Image-based versus atlas-based patient-specific S-value assessment for Samarium-153 EDTMP cancer palliative care: A short study

Publish Year: 1397
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: English
View: 413

This Paper With 6 Page And PDF Format Ready To Download

  • Certificate
  • من نویسنده این مقاله هستم

این Paper در بخشهای موضوعی زیر دسته بندی شده است:

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این Paper:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_IRJNM-26-2_002

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 19 بهمن 1398

Abstract:

Introduction: Use of SPECT/CT data is the most accurate method for patient-specific internal dosimetry when isotopes emit single gamma rays. The manual or semi-automatic segmentation of organs is a major obstacle that slows down and limits the patient-specific dosimetry. Using digital phantoms that mimic patient’s anatomy can bypass the segmentation step and facilitate the dosimetry process. In this study, the results of a patient-specific dosimetry based on CT data and XCAT phantom, a flexible phantom with predefined organs, are compared. Methods: The dosimetry results (S-value and SAF) were calculated for a patient with breast cancer who received Samarium-153 ethylenediamine-N,N,N′,N′-tetrakis(methylenephosphonic acid (153Sm-EDTMP). Biodistribution of activity was obtained from the SPECT scan. The anatomical data and attenuation map were extracted from CT as well as the XCAT phantom with different BMIs. GATE Monte-Carlo simulator was used to calculate the dose to different organs based on the activity distribution and segmented anatomy. Results:The whole body dosimetry results are the same for both calculations based on the CT and XCAT with different BMIs; however for target organs, the differences between SAFs and S-values are high. In the spine, the clinically important target organ for Samarium therapy, the dosimetry results obtained from phantoms with unmatched BMIs between XCAT phantom and CT are substantially different. Conclusion: We showed that atlas-based dosimetry using XCAT phantom even with matched BMI may lead to considerable errors as compared to calculations based on patient’s own CT. For accurate dosimetry results, calculations should be done using CT data.

Authors

Maryam Fallahpoor

Department of Nuclear Medicine, Vali-Asr Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Mehrshad Abbasi

Department of Nuclear Medicine, Vali-Asr Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Ali Parach

Department of Medical Physics, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran

Ahmad Bitarafan Rajabi

Echocardiography Research Center, Cardiovascular Interventional Research Center, Rajaie Cardiovascular Medical and Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran|Department of Nuclear Medicine, Rajaie Cardiovascular Medical

مراجع و منابع این Paper:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این Paper را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود Paper لینک شده اند :
  • Grimes J, Celler A, Birkenfeld B, Shcherbinin S, Listewnik MH, ...
  • Kolbert KS, Sgouros G, Scott AM, Bronstein JE, Malane RA, ...
  • Saeedzadeh E, Sarkar S, Abbaspour Tehrani-Fard A, Ay MR, Khosravi ...
  • Sgouros G, Kolbert KS, Sheikh A, Pentlow KS, Mun EF, ...
  • Tsougos I, Loudos G, Georgoulias P, Theodorou K, Kappas C. ...
  • Dewaraja YK, Frey EC, Sgouros G, Brill AB, Roberson P, ...
  • Buck AK, Nekolla S, Ziegler S, Beer A, Krause BJ, ...
  • Dewaraja YK, Wilderman SJ, Koral KF, Kaminski MS, Avram AM. ...
  • Segars WP, Sturgeon G, Mendonca S, Grimes J, Tsui BMW. ...
  • Bauman G, Charette M, Reid R, Sathya J. Radiopharmaceuticals for ...
  • Jan S, Santin G, Strul D, Staelens S, Assié K, ...
  • Strulab D, Santin G, Lazaro D, Breton V, Morel C. ...
  • Jan S, Benoit D, Becheva E, Carlier T, Cassol F, ...
  • Taschereau R, Chow PL, Cho JS, Chatziioannou AF. A microCT ...
  • Parach AA, Rajabi H. A comparison between GATE4 results and ...
  • Visvikis D, Bardies M, Chiavassa S, Danford C, Kirov A, ...
  • Agostinelli S, Allison J, Amako K, Apostolakis J, Araujo H, ...
  • Song Y, Luboz V, Din N, King D, Gould D, ...
  • Fallahpoor M, Abbasi M, Sen A, Parach A, Kalantari F. ...
  • Parach AA, Rajabi H, Askari MA. Paired organs-should they be ...
  • Loevinger R, Budinger TF, Watson EE. MIRD primer for absorbed ...
  • Bolch WE, Eckerman KF, Sgouros G, Thomas SR. MIRD pamphlet ...
  • American Association of Physicists in Medicine. Physical aspects of quality ...
  • O Donoghue JA, Bardiès M, Wheldon TE. Relationships between tumor ...
  • Sarrut D, Bardiès M, Boussion N, Freud N, Jan S, ...
  • Díaz-Londoño G, García-Pareja S, Salvat F, Lallena AM. Monte Carlo ...
  • Fallahpoor M, Abbasi M, Kalantari F, Parach AA, Sen A. ...
  • Fallahpoor M, Abbasi M, Parach AA, Kalantari F. Internal dosimetry ...
  • Fallahpoor M, Abbasi M, Parach AA, Kalantari F. The importance ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع