How to Realize the Benefits of Point-of-Care Testing at the General Practice: A Comparison of Four High-Income Countries

Publish Year: 1401
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: English
View: 41

This Paper With 13 Page And PDF Format Ready To Download

  • Certificate
  • من نویسنده این مقاله هستم

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این Paper:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_HPM-11-10_027

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 17 مرداد 1403

Abstract:

Background  In some countries, such as the Netherlands and Norway, point-of-care testing (POCT) is more widely implemented in general practice compared to countries such as England and Australia. To comprehend what is necessary to realize the benefits of POCT, regarding its integration in primary care, it would be beneficial to have an overview of the structure of healthcare operations and the transactions between stakeholders (also referred to as value networks). The aim of this paper is to identify the current value networks in place applying to POCT implementation at general practices in England, Australia, Norway and the Netherlands and to compare these networks in terms of seven previously published factors that support the successful implementation, sustainability and scale-up of innovations.Methods  The value networks were described based on formal guidelines and standards published by the respective governments, organizational bodies and affiliates. The value network of each country was validated by at least two relevant stakeholders from the respective country.Results  The analysis revealed that the biggest challenge for countries with low POCT uptake was the lack of effective communication between the several organizations involved with POCT as well as the high workload for general practitioners (GPs) aiming to implement POCT. It is observed that countries with a single national authority responsible for POCT have a better uptake as they can govern the task of POCT roll-out and management and reduce the workload for GPs by assisting with set-up, quality control, training and support.Conclusion  Setting up a single national authority may be an effective step towards realizing the full benefits of POCT. Although it is possible for day-to-day operations to fall under the responsibility of the GP, this is only feasible if support and guidance are readily available to ensure that the workload associated with POCT is limited and as low as possible.

Authors

Deon Lingervelder

Health Technology and Services Research Department, Technical Medical Centre, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands

Hendrik Koffijberg

Department of General Practice and Centre for Cancer Research, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia

Jon D. Emery

Department of General Practice and Centre for Cancer Research, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia

Paul Fennessy

Department of Health & Human Services, State Government of Victoria, Melbourne, VIC, Australia

Christopher P. Price

Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK

Harm van Marwijk

Department of Primary Care and Public Health, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, University of Sussex, Falmer, UK

Torunn B. Eide

Department of General Practice, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway

Sverre Sandberg

The Norwegian Organisation for Quality Improvement of Laboratory Examinations (NOKLUS), Haraldsplass Deaconess Hospital, Bergen, Norway

Jochen Cals

Department of Family Medicine, CAPHRI School for Public Health and Primary Care, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands

Joke Derksen

Sector Zorg, Zorginstituut Nederland, Diemen, The Netherlands

Ron Kusters

Health Technology and Services Research Department, Technical Medical Centre, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands

Maarten J. IJzermanx

Health Technology and Services Research Department, Technical Medical Centre, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands