Advances Advances in Statistical Methods for Genetic Improvement of Livestock: A Review

Publish Year: 1402
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: English
View: 60

This Paper With 25 Page And PDF Format Ready To Download

  • Certificate
  • من نویسنده این مقاله هستم

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این Paper:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_GJSAR-11-1_007

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 23 بهمن 1402

Abstract:

Developments in statistics and computing as well as their application to genetic improvement of livestock gained momentum over the last ۳۰ years. This paper reviews and consolidates the statistical methodology used in animal breeding. This paper will prove useful as a reference source for animal breeders, quantitative geneticists, and statisticians working in these areas. The estimates of genetic and phenotypic parameters viz. heritability, genetic and phenotypic correlation are used to determine the method of selection, the intensity of selection for different traits of interest, and prediction of selection response. The unbiased property of ANOVA estimators demands no distributional assumptions of the random effects and the residual error terms in a model but all sampling variance results have been developed based on assuming normality. The parameters are estimated by maximizing the logarithm of the likelihood function. The estimates of predictors of the random effects are expected to be more efficient. The drawbacks of ML are first, that it is downwardly biased because the loss of degrees of freedom due to estimating fixed effects is not taken into account. The estimates of predictors of the random effects are expected to be more efficient. The drawbacks of ML are first, that it is downwardly biased because the loss of degrees of freedom due to estimating fixed effects is not taken into account. Maximum likelihood (ML) restricted maximum likelihood and minimum norm quadratic unbiased estimations (MINQUE) are all preferred to ANOVA because they have built-in properties. MINQUE may considerably be better than the analysis of variance procedures. DFREML was the first public package to implement the derivative-free REML, and it became the standard in the field to which every other program is compared. Its unique feature is the likelihood ratio test for testing the significance of variance component estimates. The use of ML and REML in animal breeding has brought about a change in the random effects fitted in the infinitesimal additive genetic model. In traditional ANOVA and related methods, (co) variance is described in terms of random effect due to single parent (e.g., sire model) or both parents (sire dam model), uniquely partitioning the total sum of the squared deviations of the observations from the grand mean into the sum of squares contributed by each factor in the design. However, over the last decade, considerable research effort has concentrated on the development of specialized and efficient algorithms. This has been closely linked to advances in the genetic evaluation of animals by Best Linear Unbiased Prediction (BLUP). However, ML and REML allow the random effect of models to be expressed in terms of the genetic merit or breeding value of animals. These models are called individual animal models (IAM) and incorporate information on the relationship between all animals. Animal Model (AM) has influenced the use of the mixed model methodology in the statistical analysis of animal breeding data considerably. The AM includes a random effect for the additive genetic merit of each animal, both for animals with records and animals which are parents only, incorporating all known relationship information in the analysis.Developments in statistics and computing as well as their application to genetic improvement of livestock gained momentum over the last ۳۰ years. This paper reviews and consolidates the statistical methodology used in animal breeding. This paper will prove useful as a reference source for animal breeders, quantitative geneticists, and statisticians working in these areas. The estimates of genetic and phenotypic parameters viz. heritability, genetic and phenotypic correlation are used to determine the method of selection, the intensity of selection for different traits of interest, and prediction of selection response. The unbiased property of ANOVA estimators demands no distributional assumptions of the random effects and the residual error terms in a model but all sampling variance results have been developed based on assuming normality. The parameters are estimated by maximizing the logarithm of the likelihood function. The estimates of predictors of the random effects are expected to be more efficient. The drawbacks of ML are first, that it is downwardly biased because the loss of degrees of freedom due to estimating fixed effects is not taken into account. The estimates of predictors of the random effects are expected to be more efficient. The drawbacks of ML are first, that it is downwardly biased because the loss of degrees of freedom due to estimating fixed effects is not taken into account. Maximum likelihood (ML) restricted maximum likelihood and minimum norm quadratic unbiased estimations (MINQUE) are all preferred to ANOVA because they have built-in properties. MINQUE may considerably be better than the analysis of variance procedures. DFREML was the first public package to implement the derivative-free REML, and it became the standard in the field to which every other program is compared. Its unique feature is the likelihood ratio test for testing the significance of variance component estimates. The use of ML and REML in animal breeding has brought about a change in the random effects fitted in the infinitesimal additive genetic model. In traditional ANOVA and related methods, (co) variance is described in terms of random effect due to single parent (e.g., sire model) or both parents (sire dam model), uniquely partitioning the total sum of the squared deviations of the observations from the grand mean into the sum of squares contributed by each factor in the design. However, over the last decade, considerable research effort has concentrated on the development of specialized and efficient algorithms. This has been closely linked to advances in the genetic evaluation of animals by Best Linear Unbiased Prediction (BLUP). However, ML and REML allow the random effect of models to be expressed in terms of the genetic merit or breeding value of animals. These models are called individual animal models (IAM) and incorporate information on the relationship between all animals. Animal Model (AM) has influenced the use of the mixed model methodology in the statistical analysis of animal breeding data considerably. The AM includes a random effect for the additive genetic merit of each animal, both for animals with records and animals which are parents only, incorporating all known relationship information in the analysis.

Keywords:

BLUP , DFREML , REML , Animal Model and MINQUE

Authors

C.V. Singh

G.B. Pant University of Agriculture & Technology, Pantnagar-۲۶۳۱۴۵, District Udham Singh Nagar (Uttarakhand), Department of Animal Genetics and Breeding College of Veterinary and Animal Science, India

مراجع و منابع این Paper:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این Paper را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود Paper لینک شده اند :
  • Banks, B.D.; Ma O. I. and Walter, J.P. 1985. Robustness ...
  • Barlow, R. 1978. Biological ramification of selection for preweaning growth ...
  • Canon and Cheshais, J. 1989. Indirect approach to simultaneous sire ...
  • Chauhan, V.P.S. 1991. Comparison of estimates of heritability of milk ...
  • Cue, R.I. 1986. Variance covariance components estimation for uni-variaties embeded ...
  • Dangi, Manita.2020. Evaluation of efficiency of sire model and animal ...
  • Dempster, A.P.; Lairal, N.M. and Rubin, D.B. 1977. Maximum likelihood ...
  • Dempster, A.P.; Seleyn, M.R.; Patel, C.M. and Roth, A.J. 1984. ...
  • Eisenhart, C. 1947. The assumptions underlying the analysis of variance. ...
  • Falconer, D.S. 1989. Introduction to quantitative genetics, 3rd edition. Longman, ...
  • Fisher, R.A. 1918. The correlation between relations on the supposition ...
  • Fisher, R.A. 1925. Statistical methods for research workers. 1st Edn. ...
  • Foulley, J.L. 1990. Genetic parameters estimation introduction, In Proc. 4th ...
  • Graser, H.U.; Smith, S.P. and Tier, B. 1987. A derivative ...
  • Handerson, C.R. 1984. Estimation of variance and co-variance under multi-trait ...
  • Harville, D.A. 1977. Maximum likelihood approaches to variance components estimation ...
  • Harville, D.A. and Callanan, T.B. 1988. Computational aspects of likelihood ...
  • Hays, J.F. and Hill, W.G. 1980. A reparametrization of a ...
  • Henderson, C.R. 1953. Estimation of variance and covariance components. Biometrics. ...
  • Henderson, C.R. 1973. Sire evaluation and genetic trends. In Proc. ...
  • Henderson, C.R. 1976. A simple method of for computing the ...
  • Henderson, C.R. 1985. MIVQUE and REML estimation of additive and ...
  • Henderson, C.R. 1988. Progress in statistical methods applied to quantitative ...
  • Henderson, C.R. 1990a. Statistical methods in animal improvement : historical ...
  • Henderson, C.R. and Quaas, R.L. 1976. Multiple trait evaluation using ...
  • Herbach, L.H. 1959. Properties of model it type analysis of ...
  • Hudson, G.F.S. and Schaeffer, L.R. 1984. Montecarlo comparison of sire ...
  • Interbull.2009. National GES information. http://www-interbull.slu.se/national _ges_info2/framesida-ges.htm Accessed January 22, 2009. ...
  • Jain, A. and Sadana, D.K. 2000. Heritability estimates under single ...
  • James, J.W. 1991. Effect of using an incorrect model in ...
  • Keele, J.W. and Harvey, W.R. 1989. Estimation of components of ...
  • Kennedy, B.W. 1981. Variance component estimation and prediction of breeding ...
  • Kennedy, B.W. 1988. Use of mixed model methodology in analysis ...
  • Kennedy, B.W. and Sorensen, D.A. 1988. Properties of mixed model ...
  • Kennedy, B.W., Schaeffer, L.R. and Sorensen, D.A. 1988. Genetic properties ...
  • Klassen, D.J. and Smith, S.P. 1990. Animal model estimation using ...
  • Lin, C.Y. 1987. Application of singular value decomposition to restricted ...
  • Lukač, D., Miščević, B., Könyves, T., Puvača, N., Džinić, N.& ...
  • Madsen P, Jensen J, Thompson R (1994) Estimation of (co)variance ...
  • Meyer, K. 1983. Maximum likelihood procedures for estimating genetic parameters ...
  • Meyer, K. 1985. Maximum likelihood estimation of variance components for ...
  • Meyer, K. 1988a. DFREML a set of programs to estimate ...
  • Meyer, K. 1988b. Estimation of variance components for Individual Animal ...
  • Meyer, K. 1988c. Approximate accuracy of genetic evaluation under an ...
  • Meyer, K. 1989a. Estimation of genetic parameters In : Hill, ...
  • Meyer, K. 1990. Present status of knowledge about statistical procedures ...
  • Meyer, K. 1991. Estimating variances and covariances for multivariate animal ...
  • Meyer, K. and Burnside, E.B. 1988. Joint sire and cow ...
  • Meyer, K. and Hill, W.G. 1992. Approximation of sampling variances ...
  • Meyer, K. and Thompson, R. 1984. Bias in variance and ...
  • Misztal, I, 1994a. Comparison of software packages in animal breeding. ...
  • Misztal, I. 1992. Derivative free vs Expectation maximization restricted maximum ...
  • Misztal, I. 1994b. Comparison of computing properties of derivative and ...
  • Mrode R.A.2005. Linear Models for the Prediction of Animal Breeding ...
  • Nelder, J.A. and Mead, R. 1965. A simple method for ...
  • Paterson, H.D. and Thompson, R. 1971. Recovery of inter block ...
  • Quaas, R.L. 1976. Computing the diagonal elements and universe of ...
  • Raheja, K.L. 1992. Selection free estimates of genetic parameters of ...
  • Raheja, K.L.; Vinayak, A.K. and Kalra, S. 2000. Genetic and ...
  • Raheja, K.L.; Vinayak, A.K. and Kalra, S. 2001. Comparison of ...
  • Rao, C.R. 1971. Minimum variance quadratic estimation of variance components. ...
  • Robertson, A. 1977. The effect of selection in the estimation ...
  • Robinson, J.A.B. 1988. Multiple lactation variance component estimation using restricted ...
  • Schaeffer, L. R.( 1983). Effectiveness of model for cow evaluation ...
  • Schaeffer, L.R. 1979. Estimation of variance and covariance components for ...
  • Schaeffer, L.R. 1986. Estimation of variances and covariances within the ...
  • Schaeffer, L.R. and Soong, H. 1979. Selection bias and REML ...
  • Schaeffer, L.R.; Wilton, J.W. and Thompson, R. 1978. Simultaneous estimation ...
  • Searle, S.R. 1989. Variance components. Some history and summary accounts ...
  • Searle, S.R.; Casella, G. and Mc Culloch, C.E. 1992. Variance ...
  • Shaw, R.G. 1987. Maximum likelihood approaches applied to quantitative genetics ...
  • Smith, S.P. and Graser, H.U. 1986. Estimating variance components in ...
  • Sorensen, D.A. and Kennedy, B.W. 1984. Estimation of genetic variances ...
  • Sorensen, D.A. and Kennedy, B.W. 1986. Analysis of selection experiments ...
  • Sun, C., Madsen, P., Lund, M. S., Zhang, Y., Nielsen, ...
  • Sun, C., Madsen, P., Nielsen, U. S., Zhang, Y., Lund, ...
  • Taylor, J.F.; Bean, B.; Marshall, C.E. and Sullivan, J.J. 1985. ...
  • Thompson, R. 1973. The estimation of variance and covariance components ...
  • Thompson, R. and Atkins, K.D. 1990. Estimation of heritability from ...
  • Thompson, R. and Juga, J. 1988. A derivative–free approach for ...
  • Thompson, R. and Juga, J. 1989. A derivative free approach ...
  • Thompson, R. and Meyer, K. 1986. Estimation of variance components: ...
  • Thompson, W.A. Jr. 1962. The problem of negative estimates of ...
  • Townsand, E.C. and Searle, S.R. 1971. Best quadratic unbiased estimation ...
  • Van Raden, P.M. and Freeman, A.E. 1986. Computing restricted maximum ...
  • Webb, A.J. And Bampton, P.R. 1990. Impact of the new ...
  • Westfall, P.H. 1987. A comparison of variance components estimates for ...
  • Wiggans, G.R. and Misztal, I. 1987. Super computer for animal ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع