Repeatability, Reproducibility and Agreement of Central Corneal Thickness Measurements by Two Noncontact Pachymetry Devices

Publish Year: 1398
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: English
View: 13

This Paper With 6 Page And PDF Format Ready To Download

  • Certificate
  • من نویسنده این مقاله هستم

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این Paper:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_MEOP-8-1_007

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 16 مرداد 1403

Abstract:

Abstract This study was designed to assess the repeatability, reproducibility, and agreement of Noncontact Pachymetry (NPC) (Topcan TRK-۲P) and the non-contact optical low coherence reflectometer (Lenstar LS ۹۰۰) devices for measuring Central Corneal Thickness (CCT) of healthy corneas. A total of ۸۲ healthy volunteers were evaluated. The first observer used both the TopconTRK-۲P and Lenstar ۹۰۰ devices while the second observer only used the TopconTRK-۲P for the measurements. The measurements with either device were repeated three times for each patient, consecutively. The central corneal thickness measurements with the Topcon TRK-۲P revealed mean ± Standard Deviation (SD) values of ۵۵۳.۱ ± ۳۶.۱ micrometer (µm) for the first observer and ۵۵۲.۳ ± ۳۵.۹µm for the second observer and the mean ± SD of CCT was ۵۳۷.۳ ± ۳۴.۸µm with the Lenstar ۹۰۰. The difference between the CCT measurements of the observers using the Topcon TRK-۲P (P = ۰.۱۴۲) was insignificant. However, significantly lower measurements were found with the Lenstar ۹۰۰ compared with the Topcon TRK-۲P (P Ë‚ ۰.۰۰۱). The central corneal thickness measurements obtained by the Topcon TRK-۲P were found to have high repeatability for both observers with a lower SD, less than ۱% Coefficient of Variation (CV) and higher than ۰.۹۹ Intra-Class Correlation Coefficient (ICC) (Observer ۱: ۳.۷۷ SD, ۰.۶۸ CV and ۰.۹۹۵ ICC; the second observer: ۳.۵۸ SD, ۰.۶۵ CV and ۰.۹۹۵ ICC). There was an excellent inter-observer reproducibility between the two observers for Topcon TRK-۲P with ۲.۷۱ SD, ۰.۴۹ CV, and ۰.۹۹۴ ICC. The Bland-Altman plot showed high agreement between the two devices. These results suggest that the TopconTRK-۲P is a reliable device for evaluating CCT in healthy corneas compared with Lenstar ۹۰۰.