Kirkpatrick Model as Evaluation Training Program for Assessor: Case Study of Government Employee

Publish Year: 1402
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: English
View: 63

This Paper With 22 Page And PDF Format Ready To Download

  • Certificate
  • من نویسنده این مقاله هستم

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این Paper:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_IJMAE-10-9_003

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 28 دی 1402

Abstract:

The study analyzed the evaluation of training programs provided to prospective assessors at the Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources. The object of study is a trainee who is projected as an assessor.  The total number of participants was ۲۳ people. Kirkpatrick's model served as the basis for evaluating the training program. The four evaluation levels analyzed include reactions, learning, behavior, and outcomes. The four stages of Kirkpatrick's model can provide a description of the training process and recommendation items to the organization. This recommendation is given for continuous improvement of training quality. Data analysis using a mix-method approach is due to the combination of primary and secondary data. The results of the study explained that the four levels in the Kirkpatrick model were adequacy in the implementation of the training program. The four models explain that all training components and processes are running well. Prospective assessors who are trained are given high expectations to remain in training at an advanced level. The evaluation level provides several recommendations including reformulation of training planning, learning related to accreditation standards, professional ethics-based behavior, and work results adjusted to excellent service accompanied by high quality. Recommendations on the results of training evaluations can be carried out to improve the quality of the program in accordance with the needs of the organization. Training should be conducted adaptively, with high flexibility, and new competencies for prospective assessors. The results of the training can make a significant contribution to the expectations of the organization.

Authors

Ahmad Azmy

Faculty of Economics and Business, Paramadina University, Jakarta, Indonesia

Nidya Setiarini

Faculty of Economics and Business, Paramadina University, Jakarta, Indonesia

مراجع و منابع این Paper:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این Paper را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود Paper لینک شده اند :
  • Alsalamah, A., & Callinan, C. (۲۰۲۱). Adaptation of Kirkpatrick’s four-level ...
  • Bozionelos, N., Lin, C. H., & Lee, K. Y. (۲۰۲۰). ...
  • Dessler, G. (۲۰۲۰). Human Resource Management Fifteenth edition. In Pearson ...
  • Dorri, S., Akbari, M., & Dorri Sedeh, M. (۲۰۱۶). Kirkpatrick ...
  • Garavan, T., McCarthy, A., Lai, Y., Murphy, K., Sheehan, M., ...
  • Kirkpatrick, D. L., & Kirkpatrick, J. D. (۲۰۱۷). Kirkpatrick’s Four ...
  • Kirkpatrick, J. D., & Kirpatrick, W. K. (۲۰۱۶). Kirkpatrick’s Four ...
  • Krötz, M., & Deutscher, V. (۲۰۲۱). Quality of in-company training—A matter ...
  • Lantu, D. C., Labdhagati, H., Razanaufal, M. W., & Sumarli, ...
  • Stamatelatos, A., & Brooks, R. (۲۰۲۰). Simulated business effectiveness: learning ...
  • Vijayabanu, C., & Amudha, R. (۲۰۱۲). A study on efficacy ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع