The Effect of Preview, Question, Read, and Summarize (PQRS) Strategy ‎on Indonesian EFL Students’ Writing Ability across Working Memory ‎Capacity Levels

Publish Year: 1396
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: English
View: 119

This Paper With 20 Page And PDF Format Ready To Download

  • Certificate
  • من نویسنده این مقاله هستم

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این Paper:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_AREUIT-6-4_003

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 5 دی 1400

Abstract:

This study aimed at investigating the effect of Preview, Question, Read, Summarize (PQRS) Strategy on EFL students’ writing ability by considering their working memory capacity (WMC) levels. It involved Indonesian English as a foreign language (EFL) students of English Department in Universitas Negeri Malang, one of the leading universities in Indonesia. This study applied a quasi-experimental design and compared the writing ability of two intact groups of students. The data were collected by using writing tests and a WMC test. The results of the research revealed that there was a significant difference between the students who were taught by using the PQRS strategy and those who were not taught by using that strategy. However, there was no significant difference in the writing ability of the EFL students across WMC levels. Theoretically, this study supports the important roles of integrated reading-writing instruction in the teaching of writing. Pedagogically, in the teaching of writing, EFL teachers might apply the PQRS strategy as part of integrated reading-writing instruction to EFL students regardless of the difference in their WMC levels.

Authors

Vindy Ekaningrum

Universitas Negeri Malang, Malang, Indonesia

Bambang Cahyono

Universitas Negeri Malang, Malang, Indonesia

Enny Irawati

Universitas Negeri Malang, Malang Indonesia

مراجع و منابع این Paper:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این Paper را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود Paper لینک شده اند :
  • Abu-Akel, A. (۱۹۹۷). On reading-writing relationships in first and foreign ...
  • Baddeley, A. D. (۱۹۸۶). Working memory. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press ...
  • Badger, R., & White, G. (۲۰۰۰). A process genre approach ...
  • Bergsleithner, J. M. (۲۰۱۰). Working memory capacity and L۲ writing ...
  • Brown, H. D., & Abeywickrama, P. (۲۰۰۴). Language assessment: Principles ...
  • Brown, H. D., & Lee, H. (۲۰۱۵). Teaching by principles ...
  • Cahyono, B. Y. (۱۹۹۲). Development and application of content-based summarizing ...
  • Delaney, Y. A. (۲۰۰۸). Investigating the reading-to-write construct. Journal of ...
  • Fotkamp, M. B. M. (۱۹۹۹). Working memory capacity and L۲ ...
  • Jacobs, H. L, Zinkgraf, S. A., Wormuth, D. R., Hartfiel, ...
  • Jayanti, F., G. (۲۰۱۴). The effects of integrated reading-writing instruction ...
  • Kirin, W. (۲۰۱۰). Effects of extensive reading on students’ writing ...
  • Koons, H. H., (۲۰۰۸). The reading-writing connection: An investigation of ...
  • Lee, M. J. (۲۰۱۴). Relative contribution of working memory capacity ...
  • Prebianca, G. (۲۰۰۹). Working memory capacity, lexical access, and proficiency ...
  • Schnur, E. E., & Wright, J. S. (۲۰۱۳). Working Memory ...
  • Shanahan, T., & Lomax, R. G. (۱۹۸۸). A developmental comparison ...
  • Shen, M. Y. (۲۰۰۹). Reading-writing connection for EFL college learners’ ...
  • Tuan, L. T. (۲۰۱۲). Teaching writing through reading integration. Journal ...
  • Turner, M. L., & Engle, R. W. (۱۹۸۹). Is working ...
  • Weigle, S. C. (۲۰۰۲). Assessing writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press ...
  • Williams, M., & Burden, R. L. (۱۹۹۷). Psychology for language ...
  • Yi, B., & Ni, C. (۲۰۱۵). Planning and working memory ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع