Ergonomic Evaluation of Risk Factors for Musculoskeletal Disorders in Construction Workers by Key Indicator Method (KIM)

Publish Year: 1397
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: English
View: 217

This Paper With 7 Page And PDF Format Ready To Download

  • Certificate
  • من نویسنده این مقاله هستم

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این Paper:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_AOH-2-4_004

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 2 اسفند 1399

Abstract:

Background: Construction activities are dicey businesses such that the existing peril not only threatens the personchr('39')s safety, but also has health impacts. Inappropriate work postures, vibration and prolonged standing from using physical workload resources are known to cause musculoskeletal disorders among construction workers. Consequently, the purpose of this study was to evaluate the physical posture of construction workers using key indicator method. Methods: In this descriptive-analytical study, 150 construction workers were assessed in Bojnourd city. They included reinforcement workers, plasterers, tile installers, stoneworkers and painters. Thirty individuals from each of these professions were evaluated. This study was conducted using simple randomized sampling and in-person sessions. The prevalence of musculoskeletal discomfort was evaluated using Nordic questionnaire while working postures was assessed using KIM. Data was analyzed by chi-square. with SPSS19 software (P-Value =0.05).Results: The mean age of the workers was 29.28 (6.329), the average working experience was 4.91 ( 5.574) years and the mean duration of work was 6.34 (1.16). The Min and Max scores for workerschr('39') postural work were 18 and 64, respectively; and the average final score was 40.59 (11.941). There was no significant difference in terms of the relationship between the final score with age and work experience. However, a significant difference was observed in relation to the duration of the work and the type of task. The average final score for the reinforcement workers, stone workers, plasterer, painter and tile installer was 50.67 (8.227), 47.6(6.29), 45 (6.052), 5.188 (38), and 21.7 (3.12), respectively. Conclusion: Musculoskeletal disorders are frequent in construction workers. Consequently, appropriate measures should be taken to reduce musculoskeletal disorders among construction workers. These measures include provision of ergonomic guidelines in the design of work stations, tools and training of workers in the field on correct lifting techniques.

Authors

Rajabali Hokmabadi

MSc, Department of Occupational Health Engineering, Health School, North Khorasan University of Medical Sciences, Bojnurd, Iran

Hossein Fallah

PhD Student of Ergonomics, Department of Occupational Health and Ergonomics, Faculty of Health, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran

Morteza Esmailzadeh

MSc, Department of Occupational Health Engineering, Health School, North Khorasan University of Medical Sciences, Bojnurd, Iran

مراجع و منابع این Paper:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این Paper را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود Paper لینک شده اند :
  • 1. Manchikanti L. Epidemiology of low back pain. Pain Physician. ...
  • 2. David G, Woods V, Li G, Buckle P. ...
  • for work-related musculoskeletal disorders. Applied ergonomics. 2008;39(1):57-69. ...
  • 3. Chubineh AR. Posture assessment methods in occupational ergonomics. Hamadan: ...
  • 4.Darragh AR, Huddleston W, King P. Work-related musculoskeletal injuries and ...
  • 5. World Health Organization. WHO global plan of action on ...
  • 6. Hokmabadi R. Fallah H. Ergonomic assessment of musculoskeletal disorders ...
  • 7. Sadeghi F, Asilian H, Barati L. Evaluation of the ...
  • 8. Nasl saraji J, Ghafari sotobadi M, ShahtaheriSJ. Survey of ...
  • 9. Kai Way L, Cheng-Lung L. Postural analysis offour jobs ...
  • 10. Plamondon A, Larivière C, Delisle A, Denis D, Gagnon ...
  • 11. Randelin M, Saaranen T, Naumanen P, LouhevaaraV. Towards sustainable ...
  • 12. Steinberg U. New tools in Germany: development and appliance ...
  • 13- Hesam GH. Motamedzade M. Khakbaz GH. Moradpoor Z. Ergonomics ...
  • 14- Eskandari D, Norizade N, Sasadati H, Mohammadpour S, Gholami ...
  • 15- Nasl Seraji J. HajaghazadeM, Hosseini M, Adl J. Ergonomic ...
  • 16- Buchholz B, Paquet V, Wellman H, Forde M. Quantifications ...
  • 17- Hajaghazade M, Nasl seraj J, Hossini M, Adel J. ...
  • 18- Fulmer S, Jenkins P, Mason C, Bresee C, May ...
  • 19- Pirmand R, Heidari A, Hashemi poor M, Talebi M, ...
  • 20- Memarian B, Mitropoulos P. Safety incidents and high-risk activities ...
  • 21- Ouma PO. The Relationship between Manual Handling Skills and ...
  • Study of Nairobi. Master of Arts in construction management. Available ...
  • 22- Rahman MNA, Rani MRA, Rohani JM, editors. Investigation of ...
  • 23-Piligian G, Herbert R, Hearns M, Dropkin J, Landsbergis P, ...
  • 24-Foruresh E, Mazloumi A, HabibiMohrez M, TaghaviShahri M, Souri S, ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع