Why is psychogenic nonepileptic seizure diagnosis missed A retrospective study

Publish Year: 1398
نوع سند: مقاله کنفرانسی
زبان: English
View: 341

نسخه کامل این Paper ارائه نشده است و در دسترس نمی باشد

  • Certificate
  • من نویسنده این مقاله هستم

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این Paper:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

EPILEPSEMED16_024

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 28 بهمن 1398

Abstract:

Purpose: The aim of this retrospective study was to scrutinize factors that are associated with a delay in making the diagnosis of psychogenic nonepileptic seizures (PNES).Methods: In this study, patients with PNES, who were investigated at Shiraz Comprehensive Epilepsy Center, Iran, from 2008 to 2019, were studied. We categorized the patients into the following: 1. those with a definite diagnosis of PNES in less than a year since the onset of their attacks; 2. those with a definite diagnosis of PNES later than 10 years since the onset of their attacks. Results: During the study period, 330 patients were recorded. In 98 patients (30%), the diagnosis of PNES was made in less than a year since their seizure onset. In 67 patients (20%), the diagnosis of PNES was made later than 10 years since their seizure onset. Taking antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) (odds ratio (OR) = 6) and a history of ictal injury (OR = 3.6) had a positive association, and age at the onset (OR = 0.8) had an inverse association with a delay in receiving a definite diagnosis of PNES (p = 0.0001). Conclusion: Some demographic variables (i.e., early age at the onset of seizures), patients clinical variables (i.e., severe seizure manifestations such as ictal injury), and finally, some physician-related variables (i.e., prescribing AEDs) have significant associations with a delay in making a definite diagnosis of PNES.

Authors

Z Bahrami

Shiraz University of Medical Sciences

M Homayoun

Shiraz University of Medical Sciences

AA Asadi-Pooya

Shiraz University of Medical Sciences