Impacts of different pig slurry application methods on soil quality indicators in a maize-soybean cropping sequence in the Sub-humid Pampas of Argentina

Publish Year: 1399
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: English
View: 145

This Paper With 14 Page And PDF Format Ready To Download

  • Certificate
  • من نویسنده این مقاله هستم

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این Paper:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_ROWA-9-3_004

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 18 بهمن 1400

Abstract:

Purpose In Argentina, pig slurry (PS) is spread in surface with N losses in ammonia form. Different methods to decrease these emissions are available, but there is poor information about their impacts on the soil-plant system. The objective of this study was to compare the effects of different PS application methods on the soil quality in a maize-soybean cropping sequence. Methods PS application methods were evaluated: acidified (AS), incorporated (IS), surface (SS), mineral fertilization (MF) and control (C). The experimental design was arranged in a randomized block with three replicates. Chemical parameters and microbiological parameters were determined. Also, grain yields and N uptake were measured. Results IS caused increases in anaerobic nitrogen and basal respiration of soil on soybean. Treatments with PS and/or FM showed lower values in pH than C in both crops, and higher electrical conductivity only in maize. SS treatment showed higher Pe on soybean, indicating a maintenance of the P levels with respect to those in MF and C. The concentration of NO۳- increased with MF in both crops. In maize, MF presented similar concentrations to AS and SS. IS increased grain yields of maize by ۱۶ %, whereas SS and AS increased yields of soybean by ۱۱۲% and ۷۹%, respectively, compared to C. Conclusions The different PS application methods had similar effects on most of the indicators of soil quality. In maize, IS and AS were more efficient in retaining N within the soil-plant system, whereas, in soybean, the SS led to higher yields.

Authors

- -

Área Suelos y Producción Vegetal, Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria, Ruta Nº ۱۲ km ۳, Marcos Juárez, Córdoba, Argentina

- -

Área Suelos y Producción Vegetal, Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria, Ruta Nº ۱۲ km ۳, Marcos Juárez, Córdoba, Argentina

- -

Cátedra de Edafología. Facultad de Ciencias Agropecuarias. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Ciudad de Córdoba, Argentina

- -

Área Suelos y Producción Vegetal, Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria, Ruta Nº ۱۲ km ۳, Marcos Juárez, Córdoba, Argentina

- -

Área Suelos y Producción Vegetal, Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria, Ruta Nº ۱۲ km ۳, Marcos Juárez, Córdoba, Argentina

- -

Área Suelos y Producción Vegetal, Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria, Ruta Nº ۱۲ km ۳, Marcos Juárez, Córdoba, Argentina

- -

Área Suelos y Producción Vegetal, Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria, Ruta Nº ۱۲ km ۳, Marcos Juárez, Córdoba, Argentina

- -

Cátedra de Edafología. Facultad de Ciencias Agropecuarias. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Ciudad de Córdoba, Argentina

- -

Cátedra de Fertilidad y Fertilizantes. Facultad de Agronomía. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Ciudad de Buenos Aires, Argentina

مراجع و منابع این Paper:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این Paper را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود Paper لینک شده اند :
  • Aita C, Giacomini SJ, Hübner AP (۲۰۰۷) Nitrificação do nitrogênio ...
  • IRAM-SAGPyA ۲۹۵۷۲ -۱ (۲۰۱۱) Determinación de nitrógeno en suelo por ...
  • Yanardağ IH, Zornoza R, Bastida F, Büyükkiliç-Yanardağ A, García C, ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع