Key Factors for Defining the Conceptual Framework for Quality Assurance in E-Learning

Publish Year: 1398
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: English
View: 97

This Paper With 13 Page And PDF Format Ready To Download

  • Certificate
  • من نویسنده این مقاله هستم

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این Paper:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_JITM-11-3_002

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 26 بهمن 1400

Abstract:

E-learning has evolved for more than a decade, and universities are gradually embracing e-learning to provide more learning experience for their learners. E-learning is the use of electronic means through which training is received and obtained. E-learning offers a wide range of advantages (time and room mobility, cost-effectiveness, etc.) and also overcomes the limitations of digital learning that have led to the widespread adoption of the institute. The poor quality of e-learning services is one of the main causes of the number of errors collected. Experts proposed performance models for e-learning systems, but most relied solely on pedagogical opinions. From a software perspective, very limited attention is paid to evaluating the performance of e-learning applications. It is therefore quite difficult to evaluate the overall performance of the e-learning scheme effectively. The aim of this study is to draw up separate stakeholders in the e-learning system by providing a roadmap to ensure the effectiveness of their e-learning facilities, particularly in emerging countries and Iraq. The higher education data system guarantees and measures the performance of its e-learning system in its own way, as there is no specific definition of the performance of the e-learning system. This work is expected to be ready to harmonize the various stakeholders to a satisfactory standard within the performance framework.

Authors

- -

Scholarships and Cultural Relations Directorate, Ministry of Higher Education and Scientific Research, Baghdad, Iraq.

- -

Computer Science Department, College of Pure Sciences of Education, University of Mosul, Mosul, Iraq.

- -

Assistant Professor, Computer center/University of Mosul, Mosul, Iraq.

مراجع و منابع این Paper:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این Paper را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود Paper لینک شده اند :
  • Ali, G. E., & Magalhaes, R. (۲۰۰۸). Barriers to implementing ...
  • Baker, W. M., Lusk, E. J., & Neuhauser, K. L. ...
  • Baruque, L. B., Baruque, C. B., & Melo, R. N. ...
  • Bhuasiri, W., Xaymoungkhoun, O., Zo, H., Rho, J. J., & ...
  • Borstorff, P. C., & Lowe, S. K. (۲۰۰۷). Student perceptions ...
  • Chawinga, W. D., & Zozie, P. A. (۲۰۱۶). Increasing access ...
  • Chen, S.-J. (۲۰۱۴). Instructional design strategies for intensive online courses: ...
  • Ćukušić, M., Alfirević, N., Granić, A., & Garača, Ž. (۲۰۱۰). ...
  • Dubey, S. K., Ghosh, S., & Rana, A. (۲۰۱۲). Comparison ...
  • Egbert, J. (۲۰۰۹). Supporting learning with technology: Essentials of classroom ...
  • Hatami, A. (۲۰۱۵). The effect of collaborative learning and self-assessment ...
  • Heidarian, N. (۲۰۱۶). Investigating the effect of using self-assessment on ...
  • Inglis, A. (۲۰۰۵). Quality improvement, quality assurance, and benchmarking: Comparing ...
  • Inglis, A. (۲۰۰۸). Approaches to the validation of quality frameworks ...
  • Islam, M. T., & Selim, A. S. M. (۲۰۰۶). Information ...
  • Kashorda, M., & Waema, T. (۲۰۱۴). E-readiness survey of kenyan ...
  • Khan, B. H. (۲۰۰۴). Comprehensive approach to program evaluation in ...
  • Khan, G. F., Moon, J., Rhee, C., & Rho, J. ...
  • Koohang, A., Riley, L., Smith, T., & Schreurs, J. (۲۰۰۹). ...
  • Kundi, G. M., Nawaz, A., & Khan, S. (۲۰۱۰). The ...
  • Makokha, G. L., & Mutisya, D. N. (۲۰۱۶). Status of ...
  • Mason, R., & Rennie, F. (۲۰۰۸). The e-Learning handbook: Designing ...
  • Masoumi, D. (۲۰۱۰). Quality in E-learning within a cultural context. ...
  • Masoumi, D., & Lindström, B. (۲۰۱۲). Quality in e‐learning: a ...
  • Matar, N., Hunaiti, Z., Halling, S., & Matar, Š. (۲۰۱۱). ...
  • Mayoka, K., & Kyeyune, R. (۲۰۱۲). An analysis of elearning ...
  • McKevitt, C. T. (۲۰۱۶). Engaging students with self-assessment and tutor ...
  • Mirza, A. A., & Al-Abdulkareem, M. (۲۰۱۱). Models of e-learning ...
  • Mtebe, J. S., & Raisamo, R. (۲۰۱۴). A Model for ...
  • Mutisya, D. N., & Makokha, G. L. (۲۰۱۶). Challenges affecting ...
  • Ozarslan, Y., & Ozan, O. (۲۰۱۶). Self‐Assessment Quiz Taking Behaviour ...
  • Ozkan, S., Koseler, R., & Baykal, N. (۲۰۰۹). Evaluating learning ...
  • Paulsen, M. F. (۲۰۰۳). Experiences with learning management systems in ...
  • Penna, M. P., & Stara, V. (۲۰۰۸). Approaches to e-learning ...
  • Peyton, C. (۲۰۱۷). Students’ Perception of the self-assessment process in ...
  • Raspopovic, M., Jankulovic, A., Runic, J., & Lucic, V. (۲۰۱۴). ...
  • Salmon, G. (۲۰۰۴). E-moderating: The key to teaching and learning ...
  • Sarikhani, R., Salari, M., & Mansouri, V. (۲۰۱۶). The impact ...
  • Sife, A. S., & Lwoga, E. T. (۲۰۱۴). Publication productivity ...
  • Simpson, O. (۲۰۱۶). Student support services for success in open ...
  • Ssekakubo, G., Suleman, H., & Marsden, G. (۲۰۱۱). Issues of ...
  • Tarus, J. K., Gichoya, D., & Muumbo, A. (۲۰۱۵). Challenges ...
  • Thomas, K. M., O’Bannon, B. W., & Bolton, N. (۲۰۱۳). ...
  • Wang, W.-T., & Wang, C.-C. (۲۰۰۹). An empirical study of ...
  • Weaver, D., Spratt, C., & Nair, C. S. (۲۰۰۸). Academic ...
  • Zhang, W., & Cheng, Y. L. (۲۰۱۲). Quality assurance in ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع