Effect of different adhesive systems and silane application on shear bond strength of resin cement to indirect restorations
Publish Year: 1402
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: English
View: 77
This Paper With 7 Page And PDF Format Ready To Download
- Certificate
- من نویسنده این مقاله هستم
استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:
شناسه ملی سند علمی:
JR_JDMT-12-2_008
تاریخ نمایه سازی: 19 تیر 1402
Abstract:
Objective: This study compared the influence of various adhesive systems and silane application on the adhesion of resin-based luting cement to lithium disilicate, indirect composite resin, and zirconia restorations.Methods: Lithium disilicate (n=۵۰), indirect composite resin (n=۵۰), and zirconia (n=۵۰) blocks were divided into five groups (n=۱۰), according to the adhesive protocol applied as follows: ۱. Optibond XTR, ۲. silane + Optibond All in One, ۳. One Coat ۷ Universal, ۴) Adper Scotchbond Multi-Purpose, and ۵) Silane + Single Bond Universal. The blocks were bonded to a resin-based luting cement after surface treatments (silica coating and acid application). The bonded specimens were incubated in ۳۷° C water for ۲۴ hours and thermocycled for ۵,۰۰۰ cycles. The shear bond strength (SBS) was evaluated by a universal testing machine. The adhesion protocols for each type of restoration were compared by one-way ANOVA and Dunnett T۳ test.Results: There were significant differences in the bond strength of cement to indirect restorations between various adhesive protocols (P<۰.۰۵). In all types of restorations, the highest SBS was observed in group ۵, which was silanized and bonded with Single Bond Universal. The bond strength of group ۵ in lithium disilicate, indirect composite resin, and zirconia groups were ۲۶.۱ ± ۴.۹ MPa, ۲۰.۵ ± ۵.۷ MPa, and ۱۵.۴ ± ۴.۷ MPa, respectively.Conclusions: It appears that the best adhesive protocol for bonding cement to lithium disilicate, indirect composite resin, and zirconia restorations is the use of silane and a universal adhesive containing silane (Single Bond Universal). (J Dent Mater Tech ۲۰۲۳;۱۲(۲): ۱۰۴-۱۱۰)
Keywords:
Authors
Makbule Heval Şahan
Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Ege University, Izmir, Turkey.
Cem Peşkersoy
Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Ege University, Izmir, Turkey.
Övül Kümbüloğlu
Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Ege University, Izmir, Turkey.
Murat Türkün
Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Ege University, Izmir, Turkey.
مراجع و منابع این Paper:
لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این Paper را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود Paper لینک شده اند :