A review of the decision-making process based on the dual-process theory

Publish Year: 1398
نوع سند: مقاله کنفرانسی
زبان: English
View: 415

نسخه کامل این Paper ارائه نشده است و در دسترس نمی باشد

  • Certificate
  • من نویسنده این مقاله هستم

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این Paper:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

NSCMED08_553

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 15 دی 1398

Abstract:

Background and Aim : One of the cognitive functions of the brain is decision making, which refers to the process of choosing from a set of options. This process has always attracted the attention of many researchers because of its importance in psychology and management.Until now, the dominant theory in this field was unlimited rationality, but in recent years one of the most popular theories has been the dual processing theory which explains the human decision-making process under two systems 1 and 2.Methods : Our method of gathering information in this article was to search the keywords of decision making and dual processing theory in google scholar and science direct databases and to review articles in this domain between years 2010 and 2020 to investigate our questionResults : This theory has largely been able to explain the behavior of choice in the field of economics because using rationality theory we could not explain choices that are not profitable, but the dual processing theory has justified such choices. But it always faces challenges in this direction because it does not specify what distinguishes these different mental processes from one another and does not provide a detailed description of the functioning of these two systems, but rather a general theory of the possible origin of the arguments and errorsConclusion : In this article, we intended to review the research in this area to answer the question of whether the dual-processing theory has been able to provide a proper and accurate picture of the decision-making process and to answer the questions in this region. We have found that this theory may start a new path, but there is still a long way to go and there are many vague issues to address.