Mansour Rahmati-Balaghaleh - Department of Parasitology and Mycology, School of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
Hadi Mirahmadi - Infectious Diseases and Tropical Medicine Research Center, Resistant Tuberculosis Institute, Zahedan University of Medical Sciences, Zahedan, Iran
Soodabeh Etemadi - Department of Parasitology and Mycology, Faculty of Medicine, Zahedan University of Medical Sciences, Zahedan, Iran
Mehdi Zarean - Cutaneous Leishmaniasis Research Center, Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
Monavar Afzalaghaee - Management & Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
Seyed Aliakbar Shamsian - Department of Parasitology and Mycology, School of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran

Introduction and objects: malaria is highly endemic in south-east parts of Iran and the prompt assessment of the malaria cases is dependent on the sensitive and specific malaria identification. The aim of our study is to assess the efficacy and agreement of Light microscopy (LM) and Rapid diagnostic test (PfHRP-2/pLDH RDT) against Nested-PCR. Materials and Method: In a cross-sectional study, we assessed all malaria suspects that referred to Razi hospital in Saravan city, Sistan and Baluchestan, Iran. The patients’ demographics, microscopy data, RDT, and Nested-PCR results were gathered. The Nested-PCR results were set as reference and the other methods were compared against it. All the results were entered in SPSS version 16 and analyzed. Results: the sensitivity (Sn), specificity (Sp), positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and Kc were 55.3%, 100%, 100%, 94.3%, and 0.671 for LM and 55.3%, 99.6%, 95.4%, 94.3%, and 0.602, for RDT, respectively. Sn, Sp, PPV, NPV, and Kc of LM were 55.7%, 100%, 100%, 96.2%, and 0.714 for p. vivax and 25%, 100%, 100%, 97.9%, and 0.393 for plasmodium falciparum, respectively. Furthermore, the Sn, Sp, PPV, NPV, and Kc of RDT were 57.7%, 99.6%, 93.7%, 96.2%, and 0.695 for p. vivax and 25%, 99.6%, 66.7%, 97.9%, and 0.354 for p. falciparum. Conclusion: both methods were sensitive, specific, and had good agreement in detecting malaria and specifying p. vivax specie; however, their agreement was low in case of p. falciparum compared to Nested-PCR.

Malaria, Nested-PCR, RDT, Light Microscopy, Iran