The Effect of Blended Online Automated Feedback and Teacher Feedback on EFL Learners’ Essay Writing Ability and Perception

Publish Year: 1399
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: English
View: 194

This Paper With 45 Page And PDF Format Ready To Download

  • Certificate
  • من نویسنده این مقاله هستم

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این Paper:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_JTLS-39-31_006

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 6 اردیبهشت 1400

Abstract:

Applying both teacher- and computer-generated feedback to foster EFL learners’ writing remains a less explored issue. The purpose of this study was two-fold. Firstly, it examined whether blending both online automated feedback (OAF) and teacher feedback had a significant effect on EFL learners’ writing ability or not. Secondly, it explored their perceptions on the use of the blended OAF and teacher feedback. To this end,this study employed a mixed-method design using essay writing, questionnaire, and interview to investigate the impact of blended OAF and teacher feedback on EFL learners’ writing ability in an essay writing course. Thirty intermediate EFL learners participated in the study; they were given the first writing pre-test, and then were assigned into experimental and control groups randomly. The experimental group was given access to the integrated OAF and teacher feedback on their two-paragraph problem-solution essay writing during the treatment phase while the control group received teacher-only feedback. The results of the independent samples t-test and RM ANOVA showed that the experimental group outperformed the control group in terms of the overall score for the two final essay writings, and also demonstrated a significant improvement in writing scores across four essays during the treatment. The qualitative data also revealed the participants’ positive perception towards the effectiveness of the blended OAF and teacher feedback on their writing. Overall, the findings of this study can contribute to a better understanding of the impact of the blended feedback in enhancing EFL learners’ writing ability.

Keywords:

Authors

Masumeh Salavatizadeh

Department of English Language and Literature, Faculty of Humanities, University of Guilan, Rasht, Iran

Abdorreza Tahriri

Department of English Language and Literature, Faculty of Humanities, University of Guilan, Rasht, Iran

مراجع و منابع این Paper:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این Paper را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود Paper لینک شده اند :
  • Attali, Y., & Burstein, J. (2006). Automated essay scoring with ...
  • Burstein, J., Chodorow, M., & Leacock, C. (2004). Automated essay ...
  • Burstein, J., & Marcu, D. (2003). Automated evaluation of discourse ...
  • Chandler, J. (2003). The efficacy of various kinds of error ...
  • Chapelle, C. A. (2001). Computer applications in second language acquisition. ...
  • Chen, C.-F. E., & Cheng, W.-Y. E. C. (2008). Beyond ...
  • Cheng, G. (2017). The impact of online automated feedback on ...
  • Clark, L. A., & Watson, D. (1995). Constructing validity: Basic ...
  • Conrad, S. M., & Goldstein, L. M. (1999). ESL student ...
  • Cunningham, K. J. (2018). Modes of feedback in ESL writing: ...
  • Deane, P. (2013). On the relation between automated essay scoring ...
  • Delice, A. (2010). The sampling issues in quantitative research. Educational ...
  • Dikli, S., & Bleyle, S. (2014). Automated essay scoring feedback ...
  • Doughty, C., & Williams, J. (1998). Focus on form in ...
  • Ellis, R. (2008). A typology of written corrective feedback types. ...
  • Ene, E., & Upton, T. A. (2014). Learner uptake of ...
  • Ericsson, P. F., & Haswell, R. H. (2006). Machine scoring ...
  • Ferris, D., & Roberts, B. (2001). Error feedback in L2 ...
  • Ferris, D. R. (1995). Student reactions to teacher response in ...
  • Ferris, D. R. (1997). The influence of teacher commentary on ...
  • Fotoohnejad, S. (2018). Using an automated writing evaluation program (Criterion) ...
  • Grimes, D., & Warschauer, M. (2010). Utility in a fallible ...
  • Hamp-Lyons, L. (2002). The scope of writing assessment. Assessing Writing, ...
  • Hearst, M. A. (2000). The debate on automated essay grading. ...
  • Hoon, T. B. (2006). Online automated essay assessment: Potentials for ...
  • Huang, S.-J. (2014). Automated versus human scoring: A case study ...
  • Hyland, F. (1998). The impact of teacher written feedback on ...
  • Hyland, K., & Hyland, F. (2006). Feedback on second language ...
  • Kellogg, R. T., Whiteford, A. P., & Quinlan, T. (2010). ...
  • Keshavarz, M. H. (2017). Contrastive analysis, error analysis, and interlanguage ...
  • Kim, J. E. (2014). The effectiveness of automated essay scoring ...
  • Klobucar, A., Elliot, N., Deess, P., Rudniy, O., & Joshi, ...
  • Krishnamurthy, S. (2005). A demonstration of the futility of using ...
  • Lai, Y. h. (2010). Which do students prefer to evaluate ...
  • Li, J., Link, S., & Hegelheimer, V. (2015). Rethinking the ...
  • Li, Z., Link, S., Ma, H., Yang, H., & Hegelheimer, ...
  • Liao, H.-C. (2016). Enhancing the grammatical accuracy of EFL writing ...
  • Mackey, A., & Gass, S. M. (2016). Second language research: ...
  • Richards, J. C., & Schmidt, R. (2010). Longman dictionary of ...
  • Robinson, P. (2001). Cognition and second language instruction. Cambridge: Cambridge ...
  • Stevenson, M., & Phakiti, A. (2014). The effects of computer-generated ...
  • Wang, Y.-J., Shang, H.-F., & Briody, P. (2013). Exploring the ...
  • Whithaus, C. (2006). Always already: Automated essay scoring and grammar ...
  • Yancey, K. B. (1999). Looking back as we look forward: ...
  • Yeh, Y.-L., Liou, H.-C., & Yu, Y.-T. (2007). The influence ...
  • Zemach, D. E., & Rumisek, L. A. (2013). Academic Writing ...
  • Zheng, B., Warschauer, M., & Farkas, G. (2013). Digital writing ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع