, Karaj, Iran
Touran Bahrami Babaheydari - Department of Nursing, Albourz University of Medical Sciences, Karaj, Iran
Seyedeh Zahra Mirfeizi - Rheumatic Diseases Research Center, Department of Rheumatology, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran

Abstract:

Background: Objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) is one of the best methods of evaluating the achievement of domains such as educational objectives and cognitive, emotional, and psycho-motor aspects of medical students. According to available evidences, no study has been conducted  on the evaluating of OSCE in midwifery students. The main purpose of this study was the evaluation of knowledge and clinical practices of midwifery students in the courses of physiopathology, infectious, and internal diseases and surgery based on OSCE method, compared with traditional and with the final clinical traineeship score. Methods: This study was performed on 39 midwifery students at the end of the third year of their education in Islamic Azad University of Karaj. The OSCE was performed in 10 different stations based on five practical purposes. A week later, traditional evaluation was performed using multiple choice questions and essays. Then final clinical examination was applied in next semester, when they passed their traineeship course. The scores in three evaluation methods were compared and correlation between the scores were reported. Results: The mean (Standard deviation) score of OSCE, traditional, and clinical exams were 85.29 (8.90), 62.76 (10.80) and 81.50 (3.22) respectively. Based on the results of Pearson correlation test, there was no significant difference between the three evaluation methods mutually. There was a poor correlation between scores obtained from traditional and clinical (r=0.30, P Value=0.068), traditional and OSCE (r=0.19, P Value=0.123) and clinical and OSCE (r=0.06, P Value=0.728) evaluations. Mixed mode analysis showed a significant difference in the average scores when three evaluation methods of OSCE, traditional and clinical were compared (P<0.001, F (2, 83) =91.8). Conclusions: This study showed that OSCE is a good way to evaluate midwifery students clinical skills.

Keywords:

Knowledge , Clinical competence , Objective Structured Clinical Examination , Traditional evaluation

Paper COI Code

This Paper COI Code is JR_FMEJ-2-4_001. Also You can use the following address to link to this article. This link is permanent and is used as an article registration confirmation in the Civilica reference:

https://civilica.com/doc/945111/

How to Cite to This Paper:

If you want to refer to this Paper in your research work, you can simply use the following phrase in the resources section:
Mirfeizi, Mani and Mehdizadeh Tourzani, Zahra and Bahrami Babaheydari, Touran and Mirfeizi, Seyedeh Zahra,1391,A Comparative Study on Evaluating of Knowledge and clinical Practices of Midwifery Students in the Courses of Physiopathology, Infectious and Internal Diseases and Surgery based on Objective Structured Clinical Examination and Traditional Assessment Methods,https://civilica.com/doc/945111

مراجع و منابع این Paper:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این Paper را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود Paper لینک شده اند :

  • Assadullahi P, Afshari P. A comparison of effectiveness of theoretical ...
  • Selim AA, Ramadan FH, El-Gueneidy MM, Gaafer MM. Using Objective ...
  • Brosnan M, Evans W, Brosnan E, Brown G. Implementing objective ...
  • Adamo G. Simulated and standardized patients in OSCEs: achievements and ...
  • Rushforth HE. Objective structured clinical examination (OSCE): Review of literature ...
  • Abrishamkar S, Sabouri M, Shayan Sh, Eshraghi N, Maleki L.Analyzing ...
  • Griesser MJ, Beran MC, FlaniganDC, Quackenbush M, Van Hoff C, ...
  • Wass V, Roberts C, Hoogenboom R, Jones R, Vleuten CVD. ...
  • Alinir G. Nursing students and lecturers perspectives of objective structured ...
  • Austin Z, Gregory P, Tabak D. Simulated patients vs. standardized ...
  • Newble D. Techniques for measuring clinical competence: objective structured clinical ...
  • Jünger J, Schäfer S, Roth C, Schellberg D, Friedman Ben-David ...
  • Watson R, Stimpson A, Topping A, Porock D. Clinical Competence ...
  • Rau Th, Fegert J, liebhardt H. How high are the ...
  • Dokoohaki R, Sharafi N, Rahnema sh, AzarHooshang P, Jahanbin I. ...
  • Mozafari M. Practice of senior nursing student in the cardiac ...
  • Haji Hosseini F, Sharifnia SH, Nazari R, Rezaee R, Saatsaz ...
  • Shahini N, Sanagoo A, Mahasti Jouybari L. Communication Skills and ...
  • Sadeghnejad M, Habibi R, Habibi Gh. Nursing Students and Teachers ...
  • Shaneyfelt T, Baum KD, Bell D, Feldstein D, Houston TK, ...
  • Tudiver F, Rose D, Banks B, Pfortmiller D. Reliability and ...
  • Frohna JG, Gruppen LD, Fliegel JE, Mangrulkar RS. Development of ...
  • Fernandes PT, Noronha AL, Sander JW, Bell GS, Li LM. ...
  • Saboury A, Vahid Dastjerdi E, Mahdian M, Kharazifard M. Dental ...
  • Imani M, Hosseini Tabatabaei MT: Is OSCE successful in pediatrics ...
  • Awaisu A, Abd Rahman NS, Nik Mohamed MH, Bux Rahman ...
  • Faryabi J, Farzad M, Sinaei N: Dental students perspective on ...
  • Bradley P, Humphris G. Assesing the ability of medical studens ...
  • Carraccio C, Englander R. The objective structured clinical examination. Arch ...
  • Moattari M, Abdollah-Zargar Sh, Mousavinasab M, Zare N, Beygi-Marvdast P. ...
  • Chamanzari H. Optimizing of intensive care in preventing complications of ...
  • Adib Hajbagheri M, Afazel MR, Mousavi Gh, Noorizad S. Evaluation ...

Research Info Management

Certificate | Report | من نویسنده این مقاله هستم

اطلاعات استنادی این Paper را به نرم افزارهای مدیریت اطلاعات علمی و استنادی ارسال نمایید و در تحقیقات خود از آن استفاده نمایید.

Scientometrics

The specifications of the publisher center of this Paper are as follows:
Type of center: Azad University
Paper count: 9,303
In the scientometrics section of CIVILICA, you can see the scientific ranking of the Iranian academic and research centers based on the statistics of indexed articles.

Share this page

More information about COI

COI stands for "CIVILICA Object Identifier". COI is the unique code assigned to articles of Iranian conferences and journals when indexing on the CIVILICA citation database.

The COI is the national code of documents indexed in CIVILICA and is a unique and permanent code. it can always be cited and tracked and assumed as registration confirmation ID.

Support