Suitable Mining Method Selection using HFGDM-TOPSIS Method: a Case Study of an Apatite Mine

Publish Year: 1401
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: English
View: 105

This Paper With 18 Page And PDF Format Ready To Download

  • Certificate
  • من نویسنده این مقاله هستم

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این Paper:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_JMAE-13-2_003

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 29 تیر 1401

Abstract:

Mining Method Selection (MMS) is the first and the most critical problem in mine design, and depends on some parameters such as the geo-technical and geological features and economic factors. The factors affecting MMS are determined by some mining experts, and the most suitable mining method is selected using the hesitant fuzzy group decision-making (HFGDM) and technique for order performance by similarity to the ideal solution (TOPSIS) method. These factors include the type of deposit, slope of deposit, thickness of orebody, depth below the surface, grade distribution, hanging wall Rock Mass Rating (RMR), footwall RMR, ore body RMR, recovery, capital cost, mining cost, annual productivity, and environmental impact. Firstly, we propose the group decision-making (GDM) method to determine the weights of multi-attributes based on the score function with the decision-makers’ weights, in which the n-dimensional hesitant fuzzy environment take the form of hesitant fuzzy sets (HFS). Then we calculate the weights of these factors using the HFGDM method. A simple case study is also presented in order to illustrate the competence of this method. Here, we compare the seven mining methods for an Apatite mine, and select the optimal mining method using the TOPSIS method. Finally, the sub-level stope mining method is selected as the most suitable method to this mine.

Keywords:

Mining Method Selection , Hesitant fuzzy group decision making (HFGDM) , TOPSIS , hesitant fuzzy sets (HFS)

Authors

Myong Chun Pak

Faculty of Mining Engineering, Kim Chaek University of Technology, Pyongyang, Democratic People’s Republic of Korea.

Un Chol Han

School of Science and Engineering, Kim Chaek University of Technology, Pyongyang, Democratic People’s Republic of Korea.

Dong Il Kim

Department of Applied Mathematics, Kim Chaek University of Technology, Pyongyang, Democratic People’s Republic of Korea

مراجع و منابع این Paper:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این Paper را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود Paper لینک شده اند :
  • Dehghani, H., Siami, A., and Haghi, P. (۲۰۱۷). A new ...
  • Saaty, T.L. (۱۹۹۰). The analytic hierarchy process. McGraw-Hill, New York ...
  • Alpay, S. and Yavuz, M. (۲۰۰۷). A decision support system ...
  • Ataei, M., Sereshki, F., Jamshidi, M., and Jalali, S.M.E. (۲۰۰۸). ...
  • Jamshidi, M., Ataei, M., Sereshki, F., and Jalali, S.M.E. (۲۰۰۹). ...
  • Bitarafan, M.R. and Ataei, M. (۲۰۰۴). Mining method selection by ...
  • Naghadehi, Z.M., Mikaeil, R., and Ataei, M. (۲۰۰۹). The Application ...
  • Namin, F.S., Shahriar, K., Ataee-pour, M., and Dehghani, H. (۲۰۰۸). ...
  • Namin, F. S., Shahriar, K., Bascetin, A., and Ghodsypour, S.H. ...
  • Bogdanovic, D., Nikolic, D., and Ilic, I. (۲۰۱۲). Mining method ...
  • Azadeh, A., Osanloo, M., and Ataei, M. (۲۰۱۰). A new ...
  • Ataei, M., Shahsavany, H., and Mikaeil, R. (۲۰۱۳). Monte Carlo ...
  • Gélvez, J.I.R., Aldana, F.A.C., and Sepúlveda, G. F. (۲۰۱۴). Mining ...
  • Karimnia, H. and Bagloo, H. (۲۰۱۵). Optimum mining method selection ...
  • Yavuz, M. (۲۰۱۵). The application of the analytic hierarchy process ...
  • Chen, J., Zou, Z., and Ren, C. (۲۰۱۵). Research on ...
  • Ataei, M., Sereshki, F., Jamshidi, M., and Jalali, S.M.E. (۲۰۰۸). ...
  • Nourali, H.R., Nourali, S., Ataei, M., and Imanipour, N. (۲۰۱۲). ...
  • Hu, J.H., Zhang, X.L., Chen, X. H., and Liu, Y.M. ...
  • Liu, X.D., Zhu, J.J. Zhang, S.T. Hao, J.J., and Liu, ...
  • Xu, Z.S. and Zhang, X.L. (۲۰۱۳). Hesitant fuzzy multi-attribute decision ...
  • Zhang, Z.M. (۲۰۱۷). Hesitant Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Group Decision Making with ...
  • Torra, V. (۲۰۱۰). Hesitant fuzzy sets. International Journal of Intelligent ...
  • Xia, M. and Xu, Z. (۲۰۱۱). Hesitant fuzzy information aggregation ...
  • Hwang, C.L. and Yoon, K.S. (۱۹۸۱). Multiple attribute decision making: ...
  • Zadeh, L.A. (۱۹۷۵). The concept of a linguistic variable and ...
  • Zadeh, L.A. (۱۹۷۵). The concept of a linguistic variable and ...
  • Uyun, S. and Riadi, I. (۲۰۱۱). A Fuzzy TOPSIS Multiple-Attribute ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع