Addressing the UHC Challenge Using the Disease Control Priorities ۳ Approach: Lessons Learned and an Overview of the Pakistan Experience

Publish Year: 1403
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: English
View: 9

This Paper With 10 Page And PDF Format Ready To Download

  • Certificate
  • من نویسنده این مقاله هستم

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این Paper:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_HPM-13-0_003

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 17 مرداد 1403

Abstract:

Background  Pakistan developed its first national essential package of health services (EPHS) as a key step towards accelerating progress in achieving universal health coverage (UHC). We describe the rationale, aims, the systematic approach followed to EPHS development, methods adopted, outcomes of the process, challenges encountered, and lessons learned. Methods  EPHS design was led by the Ministry of National Health Services, Regulations & Coordination (MNHSR&C). The methods adopted were technically guided by the Disease Control Priorities ۳ (DCP۳) Country Translation project and existing country experience. It followed a participatory and evidence-informed prioritisation and decision-making processes. Results  The full EPHS covers ۱۱۷ interventions delivered at the community, health centre and first-level hospital platforms at a per capita cost of US ۲۹.۷. The EPHS also includes an additional set of ۱۲ population-based interventions at US ۰.۷۸ per capita. An immediate implementation package (IIP) of ۸۸ district-level interventions costing US ۱۲.۹۸ per capita will be implemented initially together with the population-based interventions until government health allocations increase to the level required to implement the full EPHS. Interventions delivered at the tertiary care platform were also prioritised and costed at US ۶.۵ per capita, but they were not included in the district-level package. The national EPHS guided the development of provincial packages using the same evidence-informed process. The government and development partners are in the process of initiating a phased approach to implement the IIP. Conclusion  Key ingredients for a successful EPHS design include a focus on package feasibility and affordability, national ownership and leadership, and solid engagement of national stakeholders and development partners. Major challenges to the transition to implementation are to continue strengthening the national technical capacity, institutionalise priority setting and package design and its revision in ministries of health, address health system gaps and bridge the current gap in financing with the progressive increase in coverage towards ۲۰۳۰.

Authors

Ala Alwan

DCP۳ Country Translation Project, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK

Sameen Siddiqi

Department of Community Health Sciences, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan

Malik Safi

Ministry of National Health Services, Regulations and Coordination, Islamabad, Pakistan

Raza Zaidi

Ministry of National Health Services, Regulations and Coordination, Islamabad, Pakistan

Muhammad Khalid

Ministry of National Health Services, Regulations and Coordination, Islamabad, Pakistan

Rob Baltussen

Department of Health Evidence, Radboud Institute of Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands

Ina Gudumac

DCP۳ Country Translation Project, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK

Maryam Huda

Department of Community Health Sciences, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan

Maarten Jansen

Department of Health Evidence, Radboud Institute of Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands

Wajeeha Raza

Centre for Health Economics, University of York, York, UK

Sergio Torres-Rueda

Department of Global Health & Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK

Wahaj Zulfiqar

Ministry of National Health Services, Regulations and Coordination, Islamabad, Pakistan

Anna Vassall

Department of Global Health & Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK

مراجع و منابع این Paper:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این Paper را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود Paper لینک شده اند :
  • World Health Organization, International Bank for Reconstruction and Development. Tracking ...
  • World Health Organization, International Bank for Reconstruction and Development. Tracking ...
  • SDG Indicators. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs ...
  • The UN High-Level Meeting (UN HLM) on Universal Health Coverage, ...
  • World Bank. World Development Report ۱۹۹۳: Investing in Health. New ...
  • Jamison DT, Breman JG, Measham AR, et al. Disease Control ...
  • Disease Control Priorities ۳ (DCP۳) website. https://dcp-۳.org/volumes. Accessed January ۹, ...
  • Watkins DA, Jamison DT, Mills A, et al. Universal health ...
  • Annex ۳C. Essential Universal Health Coverage: Interventions and Platforms. Disease ...
  • Population, Total – Pakistan (۲۰۲۰). World Bank website. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.POP.TOTL?locations=PK. Accessed ...
  • Zaidi SA, Bigdeli M, Langlois EV, et al. Health systems ...
  • Pakistan Bureau of Statistics (PBS). National Health Accounts ۲۰۱۷-۱۸. Islamabad: ...
  • Baltussen R, Jansen M, Akhtar S, et al. The use ...
  • Raza W, Zulfiqar W, Shah MM, et al. Costing interventions ...
  • Huda M, Kitson N, Saadi N, et al. Assessing global ...
  • Torres-Rueda S, Vassall A, Zaidi R, et al. The use ...
  • Alwan A, Yamey G, Soucat A. Essential packages of health ...
  • Alwan A, Majdzadeh R, Yamey G, et al. Country readiness ...
  • Baltussen R, Mwalim O, Blanchet K, et al. Decision-making processes ...
  • Gaudin S, Raza W, Skordis J, Soucat A, Stenberg K, ...
  • Soucat A, Tandon A, Gonzales Pier E. From universal health ...
  • Reynolds T, Wilkinson T, Bertram MY, et al. Building implementable ...
  • Siddiqi S, Aftab W, Venkat Raman A, Soucat A, Alwan ...
  • Danforth K, Ahmad AM, Blanchet K, et al. Monitoring and ...
  • Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation. Global Burden of Disease ...
  • Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health. ...
  • Vassall A, Sweeney S, Kahn JG, et al. Reference Case ...
  • Ministry of National Health Services, Regulations and Coordination, Disease Control ...
  • Health Interventions Prioritization Tool. http://hiptool.org/. Accessed January ۹, ۲۰۲۲ ...
  • Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME). Pakistan profile. Seattle, ...
  • Ministry of National Health Services, Regulations and Coordination. Towards Universal ...
  • Ministry of Health. The Essential Package of Hospital Services for ...
  • Wright J. Essential Package of Health Services Country Snapshot: Kenya. ...
  • Ministry of Health & Social Welfare. Essential Package of Health ...
  • Lange IL, Feroz F, Naeem AJ, et al. The development ...
  • Ministry of Health and Human Services. Essential Package of Health ...
  • Ministry of Health Ethiopia. Essential Health Services Package of Ethiopia ...
  • Ministry of Health of Liberia, Disease Control Priorities ۳ (DCP۳), ...
  • Ministry of National Health Services, Regulations & Coordination, Disease Control ...
  • Jamison DT, Summers LH, Alleyne G, et al. Global health ...
  • Eregata GT, Hailu A, Stenberg K, Johansson KA, Norheim OF, ...
  • Hailu A, Eregata GT, Yigezu A, Bertram MY, Johansson KA, ...
  • Zaidi S, Riaz A, Thaver A, Mukhi A, Khan LA. ...
  • Rajan D, Mathurapote N, Putthasri W, et al. Institutionalising participatory ...
  • Ben Mesmia H, Chtioui R, Ben Rejeb M. The Tunisian ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع