The Use of Evidence-Informed Deliberative Processes for Designing the Essential Package of Health Services in Pakistan

Publish Year: 1403
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: English
View: 39

This Paper With 8 Page And PDF Format Ready To Download

  • Certificate
  • من نویسنده این مقاله هستم

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این Paper:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_HPM-13-0_002

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 17 مرداد 1403

Abstract:

Background  The Disease Control Priorities ۳ (DCP۳) project provides long-term support to Pakistan in the development and implementation of its universal health coverage essential package of health services (UHC-EPHS). This paper reports on the priority setting process used in the design of the EPHS during the period ۲۰۱۹-۲۰۲۰, employing the framework of evidence-informed deliberative processes (EDPs), a tool for priority setting with the explicit aim of optimising the legitimacy of decision-making in the development of health benefit packages.Methods  We planned the six steps of the framework during two workshops in the Netherlands with participants from all DCP۳ Pakistan partners (October ۲۰۱۹ and February ۲۰۲۰), who implemented these at the country level in Pakistan in ۲۰۱۹ and ۲۰۲۰. Following implementation, we conducted a semi-structured online survey to collect the views of participants in the UHC benefit package design about the prioritisation process.Results  The key steps in the EDP framework were the installation of advisory committees (involving more than ۱۵۰ members in several Technical Working Groups [TWGs] and a National Advisory Committee [NAC]), definition of decision criteria (effectiveness, cost-effectiveness, avoidable burden of disease, equity, financial risk protection, budget impact, socio-economic impact and feasibility), selection of interventions for evaluation (a total of ۱۷۰), and assessment and appraisal (across the three dimensions of the UHC cube) of these interventions. Survey respondents were generallypositive across several aspects of the priority setting process.Conclusion  Despite several challenges, including a partial disruption because of the COVID-۱۹ pandemic, implementation of the priority setting process may have improved the legitimacy of decision-making by involving stakeholders through participation with deliberation, and being evidence-informed and transparent. Important lessons were learned that can be beneficial for other countries designing their own health benefit package such as on the options and limitations of broad stakeholder involvement.

Authors

Rob Baltussen

Department of Health Evidence, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands

Maarten Jansen

Department of Health Evidence, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands

Syeda Akhtar

Department of Health Services Policy and Management, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA

Leon Bijlmakers

Department of Health Evidence, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands

Sergio Torres-Rueda

Department of Global Health & Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK

Muhammad Khalid

Ministry of National Health Services, Regulations and Coordination, Islamabad, Pakistan

Wajeeha Raza

Centre for Health Economics, University of York, York, UK

Maryam Huda

Department of Community Health Sciences, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan

Gavin Surgey

Department of Health Evidence, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands

Wahaj Zulfiqar

Ministry of National Health Services, Regulations and Coordination, Islamabad, Pakistan

Anna Vassall

Department of Global Health & Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK

Raza Zaidi

Ministry of National Health Services, Regulations and Coordination, Islamabad, Pakistan

Sameen Siddiqi

Department of Community Health Sciences, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan

Ala Alwan

DCP۳ Country Translation Project, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK

مراجع و منابع این Paper:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این Paper را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود Paper لینک شده اند :
  • United Nations. Sustainable Development Goals. Goal ۳: Ensure Healthy Lives ...
  • Government of Pakistan. National Initative for Sustainable Development Goals. https://www.sdgpakistan.pk/ ...
  • Planning Commission Ministry of Planning, Development & Reform. Pakistan ۲۰۲۵: ...
  • Disease Control Priorities Project, Third Edition. University of Washington. http://dcp-۳.org/ ...
  • Jamison DT, Alwan A, Mock CN, et al. Universal health ...
  • Daniels N. Accountability for reasonableness. BMJ. ۲۰۰۰;۳۲۱(۷۲۷۲):۱۳۰۰-۱۳۰۱. doi:۱۱۳۶/bmj.۳۲۱.۷۲۷۲.۱۳۰ ...
  • World Health Organization (WHO). WHO Consultative Group on Equity and ...
  • Abelson J, Forest PG, Eyles J, Smith P, Martin E, ...
  • Safaei J. Deliberative democracy in health care: current challenges and ...
  • Bond K, Stiffell R, Ollendorf DA. Principles for deliberative processes ...
  • Oortwijn W, Husereau D, Abelson J, et al. Designing and ...
  • Baltussen R, Jansen MPM, Bijlmakers L, et al. Value assessment ...
  • Baltussen R, Jansen MP, Bijlmakers L, Tromp N, Yamin AE, ...
  • Oortwijn W, Jansen M, Baltussen R. Evidence-Informed Deliberative Process: A ...
  • Oortwijn W, Jansen M, Baltussen R. Evidence-informed deliberative processes for ...
  • Terwindt F, Rajan D, Soucat A. Priority-setting for national health ...
  • Glassman A, Giedion U, Smith PC. What's In, What's Out: ...
  • International Decision Support Initiative (iDSI). The HTA Toolkit. ۲۰۱۸. http://www.idsihealth.org/HTATOOLKIT/ ...
  • Castro H, Suharlim C, Kumar R. Moving LMICs Toward Self-Reliance: ...
  • Raza W, Zulfiqar W, Shah MM, et al. Costing interventions ...
  • Torres-Rueda S, Vassall A, Zaidi R, et al. The use ...
  • Huda M, Kitson N, Saadi N, et al. Assessing global ...
  • Alwan A, Siddiqi S, Safi M, et al. Addressing the ...
  • Ministry of National Health Services, Regulations and Coordination. Review of ...
  • Baltussen R, Mwalim O, Blanchet K, et al. Decision-making processes ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع