ناشر تخصصی کنفرانس های ایران

لطفا کمی صبر نمایید

Publisher of Iranian Journals and Conference Proceedings

Please waite ..
Publisher of Iranian Journals and Conference Proceedings
Login |Register |Help |عضویت کتابخانه ها
Paper
Title

The influence of using different reconstruction algorithms on sensitivity of quantitative 18F-FDG-PET volumetric measures to background activity variation

Year: 1397
COI: JR_IRJNM-26-2_004
Language: EnglishView: 162
This Paper With 11 Page And PDF Format Ready To Download

Buy and Download

با استفاده از پرداخت اینترنتی بسیار سریع و ساده می توانید اصل این Paper را که دارای 11 صفحه است به صورت فایل PDF در اختیار داشته باشید.
آدرس ایمیل خود را در کادر زیر وارد نمایید:

Authors

Ali Ketabi - Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran|Research Center for Molecular and Cellular Imaging, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Pardis Ghafarian - Chronic Respiratory Diseases Research Center, National Research Institute of Tuberculosis and Lung Diseases, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran|PET/CT and Cyclotron Center, Masih Daneshvari Hospital, Shahid Beheshti
Mohammad Amin Mosleh-Shirazi - Medical Imaging Research Center and Physics Unit, Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Namazi Hospital, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
Seyed Rabi Mahdavi - Department of Medical Physics, Faculty of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Abstract:

Introduction: This study aims to investigate the influence of background activity variation on image quantification in differently reconstructed PET/CT images. Methods: Measurements were performed on a Discovery-690 PET/CT scanner using a custom-built NEMA-like phantom. A background activity level of 5.3 and 2.6 kBq/ml 18F-FDG were applied. Images were reconstructed employing four different reconstruction algorithms: HD (OSEM with no PSF or TOF), PSF only, TOF only, and TOFPSF, with Gaussian filters of 3 and 6.4 mm in FWHM. SUVmax and SUVpeak were obtained and used as cut-off thresholding; Metabolic Tumor Volume (MTV) and Total Lesion Glycolysis (TLG) were measured. The volume recovery coefficients (VRCs), the relative percent error (ΔMTV), and Dice similarity coefficient were assessed with respect to true values. Results:SUVmax and SUVpeak decreased and MTV increased as function of increasing the background dose. The most differences occur in smaller volumes with 3-mm filter; Non-TOF and Non-PSF reconstruction methods were more sensitive to increasing the background activity in the smaller and larger volumes, respectively. The TLG values were affected in the small lesions (decrease up to 12%). In a range of target volumes, differences between the mean ΔMTV in the high and low background dose varied from -11.8% to 7.2% using SUVmax and from 2.1% to 7.6% using SUVpeak inter reconstruction methods. Conclusion: The effect of the background activity variation on SUV-based quantification in small lesion was more noticeable than large lesion. The HD and TOFPSF algorithms had the lowest and the highest sensitivity to background activity, respectively.

Keywords:

Paper COI Code

This Paper COI Code is JR_IRJNM-26-2_004. Also You can use the following address to link to this article. This link is permanent and is used as an article registration confirmation in the Civilica reference:

https://civilica.com/doc/985374/

How to Cite to This Paper:

If you want to refer to this Paper in your research work, you can simply use the following phrase in the resources section:
Ketabi, Ali and Ghafarian, Pardis and Mosleh-Shirazi, Mohammad Amin and Mahdavi, Seyed Rabi,1397,The influence of using different reconstruction algorithms on sensitivity of quantitative 18F-FDG-PET volumetric measures to background activity variation,https://civilica.com/doc/985374

مراجع و منابع این Paper:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این Paper را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود Paper لینک شده اند :

  • Wahl RL, Jacene H, Kasamon Y, Lodge MA. From RECIST ...
  • Thorwarth D, Geets X, Paiusco M. Physical radiotherapy treatment planning ...
  • Tofilon PJ, Camphausen K. Increasing the therapeutic ratio of radiotherapy: ...
  • Lucignani G. SUV and segmentation: pressing challenges in tumour assessment ...
  • Oh JR, Seo JH, Chong A, Min JJ, Song HC, ...
  • Lee JW, Kang CM, Choi HJ, Lee WJ, Song SY, ...
  • Sheikhbahaei S, Marcus C, Subramaniam RM. 18F FDG PET/CT and ...
  • Manca G, Vanzi E, Rubello D, Giammarile F, Grassetto G, ...
  • Larson SM, Erdi Y, Akhurst T, Mazumdar M, Macapinlac HA, ...
  • d Amico A. Review of clinical practice utility of positron ...
  • Mac Manus MP, Everitt S, Bayne M, Ball D, Plumridge ...
  • Pan T, Mawlawi O. PET/CT in radiation oncology. Med Phys. ...
  • Shi X, Meng X, Sun X, Xing L, Yu J. ...
  • Grégoire V, Langendijk JA, Nuyts S. Advances in Radiotherapy for ...
  • Ling CC, Humm J, Larson S, Amols H, Fuks Z, ...
  • Bentzen SM. Theragnostic imaging for radiation oncology: dose-painting by numbers. ...
  • Lu W, Wang J, Zhang HH. Computerized PET/CT image analysis ...
  • Peeken JC, Nüsslin F, Combs SE. Radio-oncomics : The potential ...
  • Zhang H, Tan S, Chen W, Kligerman S, Kim G, ...
  • Doot RK, McDonald ES, Mankoff DA. Role of PET quantitation ...
  • Xu W, Yu S, Ma Y, Liu C, Xin J. ...
  • Berthon B, Evans M, Marshall C, Palaniappan N, Cole N, ...
  • Sridhar P, Mercier G, Tan J, Truong MT, Daly B, ...
  • Zaidi H, El Naqa I. PET-guided delineation of radiation therapy ...
  • Rogasch JM, Hofheinz F, Lougovski A, Furth C, Ruf J, ...
  • Brendle C, Kupferschläger J, Nikolaou K, la Fougère C, Gatidis ...
  • Knudtsen IS, van Elmpt W, Ollers M, Malinen E. Impact ...
  • Soret M, Bacharach SL, Buvat I. Partial-volume effect in PET ...
  • Chen GH, Yao ZF, Fan XW, Zhang YJ, Gao HQ, ...
  • Foster B, Bagci U, Mansoor A, Xu Z, Mollura DJ1. ...
  • Andersen FL, Klausen TL, Loft A, Beyer T, Holm S. ...
  • Prieto E, Domínguez-Prado I, García-Velloso MJ, Peñuelas I, Richter JÁ, ...
  • Sheikhbahaei S, Marcus C, Wray R, Rahmim A, Lodge MA, ...
  • Lee NY, Riaz N, Lu JJ. Target volume delineation for ...
  • Hanna GG, Hounsell AR, O Sullivan JM. Geometrical analysis of ...
  • Boellaard R, Delgado-Bolton R, Oyen WJ, Giammarile F, Tatsch K, ...
  • Zou KH, Warfield SK, Bharatha A, Tempany CMC, Kaus MR, ...
  • Sadick M, Molina F, Frey S, Piniol R, Sadick H, ...
  • Schaefer A, Kremp S, Hellwig D, Rübe C, Kirsch CM, ...
  • Burger IA, Vargas HA, Beattie BJ, Goldman DA, Zheng J, ...
  • Burger IA, Casanova R, Steiger S, Husmann L, Stolzmann P, ...
  • Research Info Management

    Certificate | Report | من نویسنده این مقاله هستم

    اطلاعات استنادی این Paper را به نرم افزارهای مدیریت اطلاعات علمی و استنادی ارسال نمایید و در تحقیقات خود از آن استفاده نمایید.

    Scientometrics

    The specifications of the publisher center of this Paper are as follows:
    Type of center: علوم پزشکی
    Paper count: 8,103
    In the scientometrics section of CIVILICA, you can see the scientific ranking of the Iranian academic and research centers based on the statistics of indexed articles.

    Share this page

    More information about COI

    COI stands for "CIVILICA Object Identifier". COI is the unique code assigned to articles of Iranian conferences and journals when indexing on the CIVILICA citation database.

    The COI is the national code of documents indexed in CIVILICA and is a unique and permanent code. it can always be cited and tracked and assumed as registration confirmation ID.

    Support