Failure Mode and Effects Analysis and Risk Priority Number in a Combined Cycle Power Plant

Publish Year: 1399
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: English
View: 329

This Paper With 9 Page And PDF Format Ready To Download

  • Certificate
  • من نویسنده این مقاله هستم

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این Paper:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_AOH-5-1_007

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 2 اسفند 1399

Abstract:

Background: Work-related accidents are one of the most important factors in the loss of human lives. With technology and industrial progress, the consequences of accidents due to hazards become more severe and may even stop the work of power plants. This study aimed to identify and assess the risk of hazards in a combined cycle power plant. Methods: The descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted to assess the risk of a combined cycle power plant using the FMEA method. Having studied various documentation and records, holding different meetings, and brainstorming, the risk priority number was calculated and corrective suggestions have been presented. Results: Out of a total of 74 identified risks, 34 (45.94%) were at high risk, and 40 (54.05%) were of medium risk. 85% of the risks had the highest severity levels that could cause explosions and fires, injuries, and burns. Conclusion: It can be mentioned that the risks associated with industries such as power plants were high and preventive measures in such places are very important. Identifying hazards and risk assessments with a standard method such as FMEA was a useful way to prevent accidents and human and financial losses.  

Keywords:

Risk assessment , FMEA , Combined cycle power plant , Fire and Explosion

Authors

Elnaz Rahimi

Department of Occupational Health Engineering, School of Health, Ardabil University of Medical Sciences, Ardabil, Iran

Fateme Nakhjavani

Department of Occupational Health Engineering, School of Health, Ardabil University of Medical Sciences, Ardabil, Iran

Sara Safari

Department of Occupational Health Engineering, School of Health, Ardabil University of Medical Sciences, Ardabil, Iran

Hanieh Nematollahi

Department of Occupational Health Engineering, School of Health, Ardabil University of Medical Sciences, Ardabil, Iran

Samira Mardaneh

Department of Occupational Health Engineering, School of Health, Ardabil University of Medical Sciences, Ardabil, Iran

Amin Babaei Pouya

Department of Occupational Health Engineering, School of Health, Ardabil University of Medical Sciences, Ardabil, Iran

مراجع و منابع این Paper:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این Paper را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود Paper لینک شده اند :
  • 1. Dastjerdi E, Mohammadfam I. Comparing the two methods tree ...
  • 2. Wadsworth EJK, Simpson SA, Moss SC, Smith AP. The ...
  • 3. Kolahdouzi M, Halvani GH, Nazaripour Abdehgah E, Ghaljahi M, ...
  • 4. ERGöR OA, Demiral Y, Piyal YB. A significant outcome ...
  • 5. Flin R, Mearns K, O'Connor P, Bryden R. Measuring ...
  • 6. Mohammad Fam I, Kianfar A, Faridan M. Application of ...
  • 7. Kim Y, Park J, Park M. Creating a culture ...
  • 8. Atombo C, Wu C, Tettehfio EO, Nyamuame GY, Agbo ...
  • 9. Ahmadi P, Dincer I, Rosen MA. Exergy, exergoeconomic and ...
  • 10. Soltani S, Mahmoudi SMS, Yari M, Morosuk T, Rosen ...
  • 11. Modiri M, Dashti Shiramin M, Karimi Shirazi H. Identification ...
  • 12. Pang R, Smith RW. Combined cycle power plant: Google ...
  • 13. Manente G. High performance integrated solar combined cycles with ...
  • 14. Cline PB. The Merging of Risk Analysis and Adventure ...
  • 15. Shirali GA, Askaripoor T, Kazemi E, Zohoorian Azad E, ...
  • 16. Henley EJ, Kumamoto H. Probabilistic risk assessment and management ...
  • 17. James E. Risk analysis: Two tools you can use ...
  • 18. Ahlert RC. Guidelines for consequence analysis of chemical releases. ...
  • 19. Onodera K. Effective techniques of FMEA at each life-cycle ...
  • 20. Dong YL, Gu YJ, Dong XF. Selection of optimum ...
  • 21. Jozi SA, Pouriyeh AA. Health-safety and environmental risk assessment ...
  • 22. Ravi Sankar N, Prabhu BS. Modified approach for prioritization ...
  • 23. Sawhney R, Subburaman K, Sonntag C, Rao Venkateswara Rao ...
  • 24. Khazami M. Environmental Risk Assessment Ahvaz No. 1 Desalting ...
  • 25. Mirmohammadi ST, NaseriPouya Z, Hosseinalipour Z. Risk factors assessment ...
  • 26. Dağsuyu C, Göçmen E, Narlı M, Kokangül A. Classical ...
  • 27. Leroi E, Bonnard Ch, Fell R, McInnes R. Risk ...
  • 28. Askaripoor T, Kazemi E, Aghaei H, Marzban M. Evaluating ...
  • 29. Jozi SA, Saffarian SH. Environmental risk analysis of Abadan ...
  • 30. Shahedi Aliabadi S, Assari MJ, Kalatpour O, Zarei E, ...
  • 31. Ebrahim Fathabadi H. Take engineering to human error in ...
  • 32. Jozi A, Farbod S, Arjmandi R, Nouri J. Utility ...
  • 33. Hamidan N, Dashti S. Risk Assessment of Oil Reservoirs ...
  • 34. Chatzimouratidis AI, Pilavachi PA. Multicriteria evaluation of power plants ...
  • 35. Marzban M. Hydraulic modeling the fire network of a ...
  • 36. Arabian-Hoseynabadi H, Oraee H, Tavner PJ. Failure modes and ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع