Toward Socio-Pragmatic Analysis of Persian Historical Drama: Based Bayhaqi's History

Publish Year: 1401
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: English
View: 3

This Paper With 12 Page And PDF Format Ready To Download

  • Certificate
  • من نویسنده این مقاله هستم

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این Paper:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_LART-7-2_006

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 6 مرداد 1403

Abstract:

This paper shows how classic Persian drama can be studied into pragmatics, utterances use three kinds of felicity conditions including content, sincerity and prepatory conditions. The violation of the mentioned conditions creates infelicitous model. It means that interlocutors disobey felicious conditions to convey their intentions successfully. The data samples taken from Beyhaqi history which is a historical drama resulting in tragedy which begins with the death of Ghaznavid great sultan, and ends with the destruction of a powerful chief minister. Adopting pragmatic analysis, present study investigates the dialogues of Bayhaqi's History so that it intends to study how characters do their communicative purposes while they produce their utterances. The result of the research founded that because of caution, fear, and some cultural schema, the interlocutors use infelicitous strategies to make reader familiar with monarchy situation in which no one had right to freedom speech.This paper shows how classic Persian drama can be studied into pragmatics, utterances use three kinds of felicity conditions including content, sincerity and prepatory conditions. The violation of the mentioned conditions creates infelicitous model. It means that interlocutors disobey felicious conditions to convey their intentions successfully. The data samples taken from Beyhaqi history which is a historical drama resulting in tragedy which begins with the death of Ghaznavid great sultan, and ends with the destruction of a powerful chief minister. Adopting pragmatic analysis, present study investigates the dialogues of Bayhaqi's History so that it intends to study how characters do their communicative purposes while they produce their utterances. The result of the research founded that because of caution, fear, and some cultural schema, the interlocutors use infelicitous strategies to make reader familiar with monarchy situation in which no one had right to freedom speech.

Keywords:

Authors

Alireza Nabilu

Professor of the Department of Persian Language and Literature, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, University of Qom, Qom, Iran.

Mahdi Taheri Asl

PhD in Persian Language and Literature, Lecturer at Farhangian University, Qom, Iran.

مراجع و منابع این Paper:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این Paper را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود Paper لینک شده اند :
  • Allott, N. (2010). Key terms in pragmatics: Bloomsbury Publishing. ...
  • Al-Mulk, N. (2002). The Book of Government, Or, Rules for ...
  • Austin, JL. (1975). How to do things with words: Oxford ...
  • Beeman, WO. (1986). "Language, status, and power in Iran: Indiana ...
  • Beeman, WO. (2020). Ta’ārof–the key to Iranian social behavior. Persian ...
  • Beyhaqi, A. (2011). The History of Beyhaqi:(the History of Sultan ...
  • Bublitz, W., Norrick, NR. (2011). Foundations of pragmatics: Walter de ...
  • Burke, M. (2017). The Routledge handbook of stylistics: Routledge. ...
  • Cuddon, JA. (2012). A dictionary of literary terms and literary ...
  • Cummings, L. (2010). The Routledge pragmatics encyclopedia: Routledge. ...
  • Hamid, M.N.S. (2019). Reading History in Historical Literature: An Analysis ...
  • Haryanti, RD. (2016). A sociopragmatic analysis of interruptions by the ...
  • Iranica, E. (2019). Encyclopaedia iranica. Center for Iranian Studies-Columbia University. ...
  • Kazemimojaveri, E. (2016). A short introduction to Iranian drama. Mimesis ...
  • Katouzian, H. (2012). Iranian history and politics: The dialectic of ...
  • Leech, G. (2016). Principles of pragmatics: Routledge. ...
  • Lee, S. (2012). A pragmatic analysis of defamation and slanderous ...
  • Levy, R. (1951). A Mirror for Princes the Qabus Nama. ...
  • Lu, F.M. (2004). A Pragmatic Account of Pride and Prejudice. ...
  • Moradi, HG. (2017). Despotism in Iran: Dorrance Publishing. ...
  • Mulyanto, M., Fabiola, MPDPD, Kurnia, D. (2019). Pragmatic Analysis of ...
  • Mulyanto, Slamet Setiawan, and Fabiola D. Kurnia. (2019). "Pragmatic Analysis ...
  • Sharifian, F. (2005). The Persian cultural schema of shekasteh-nafsi: A ...
  • Tayebi, T. (2018). Implying an impolite belief: a case of ...
  • Young, LE. (2019). The psychology of state repression: Fear and ...
  • Yule, G. (1996). Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع