Performance Comparison of Two Different Branded Blood Collection Tubes Used in Biochemistry Laboratory

Publish Year: 1401
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: English
View: 147

This Paper With 9 Page And PDF Format Ready To Download

  • Certificate
  • من نویسنده این مقاله هستم

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این Paper:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_JIML-9-3_005

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 2 اسفند 1401

Abstract:

Background and Aims: Blood collection tubes (BCT) with gel separators are diagnostic devices that can affect all laboratory processes. In this study, the aim was to compare the performance of a new brand of BCT with the sample tubes that are well-known and widely used in the market. Materials and Methods: Blood samples were taken from ۵۰ healthy volunteers to two brands of BCTs (KWS and BD Vacutainer SST II Advance) by providing standard conditions. The nine most requested test parameters were determined and analyzed simultaneously. The results were analyzed using the SPSS ۲۱ software. Results: There was no significant difference in the results of most tests of the new brand tubes compared to the Becton-Dickinson brand tube, and the bias calculated for the tests except calcium and potassium was detected to be lower than the desirable bias. Conclusion: It was determined that the test parameters analyzed in both tubes were in statistical agreement. The percentage of bias value of calcium and potassium tests in KWS branded tubes is higher than the desired value. In addition, constant and proportional errors were determined for the calcium test. These test parameters should be analyzed in larger patient groups. Therefore, KWS tubes can be accepted for routine laboratory operations.

Authors

علی ولکان اوزدمیر

Usak Training and Research Hospital, Department of Clinical Biochemistry Laboratory, Usak, Turkey

سویا نیزه

Usak University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Medical Biochemistry, Usak, Turkey

متن اهن

Usak Training and Research Hospital, Department of Clinical Biochemistry Laboratory, Usak, Turkey

مراجع و منابع این Paper:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این Paper را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود Paper لینک شده اند :
  • . Lippi G, Chance JJ, Church S, Dazzi P, Fontana ...
  • . Bowen R, Kim S, Sattayapiwat A, Esguerra V, Zare ...
  • . Landt M, Wilhite TR, Smith CH. A new plastic ...
  • . Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) document GP۴۴-A۴ Procedures ...
  • . Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) document EP۲۸-A۳c. Defining, ...
  • . Lippi G, Cornes MP, Grankvist K, Nybo M, Simundic ...
  • . Ricos C, Alvarez V, Cava F, Garcia-Lario JV, Hernandez ...
  • . Lippi G, Chance JJ, Church S, Dazzi P, Fontana ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع