Comparison of the anti-diabetic and nephroprotective activity of vitamin E metformin and Nigella sativa oil on kidney in experimental diabetic rats
Publish place: Iranian Journal of Basic Medical Sciences، Vol: 26، Issue: 4
Publish Year: 1402
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: English
View: 134
This Paper With 5 Page And PDF Format Ready To Download
- Certificate
- من نویسنده این مقاله هستم
استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:
شناسه ملی سند علمی:
JR_IJBMS-26-4_003
تاریخ نمایه سازی: 9 اسفند 1401
Abstract:
Objective(s): In this study, we aimed to evaluate and compare the nephroprotective and possible anti-diabetic effects of vitamin E, metformin, and Nigella sativa. Materials and Methods: Thirty male Wistar Albino rats were randomly divided into control, experimental diabetes (DM), vitamin E + DM, Metformin + DM, and N. sativa + DM. For experimental diabetes induction, IP ۴۵ mg/kg streptozotocin was administered. Rats in vitamin E + DM, Metformin + DM, and N. sativa + DM received ۱۰۰ mg/kg vitamin E, ۱۰۰ mg/kg metformin, and ۲.۵ ml/kg N. sativa oil for ۵۶ days. After the experiment, all animals were sacrificed, and blood and kidney samples were collected.Results: The blood urea level of the DM group was significantly higher (P<۰.۰۱) than the control group. Urea levels in vitamin E, metformin, and N. sativa groups were similar to the control group (P>۰.۰۵) but significantly different from the DM group (P<۰.۰۱). Bax, caspase-۳, and caspase-۹ immunopositivity intensity were quite low in the control group, and similar to the N. sativa group (P>۰.۰۵). Bcl-۲ immunopositivity density was highest in the N. sativa group, similar to the control group in terms of percentile area (P>۰.۰۵). Conclusion: When all three treatment methods were compared in terms of their effectiveness in alleviating DM and DN, it was determined that the most successful result was obtained with N. sativa oil.
Keywords:
Authors
Hayat Ayaz
Dicle University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Histology and Embryology, Diyarbakir, Turkey
Seval Kaya
Istanbul Aydin University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Histology and Embryology, Istanbul, Turkey
Uğur Şeker
Istanbul Aydin University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Histology and Embryology, Istanbul, Turkey
Yusuf Nergiz
Dicle University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Histology and Embryology, Diyarbakir, Turkey
مراجع و منابع این Paper:
لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این Paper را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود Paper لینک شده اند :