انواع و کارکرد دشواژه در سینمای معاصر ایران
Publish place: Journal of Language Horizons، Vol: 3، Issue: 2
Publish Year: 1399
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: English
View: 607
This Paper With 15 Page And PDF Format Ready To Download
- Certificate
- من نویسنده این مقاله هستم
استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:
شناسه ملی سند علمی:
JR_LGHOR-3-2_012
تاریخ نمایه سازی: 26 خرداد 1399
Abstract:
The present study explored the linguistic taboos in the Iranian cinema. Twenty Iranian movies in a period of twenty years—1998 to 2018—comprised the main corpus of this study. The descriptive method was used in this sociolinguistic study to describe the conditions in the Iranian movies. To answer the research questions and analyze the data obtained on the types of taboo words, the framework provided by Andersson and Trudgill (1990) was first modified slightly and then applied to this research. All the three types of categories presented by Andersson and Trudgill, i.e., sex and bodily functions, sanctity, and animals with the absence of sex type were used in this research. Besides, the traces of five other types of death, morality, physical/mental problems, relatives, and unpleasant concepts were also found in the Iranian cinema. Moreover, in order to study the functions of the taboo words, a revised classification developed by Wardhaugh (2006) was utilized. Based on thei findings, among the components of Wardhaugh’s classification, attention and provocation were observed in the Iranian cinema as well. A total number of 1262 taboos were detected in the data collected for this research. According to the findings, unpleasant concepts with the frequency of 49.45% proved to be the most commonly uttered type of taboo terms. Regarding the function of taboos, providing catharsis, with a frequency of 48.73%, was placed in the first rank. The findings lent us a helping hand in better understanding the spoken aspects in the informal usage of Persian; they also revealed the explicit and implicit reflections of emotions indialogical contexts.
Keywords:
Authors
Narges Rahmani
PhD candidate, Department of Linguistics, Faculty of Education and Psychology, Islamic Azad University, Zanjan branch, Zanjan, Iran
Behzad Rahbar
Assistant professor, Department of Linguistics, Faculty of Persian Literature and Foreign Languages, Allameh Tabataba i University, Tehran, Iran
Mohammad Reza Oroji
Assistant professor, Department of Linguistics, Faculty of Education and Psychology, Islamic Azad University, Zanjan branch, Zanjan, Iran
مراجع و منابع این Paper:
لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این Paper را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود Paper لینک شده اند :