A Critical Discourse Analysis of Vision Textbooks: Representation of Social Relations and Ideology

Publish Year: 1402
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: English
View: 311

This Paper With 25 Page And PDF Format Ready To Download

  • Certificate
  • من نویسنده این مقاله هستم

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این Paper:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_LGHOR-7-2_001

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 20 شهریور 1402

Abstract:

Considering the importance of the textbooks within the field of ELT, EFL textbooks should be subjected to for their suitability. Therefore, this article compared three dimensions of meaning (i.e., contents, subject positions, and social relations) in the conversations of the three volumes of the Vision textbook series developed by Iranian educational system. To this end, the theory and procedures of critical discourse analysis, as expounded by Fairclough (۱۹۸۹), were applied to the corpus of the study. The analysis into the dimension of contents revealed that the focus of material developers was more on the topics of everyday and school issues. The analysis into subject positions demonstrated that the material developers had focused more on the student character, with a tinge of gender inequality. The analysis into social relations disclosed their focus on the family and school life relationships for older students, tending to depict male supremacy. Besides, it was revealed that the ideology of Iran centrism had been underscored in the three textbooks thereby focusing on the issue of localization. Finally, two semi-structured interviews were conducted with two material developers of Vision series, which corroborated the CDA results. The findings of this study may have implications for language teachers and material developers.

Authors

سپیده عبدالحی

MA Graduate, Department of English, Qom Branch, Islamic Azad University, Qom, Iran. abdolhay@qom-iau.ac.ir

نرجس اشعری تبار

Assistant Professor, Department of English, Qom Branch, Islamic Azad University, Qom, Iran

امیرحسین سرکشیکیان

Assistant Professor, Department of English, Qom Branch, Islamic Azad University, Qom, Iran.

مراجع و منابع این Paper:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این Paper را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود Paper لینک شده اند :
  • Alavimogaddam, S. B., Kheirabadi, R., Rahimi, M., & Davari, R. ...
  • Alavimogaddam, S. B., Kheirabadi, R., Rahimi, M., & Davari, R. ...
  • Alavimogaddam, S. B., Kheirabadi, R., Rahimi, M., & Davari, R. ...
  • Amini, M., & Birjandi, P. (۲۰۰۳). Gender bias in the ...
  • Chalak, A., & Ghasemi, B. (۲۰۱۷). A critical discourse analysis ...
  • Cots, J. M. (۲۰۰۶). Teaching “with an attitude”: Critical discourse ...
  • Dörnyei, Z. (۲۰۰۷). Research methods in applied linguistics: Quantitative, qualitative, ...
  • Fairclough, N. (۱۹۸۹). Language and power. Routledge ...
  • Fairclough, N. (۱۹۹۵). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of ...
  • Fairclough, N. (۲۰۰۱). Language and Power (۲nd ed.). Pearson Education ...
  • Fairclough, N. (۲۰۱۵). Language and power (۳rd ed.). LongmanHamledari, M. ...
  • Islam, K. M. M., & Asadullah, M. N. (۲۰۱۸). Gender ...
  • Monchinski, T. (۲۰۰۸). Critical pedagogy and the everyday classroom. Springer ...
  • Mukundan, J., & Nimehchisalem, V. (۲۰۰۸). Gender representation in Malaysian ...
  • Siegel, A. (۲۰۱۴). What should we talk about? The authenticity ...
  • Van Dijk, T. A. (۲۰۰۰). Ideology and discourse: A multidisciplinary ...
  • Whitehead, D. (۲۰۱۵). Foreword. In C. Kennedy (Ed.), English language ...
  • Wodak, R., & Meyer, M. (۲۰۰۱). Methods of critical discourse ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع