Relevance and Effectiveness of the WHO Global Code Practice on the International Recruitment of Health Personnel – Ethical and Systems Perspectives

Publish Year: 1394
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: English
View: 39

متن کامل این Paper منتشر نشده است و فقط به صورت چکیده یا چکیده مبسوط در پایگاه موجود می باشد.
توضیح: معمولا کلیه مقالاتی که کمتر از ۵ صفحه باشند در پایگاه سیویلیکا اصل Paper (فول تکست) محسوب نمی شوند و فقط کاربران عضو بدون کسر اعتبار می توانند فایل آنها را دریافت نمایند.

  • Certificate
  • من نویسنده این مقاله هستم

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این Paper:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_HPM-4-6_001

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 16 مرداد 1403

Abstract:

The relevance and effectiveness of the World Health Organization’s (WHO’s) Global Code of Practice on the International Recruitment of Health Personnel is being reviewed in ۲۰۱۵. The Code, which is a set of ethical norms and principles adopted by the World Health Assembly (WHA) in ۲۰۱۰, urges members states to train and retain the health personnel they need, thereby limiting demand for international migration, especially from the under-staffed health systems in low- and middle-income countries. Most countries failed to submit a first report in ۲۰۱۲ on implementation of the Code, including those source countries whose health systems are most under threat from the recruitment of their doctors and nurses, often to work in ۴ major destination countries: the United States, United Kingdom, Canada and Australia. Political commitment by source country Ministers of Health needs to have been achieved at the May ۲۰۱۵ WHA to ensure better reporting by these countries on Code implementation for it to be effective. This paper uses ethics and health systems perspectives to analyse some of the drivers of international recruitment. The balance of competing ethics principles, which are contained in the Code’s articles, reflects a tension that was evident during the drafting of the Code between ۲۰۰۷ and ۲۰۱۰. In ۲۰۰۷-۲۰۰۸, the right of health personnel to migrate was seen as a preeminent principle by US representatives on the Global Council which co-drafted the Code. Consensus on how to balance competing ethical principles – giving due recognition on the one hand to the obligations of health workers to the countries that trained them and the need for distributive justice given the global inequities of health workforce distribution in relation to need, and the right to migrate on the other hand – was only possible after President Obama took office in January ۲۰۰۹. It is in the interests of all countries to implement the Global Code and not just those that are losing their health personnel through international recruitment, given that it calls on all member states “to educate, retain and sustain a health workforce that is appropriate for their (need) …” (Article ۵.۴), to ensure health systems’ sustainability. However, in some wealthy destination countries, this means tackling national inequities and poorly designed health workforce strategies that result in foreign-trained doctors being recruited to work among disadvantaged populations and in primary care settings, allowing domestically trained doctors work in more attractive hospital settings.

Authors

Ruairi Brugha

Division of Population Health Sciences, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland

Sophie Crowe

Division of Population Health Sciences, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland

مراجع و منابع این Paper:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این Paper را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود Paper لینک شده اند :
  • World Health Organization (WHO). WHO Global Code of Practice on ...
  • WHO Global Code of Practice on the International Recruitment of ...
  • Taylor AL, Dhillon IS. The WHO Global Code of Practice ...
  • Siyam A, Zurn P, Rø OC, et al. Monitoring the ...
  • Edge JS, Hoffman SJ. Empirical impact evaluation of the WHO ...
  • Aluttis C, Bishaw T, Frank MW. The workforce for health ...
  • Tankwanchi AB, Ozden Ҫ, Vermund SH. Physician emigration from sub-Saharan ...
  • Wright D, Flis N, Gupta M. The ‘Brain Drain’ of ...
  • Zubaran C. Balancing the act: The international migration of medical ...
  • World Health Organization (WHO). The World Health Report – working ...
  • O’Brien P, Gostin L. Health Worker Shortages and Global Justice. ...
  • Crisp N, Chen L. Global supply of health professionals. N ...
  • Tankwanchi AB, Vermund SH, Perkins DD. Monitoring sub-Saharan African physician ...
  • Chen PG, Auerbach DI, Muench U, Curry LA, Bradley EH. ...
  • Mick SS, Worobey JL. The future role of foreign medical ...
  • Bourgeault IL, Neiterman E, LeBrun J, Viers K, Winkup J. ...
  • Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing. Medical Training Review ...
  • Supplement (forthcoming). Reviewing the relevance and effectiveness of the WHO ...
  • Bradby H. International medical migration: A critical conceptual review of ...
  • Mills EJ, Kanters S, Hagopian A, et al. The financial ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع